Risk Factors for Athletic Pubalgia in Collegiate Football Student-Athletes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Athletic pubalgia (AP) is an increasingly recognized injury among young athletes. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics associated with AP in college football players. HYPOTHESIS: Repetitive explosive movements that require aggressive core muscle activation results in AP in collegiate football players. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Football student-athletes at a single Division I collegiate institution from January 2010 to December 2019 were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was surgery for AP. The odds of AP were determined using logistic regression, with the dependent variable being whether or not the student-athlete received AP surgery. Independent variables included Olympic weightlifting (OWL) exposure, primary playing position (skill position vs nonskill position), and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: A total of 1154 total student-athlete exposures met the inclusion criteria. Of the 576 student-athletes exposed to OWL (OWL occurred throughout entire calendar year), 20 developed AP, whereas 7 student-athletes not exposed to OWL (OWL was not performed at any point during calendar year) developed AP. Student-athletes exposed to OWL had a 2.86 (95% CI, 1.25-7.35; P = 0.02) times higher odds of AP than players not exposed after controlling for primary playing position and BMI. Skill position players had a 9.32 (95% CI, 1.71-63.96; P = 0.01) times higher odds of AP than nonskill position players when controlling for BMI and OWL training. CONCLUSION: Modifiable factors that increase exposure to repetitive explosive activities, such as OWL and playing a skill position, may be important considerations in developing AP. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cause of AP is multifactorial and poorly understood. Identifying factors associated with AP informs athletes, athletic trainers, physicians, and coaches.

Creating and Implementing a Protocol for the Management of Patients in Skeletal Traction: A Quality Improvement Project.

INTRODUCTION: Skeletal traction use generally has decreased over generations and is used most often for temporary fracture stabilization. Proper nursing management of patients in skeletal traction is crucial. A hospital protocol was created and implemented to educate and direct registered nurses (RNs) in the care of patients requiring skeletal traction. METHODS: A skeletal traction management protocol was drafted and implemented as hospital policy. Twenty-nine RNs from an orthopaedic unit at a level 1 trauma center attended a financially compensated, 45-minute, in-person, off-shift educational session. An anonymous pre-test utilizing a 5-point Likert scale was completed to assess RN knowledge and comfort regarding the following topics of traction care: pin care, manual traction, frame assembly, weight application and removal, skin evaluation, neurovascular checks, and reporting issues. The RNs were provided with a copy of the new hospital policy and key points were highlighted and demonstrated. After the demonstration, the RNs were given a post-test to assess their perceived knowledge and comfort with traction care. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in RN knowledge and comfort were seen in six of the seven evaluated topics. The greatest increase was seen in the manual traction topic. No significant change regarding neurovascular checks was observed with this topic having the highest pre-test scores. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital protocol was created successfully and implemented that significantly improved the level of RN knowledge and comfort with the management of patients requiring skeletal traction. Future studies should assess the effectiveness of annual education regarding the traction policy.

Evaluation of Protective Equipment Used Among Motorbike Riders.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared outcomes between patients injured at a motorbike track, which requires riders to follow safety equipment guidelines, and those involved in recreational riding where safety equipment usage is voluntary. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all patients presenting with motorbike-related injuries at an American College of Surgeons verified level-I trauma center between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. Data collected included demographics, injury details, safety equipment use, hospitalization details, and discharge disposition. Comparisons were made regarding protective equipment usage. RESULTS: Among the 115 patients admitted, more than half (54.8%, n = 63) were injured on a motorbike track, and 45.2% (n = 52) were injured in a recreational setting. The majority of patients were male (93.9%), Caucasian (97.4%), and between the ages of 18 to 54 (64.4%). Helmet usage was higher among track riders (95.2%, n = 60) than recreational riders (46.2%, n = 24, p < 0.0001). Comparisons of injury severity and outcomes between those who wore protective equipment and those who did not were not significant. CONCLUSION: Even though track riders wore protective equipment more than recreational riders, there was no difference between the groups regarding injury severity or hospital outcomes. These results suggested that motocross riders should not rely on protective equipment as the only measure of injury prevention.