The Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS): a randomized controlled trial comparing intensive and standard treatment on 5 years visual field development.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of an intensive initial IOP lowering treatment strategy on the progression of visual field damage. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-labelled two-center clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 242 patients with newly detected early or moderate untreated open-angle glaucoma were enrolled at two university hospitals in Sweden. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either initial treatment with intensive IOP-lowering medications followed by 360° laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), or to traditional mono-therapy, which was increased when deemed necessary. The primary study outcome of interest was the predicted remaining visual field, as measured by the visual field index (VFI) at projected end of life. RESULTS: The median untreated IOP was 24 mmHg in both treatment groups. During follow-up, median and mode IOP was 17 mmHg in the mono- and 14 mmHg in the multi-treated group. In the mono-treated group the median VFI at projected end of life was 79.3%, and in the multi-treated group 87.1%, p=0.15. Annual rate of progression of visual field damage was faster in mono-treated than in multi-treated participants; median losses per year were 0.65 and 0.25 percentage units respectively, p=0.09. Progression events occurred in 21% of the mono- and in 11% of the multi-treated participants, p=0.03. Adverse events, mostly mild, were reported in 25% of the mono-, and in 36% of the multi-treated participants. Differences in visual field outcomes between treatment groups were more pronounced in participants having higher baseline IOP defined by median split of untreated IOP values. CONCLUSION: In the overall analysis the visual field outcomes were not overwhelming better in the multi-treated group, but post-hoc analysis showed definite benefit in patients with higher untreated IOP. Based upon the results of this study, initial intensive treatment may be considered in glaucoma patients with high untreated IOP at diagnosis, while we found no evidence that multi-therapy should be given routinely to all glaucoma patients.

Long-term follow-up of laser trabeculoplasty in multi-treated glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term effect of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) in patients randomized to multi-treatment in the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS). METHODS: Patients with untreated newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma were treated with three intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering substances for 1 week and then 360° argon or selective LTP was performed. IOP was measured just before LTP and repeatedly during the 60-month study period. Our previous report on 12 months follow-up data revealed no effect of LTP in eyes having an IOP <15 mmHg before the laser treatment. RESULTS: Before LTP, the mean IOP ± standard deviation in all 152 study-eyes of 122 multi-treated patients was 14.0 ± 3.5 mmHg. Three eyes of three deceased patients were lost to follow-up during the 60 months. After exclusion of eyes that received increased therapy during follow-up, the IOP was significantly reduced at all visits up to 48 months in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥15 mmHg; 2.6 ± 3.1 mmHg at 1 month and 1.7 ± 2.8 mmHg at 48 months, n = 56 and 48, respectively. No significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP <15 mmHg. Seven eyes, i.e., <13%, with pre-LTP IOP ≥15 mmHg at baseline had required increased IOP-lowering therapy at 48 months. CONCLUSION: LTP performed in multi-treated patients may provide a useful IOP reduction that is maintained over several years. This was true on a group level when the initial IOP was ≥15 mmHg, but if the pre-laser IOP was lower than that, chances of LTP success were small.

Comparison of perimetric 24-2 and 30-2 test patterns in detecting visual field defects in patients with tumours in the pituitary region.

PURPOSE: Automated perimetry provides a standardized method of measuring the visual field. The Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) uses the 24-2 test pattern to cover 24 degrees centrally or the 30-2 test pattern to cover a slightly broader region of 30 degrees. The aim of this study was to determine whether the 24-2 test pattern provides comparable information to the 30-2 test pattern in detecting visual field defects in patients with tumours in the pituitary region. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on patients with tumours in the pituitary region and radiologically confirmed compression of the visual pathway. Included patients (79 of 133) had been examined using the Humphrey 30-2 visual field test, after which the 30-2 test patterns were reduced into corresponding 24-2 test patterns. The location of visual field defects, visual acuity and the perimetric parameters mean deviation (MD) and visual field index (VFI) were also recorded. RESULTS: No patient was classified differently when evaluated with the 24-2 test pattern, compared to the 30-2 test pattern. Interestingly, although the majority of patients had visual field defects located in the temporal visual field of each eye, a significant minority did not. In addition, it was found that a large proportion of patients had normal visual acuity (≥0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the HFA 24-2 test pattern reliably detected visual field defects in patients with tumours in the pituitary region. The present study indicates that MD and VFI are not reliable parameters for evaluating visual field defects due to compression.

Long-term Impact of Immediate Versus Delayed Treatment of Early Glaucoma: Results From the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term visual outcomes in the 2 arms of the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) and determine if delayed treatment was associated with a penalty in terms of visual function. DESIGN: Long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: EMGT was carried out at 2 centers in Sweden; 255 subjects with newly detected, untreated glaucoma were randomized to immediate treatment with topical betaxolol and argon laser trabeculoplasty or to no initial treatment as long as no progression was detected. Subjects were followed prospectively with standard automated perimetry, visual acuity measurements, and tonometry for up to 21 years. Outcomes included vision impairment (VI), the perimetric mean deviation (MD) index and rate of progression, and visual acuity. RESULTS: At study end, percentages of eyes with VI or blindness were slightly higher in the treated group than in the untreated control group, 12.1% vs 11.0%, and 9.4.% vs 6.1% respectively, as were subjects with VI in at least one eye, 19.5% vs 18.7%. The differences were not statistically significant, nor were cumulative incidences of VI in at least one eye. The control group had more field loss than the treatment group, with median MD in the worse eye of -14.73 dB vs -12.85 dB, and rate of progression of -0.74 vs -0.60 dB/y, which was not statistically significant. Differences in visual acuity were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Delaying treatment did not result in serious penalties. VI occurred at similar proportions in both treatment arms with a slight preponderance in the treatment group, whereas visual field damage was slightly higher in the control group.

Threat to fixation and vision-related quality of life in early open-angle glaucoma - results from the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of glaucomatous visual field (VF) damage close to the point of fixation, called threat-to-fixation (TTF), on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: A total of 239 patients from the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) were included in this analysis. The second VF of patients with newly diagnosed primarily early glaucoma was evaluated for the presence or absence of TTF. TTF was defined as VF loss including one or more of the four innermost test points depressed at p < 1% in the total deviation probability map of Humphrey 24-2 SITA Standard visual fields. VRQoL was evaluated using Rasch-analysed National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI VFQ-25) scores. The correlation between VRQoL and TTF was evaluated using uni- and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: TTF was present in at least one eye in 115 patients (48%); located in the superior hemifield alone in 47% (54 of 115), in the inferior hemifield alone in 23% (27 of 115), and in 30% (34 of 115) in both hemifields. The median Rasch-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 scores were identical when comparing patients with TTF (VRQoL score 66, 95% CI: 23-100) and those with no-TTF (VRQoL score 66, 95% CI: 21-100) (p = 0.925). Neither the presence of TTF (R2  = -0.004, p = 0.968) nor the location of TTF (R2  = 0.023, p = 0.103) was significantly correlated to Rasch-calibrated NEI VFQ-25 scores. CONCLUSION: The presence of TTF did not influence VRQoL, as measured by the NEI-VFQ-25, in this relatively large group of patients with mainly early glaucoma.

Estimating the Length of the Preclinical Detectable Phase for Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Importance: A 50% reduction of glaucoma-related blindness has previously been demonstrated in a population that was screened for open-angle glaucoma. Ongoing screening trials of high-risk populations and forthcoming low-cost screening methods suggest that such screening may become more common in the future. One would then need to estimate a key component of the natural history of chronic disease, the mean preclinical detectable phase (PCDP). Knowledge of the PCDP is essential for the planning and early evaluation of screening programs and has been estimated for several types of cancer that are screened for. Objective: To estimate the mean PCDP for open-angle glaucoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: A large population-based screening for open-angle glaucoma was conducted from October 1992 to January 1997 in Malmö, Sweden, including 32 918 participants aged 57 to 77 years. A retrospective medical record review was conducted to assess the prevalence of newly detected cases at the screening, incidence of new cases after the screening, and the expected clinical incidence, ie, the number of new glaucoma cases expected to be detected without a screening. The latter was derived from incident cases in the screened age cohorts before the screening started and from older cohorts not invited to the screening. A total of 2029 patients were included in the current study. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The length of the mean PCDP was calculated by 2 different methods: first, by dividing the prevalence of screen-detected glaucoma with the clinical incidence, assuming that the screening sensitivity was 100% and second, by using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model simulation that simultaneously derived both the length of the mean PCDP and the sensitivity of the screening. Results: Of 2029 included patients, 1352 (66.6%) were female. Of 1420 screened patients, the mean age at screening was 67.4 years (95% CI, 67.2-67.7). The mean length of the PCDP of the whole study population was 10.7 years (95% CI, 8.7-13.0) by the prevalence/incidence method and 10.1 years (95% credible interval, 8.9-11.2) by the MCMC method. Conclusions and Relevance: The mean PCDP was similar for both methods of analysis, approximately 10 years. A mean PCDP of 10 years found in the current study allows for screening with reasonably long intervals, eg, 5 years.

The glaucoma intensive treatment study: interim results from an ongoing longitudinal randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the perimetric rate of glaucoma progression in the ongoing Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) after 3 years of follow-up. DESIGN: This is a randomized, two-centre, prospective open-labelled treatment trial for open-angle glaucoma (OAG). PARTICIPANTS: The participants of this study were treatment-naive patients with newly diagnosed OAG, aged 46-78 years, with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss scheduled to be followed for 5 years within the study. METHODS: Patients were randomized to initial treatment with either topical monotherapy or with an intensive approach using drugs from three different classes, plus 360° laser trabeculoplasty. Changes in treatment were allowed. Standard automated perimetry and tonometry were performed and side-effects documented. All results are presented using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were randomized. After 3 years of follow-up, eight patients were lost to follow-up, six of whom were deceased. The median untreated baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24 mmHg in both arms. The median IOP was almost constant over the 3 years of follow-up: ≈17 mmHg in the mono-arm and ≈14 mmHg in the multi-treatment arm. Treatment was intensified in 42% of the mono-treated patients and in 7% of the multi-treated patients. Treatment was reduced in 13% of the multi-treated patients. The median perimetric rate of progression was -0.5%/year in the mono-treated group and -0.1%/year in the multi-treated group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The rate of disease progression was significantly slower in the multi-treated patients than in the mono-treated patients. Further follow-up will show whether this difference is sustained over time.

False Positive Responses in Standard Automated Perimetry.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between rates of false positive (FP) responses and standard automated perimetry results. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with manifest or suspect glaucoma were tested with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster at each of 2 visits. We calculated intervisit differences in mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and number of statistically significant test points as a function of FP rates and also as a function of general height (GH). RESULTS: Increasing FP values were associated with higher MD values for all 3 algorithms, but the effects were small, 0.3 dB to 0.6 dB, for an increase of 10 percentage points of FP rate, and for VFI even smaller (0.6%-1.4%). Only small parts of intervisit differences were explained by FP (r2 values 0.00-0.11). The effects of FP were larger in severe glaucoma, with MD increases of 1.1 dB to 2.0 dB per 10 percentage points of FP, and r2 values ranging from 0.04 to 0.33. The numbers of significantly depressed total deviation points were affected only slightly, and pattern deviation probability maps were generally unaffected. GH was much more strongly related to perimetric outcomes than FP. CONCLUSIONS: Across 3 different standard automated perimetry thresholding algorithms, FP rates showed only weak associations with visual field test results, except in severe glaucoma. Current recommendations regarding acceptable FP ranges may require revision. GH or other analyses may be better suited than FP rates for identifying unreliable results in patients who frequently press the response button without having perceived stimuli.

Ageing and glaucoma progression of the retinal nerve fibre layer using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of ageing and glaucoma progression on the thickness of the circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (cpRNFL) and to evaluate the performance of a set of optical coherence tomography (OCT) progression analyses. METHODS: The cpRNFL was measured twice by OCT at each of two visits made 10 years apart in 69 healthy individuals and 49 glaucoma patients. Both visits also included Humphrey 24-2 SITA standard testing. The change in cpRNFL thickness was analysed by linear regression, and a sub-analysis was performed on glaucoma patients with a perimetric mean deviation better than -10 dB at the first visit. The proportion of individuals whose OCT progression analyses indicated progression was also evaluated for the same groups. RESULTS: The average cpRNFL thickness deteriorated by a mean of -0.16 µm/year in the healthy cohort, increased by 0.03 µm/year in the glaucoma cohort, and deteriorated by -0.24 µm/year in eyes with less severe glaucoma; there were no statistically significant differences between the groups. For 17 (30%) of 56 healthy individuals, at least one of the three different OCT progression analyses incorrectly indicated progression. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in change of cpRNFL thickness between visits were found when comparing healthy subjects with glaucoma patients. Also, further cpRNFL thinning was not observed in glaucomatous eyes in which at least one-third of the visual field had been lost. The OCT progression analyses generated a relatively high proportion of false positives. Using OCT for glaucoma follow-up may not be entirely straightforward.

Screening for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Effect on Blindness.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of population screening on low vision and blindness from open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A large population-based screening for glaucoma was conducted in Malmö, Sweden, from 1992 to 1997. A total of 42,497 subjects were invited, of which 32,918 were screened, and 9,579 were non-responders (ie, did not participate). The records of glaucoma patients who had visited the Department of Ophthalmology at Malmö University Hospital from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed. Patients diagnosed at or after the screening were assessed for moderate or severe vision impairment, here called low vision, or blindness by the World Health Organization definition. Selection bias was corrected by creating a group of potential screening participants from a comparison group of clinical patients. Main outcome measures were the risk ratios of the cumulative incidence for bilateral low vision or blindness caused by glaucoma in screened patients compared with the potential participants. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of blindness was 0.17% in the screened population versus 0.32% among the potential participants; and for low vision 0.25% versus 0.53%. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) between the two was 0.52 (0.32-0.84) for blindness and 0.46 (0.31-0.68) for low vision. There were no differences between the proportions of potential confounders in the comparison group and those in the non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that population screening may reduce bilateral low vision and blindness caused by glaucoma by approximately 50%.

Laser trabeculoplasty in newly diagnosed multi-treated glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) in eyes which IOP had been substantially reduced by intensive topical treatment for one week. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma were randomized to treatment with three IOP-lowering substances. One week later, 360° argon or selective LTP was performed. IOP was measured before LTP and at one-, three-, six- and 12-month post-LTP. The patients were part of the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS). RESULTS: Mean IOP (± SD) in 152 eyes of 122 patients was 14.0 (± 3.5) mmHg just before LTP. For every mmHg higher IOP prior to LTP, the IOP was reduced by an additional 0.6 mmHg at 12 months. The IOP was significantly reduced at all follow-up visits from -2.6 (± 3.1) mmHg at one month to -2.1 (± 3.8) mmHg at 12 months in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥ 15 mmHg, while no significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP < 15 mmHg. Older age, argon LTP and male sex were associated with larger IOP reduction after 12 months, whereas presence of exfoliation syndrome was associated with a smaller IOP reduction. No severe complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Success of LTP was highly dependent on the IOP level prior to LTP treatment. A sustained significant IOP reduction was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP ≥ 15 mmHg whereas no such effect was seen in eyes with pre-LTP IOP < 15 mmHg. Thus, LTP can be considered in eyes with multi-treatment when target pressure of < 15 mmHg is not achieved.

Lifetime Risk of Visual Impairment Resulting from Glaucoma in Patients Initially Followed up for Elevated Intraocular Pressure.

PURPOSE: To report the lifetime risk of visual impairment resulting from glaucoma in patients originally followed up in a 10-year prospective randomized study initiated in 1981 to assess patients with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). DESIGN: Retrospective patient chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Data on deceased patients who initially were followed up prospectively in the randomized controlled study and thereafter were followed up in ordinary clinical practice were collected until the end of 2017. Inclusion in the original study required an untreated IOP of 22 mmHg or more and 1 or more risk factors for glaucoma. METHODS: Visual impairment, low vision, and blindness were defined according to the World Health Organization criteria. All eyes that became visually impaired were registered, including the date and cause of the impairment; the cumulative incidence of visual impairment corrected for competing risks was calculated; and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the importance of risk factors present at baseline for 1 eye per patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients who became bilaterally visually impaired because of glaucoma, the cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related visual impairment in at least 1 eye, and potential baseline risk factors for visual impairment caused by glaucoma. RESULTS: Seventy-seven of 90 patients (86%) included in the initial randomized study were deceased at the end of 2017. Four patients were lost to follow-up during the clinical follow-up. Of the 77 patients, 7 (9%) became bilaterally visually impaired and 2 of those 7 became bilaterally blind because of glaucoma. The cumulative incidence of glaucoma-induced visual impairment in at least 1 eye increased from 0.00 after 5 years to 0.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.67) after 30 years. The cumulative incidence of glaucoma blindness in at least 1 eye increased from 0.00 after 5 years to 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.54) after 30 years. No specific risk factor significantly increased the risk of visual impairment caused by glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: Although the investigated patients showed elevated IOP and at least 1 additional glaucoma risk factor (i.e., they were high-risk patients), only a relatively small proportion of the patients with glaucoma demonstrated visual impairment.

Making a Correct Diagnosis of Glaucoma: Data From the EMGT.

PRéCIS:: A correct diagnosis of glaucoma established at initial visits. PURPOSE: It has been suggested that a diagnosis of glaucoma cannot be certain until progression has been demonstrated. Our aim was to evaluate the correctness of a glaucoma diagnosis established after 2 initial visits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT) who had continued follow-up for at least 15 years were included in this analysis. The patients had been recruited primarily through a population screening and were diagnosed with glaucoma if the Glaucoma Hemifield Test was outside normal limits in the same sector at two consecutive visits. A Glaucoma Hemifield Test classification of borderline was also diagnostic if corresponding optic disc findings were present. At least one of the following criteria had to be fulfilled during follow-up to confirm the initial diagnosis: (1) visual field progression in at least one eye according to the EMGT criterion; (2) development of manifest glaucoma in an initially ineligible fellow eye; (3) optic disc progression in at least one eye; (4) optic disc hemorrhages in at least 1 eye. RESULTS: Of the 255 patients included in the EMGT, 117 were followed for at least 15 years, representing 147 eyes eligible for our study. During follow-up, 134 eyes (91%) showed visual field progression, and, of the remaining 13 eyes, only 4 (3%) did not fulfill any of the criteria to confirm the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis made applying strict criteria to 2 initial visual field tests, supported by optic disc findings if visual field findings were borderline, was almost always correct.

A New SITA Perimetric Threshold Testing Algorithm: Construction and a Multicenter Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: To describe a new time-saving threshold visual field-testing strategy-Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Faster, which is intended to replace SITA Fast-and to report on a clinical evaluation of this new strategy. DESIGN: Description and validity analysis for modifications applied to SITA Fast. METHODS: Five centers tested 1 eye of each of 126 glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients with SITA Faster, SITA Fast, and SITA Standard at each of 2 visits. Outcomes included test time, mean deviation, and the visual field index (VFI), significant test points in probability maps, and intertest threshold variability. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) test times were 171.9 (45.3) seconds for SITA Faster, 247.0 (56.7) for SITA Fast, and 369.5 (64.5) for SITA Standard (P < .001). SITA Faster test times averaged 30.4 % shorter than SITA Fast and 53.5 % shorter than SITA Standard. Mean deviation was similar among all 3 tests.VFI did not differ between SITA Fast and SITA Faster tests, mean difference 0%, but VFI values were 1.2% lower with SITA Standard compared to both SITA Fast (P = .007) and SITA Faster (P = .002). A similar trend was seen with a slightly higher number of significant test points with SITA Standard than with SITA Fast and SITA Faster. All 3 tests had similar test-retest variability over the entire range of threshold values. CONCLUSIONS: SITA Faster saved considerable test time. SITA Faster and SITA Fast gave almost identical results. There were small differences between SITA Faster and SITA Standard, of the same character as previously shown for SITA Fast vs SITA Standard.

Predicting undetected glaucoma according to age and IOP: a prediction model developed from a primarily European-derived population.

PURPOSE: To model prediction of undetected glaucoma in a predominantly white population, based on intraocular pressure (IOP) and subject age. METHODS: In 1992-1997, a population screening for glaucoma was performed at Malmö University Hospital where individuals between 55-79 years of age (n = 46 614) living in Malmö, were invited to a free eye health examination. Recently examined patients were not invited (n = 4117). IOP and age were recorded for all screened subjects. Subjects who screened positive were further examined to establish or reject a glaucoma diagnosis. We performed multiple regression analysis of the combined effect of age and IOP on the likelihood of undetected glaucoma. RESULTS: In all, 32 918 subjects attended the screening (77.5% of invited), 22 218 women and 11 700 men, while 9579 refrained from participation. Glaucoma was diagnosed in 406 subjects. The proportion of subjects with glaucoma increased exponentially with increasing IOP and older age. Still, the majority of subjects with glaucoma (57%) had ≤IOP 21 mmHg. The predicted rate of undetected glaucoma was low, <5%, for subjects with IOP <25 mmHg, but rose rapidly with higher IOP, reaching 81% in the group with IOP >35 mmHg and age 75-79 years. The model fit well to the data (R2  = 0.97). CONCLUSION: We created a model estimating the combined effect of IOP and age on the likelihood of undetected glaucoma. The model may facilitate case-finding in European-derived populations. Despite the important impact of IOP on the risk of glaucoma, a large proportion of subjects with undetected glaucoma had IOP ≤ 21 mmHg.

Visual outcome is similar in optic neuritis patients treated with oral and i.v. high-dose methylprednisolone: a retrospective study on 56 patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate visual recovery after treatment of acute optic neuritis (ON) with either oral or intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone, in order to establish the best route of administration. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients treated with oral or intravenous high-dose (≥500 mg per day) methylprednisolone for acute ON of unknown or demyelinating etiology. Twenty-eight patients were included in each treatment group. Visual acuity was measured with the Snellen letter chart, color vision with Boström-Kugelberg pseudo-isochromatic plates, and visual field with a Humphrey Field Analyzer. RESULTS: The treatment results were similar in the two groups at follow-up, with no significant difference in visual acuity (p = 0.54), color vision (p = 0.18), visual field mean deviation (p = 0.39) or the number of highly significantly depressed test points (p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The results show no clinical disadvantage of using oral high-dose corticosteroids compared to intravenous administration in the treatment of acute ON, which would facilitate the clinical management of these patients.

Initial intraocular pressure reduction by mono- versus multi-therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma: results from the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study.

PURPOSE: To study newly diagnosed glaucoma patients given mono- or multi-therapy regarding differences in initial intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, target IOP levels reached and influence of untreated baseline IOP on IOP reduction. METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with manifest primary open-angle glaucoma and included in the Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) were randomized to immediate intensive treatment with any of three different IOP-lowering substances supplied in two bottles plus 360° laser trabeculoplasty or to conventional stepwise treatment starting with a single-drug. Intraocular pressure reduction was analysed 1 month after initiation of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients (143 eyes) received mono-therapy and 122 patients (152 eyes) multi-therapy. Median baseline IOP was 24.0 (min: 9.7, max: 56.0) mmHg in mono-therapy eyes and 24.0 (min: 12.3, max: 48.5) mmHg in multi-therapy eyes (p = 0.56). After 1 month in the two groups, respectively, values for median IOP reduction were 6.3 (range: -5.3-31.0) and 11.0 (range: 0.7-34.5) mmHg, and for mean relative decline 26.8 (range: -32.0-55.4) and 46.0 (range: 4.6-81.6) % (p = 0.000). A larger proportion of the multi-therapy patients reached each target IOP level (p = 0.000). The higher the baseline IOP, the larger the observed pressure reduction, considering both absolute and relative figures. The effect was more pronounced in eyes with multi-therapy than in those with mono-therapy (p = 0.000). For every mmHg higher IOP at baseline, the IOP was reduced by an additional 0.56 (mono-therapy) or 0.84 (multi-therapy) mmHg. CONCLUSION: Intensive treatment led to considerably greater IOP reduction than mono-therapy. Among patients with IOP ≥30 mmHg at diagnosis an IOP of <16 was reached in 2/3 of those with multi-therapy but in none with mono-therapy. The IOP reduction was highly dependent on the untreated IOP level.

The Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS), a randomized clinical trial: design, methodology and baseline data.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the ongoing Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) is to evaluate the effectiveness of immediate intensive treatment in comparison with the commonly recommended stepped regimen on the predicted visual field. The two treatment arms are also being compared regarding quality of life (QoL), intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, frequency of reported side-effects, adverse events and adherence to prescribed treatment. DESIGN: A randomized, two-centre, prospective open-labelled treatment trial for open-angle glaucoma. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 40-78 years with previously untreated and newly diagnosed glaucoma with early to moderate visual field loss were eligible. METHODS: Patients were randomized to initial treatment either using drug monotherapy in accordance with common glaucoma guidelines or using a more intensive approach including eyedrops containing drugs from three different classes combined with 360° laser trabeculoplasty. The patients are to be followed for 5 years at visits including standard automated perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OPT) and tonometry. Change of treatment is allowed and decided upon jointly with the patient as in conventional glaucoma management. MAIN OUTCOME: The estimated predicted preserved visual field and QoL at end of expected lifetime. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients, 45% females, mean age 68 years, were randomized. The median untreated IOP was 24 mm Hg, and the median visual field index (VFI), indicating the percentage of a full field, was 92%. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study is a clinical trial in which two groups of patients randomized to different initial intensities of IOP-reducing treatment are being compared with regard to rate of visual field progression and prediction of serious glaucomatous visual field loss at estimated at end of life.