Erectile dysfunction post-perineal anastomotic urethroplasty for traumatic urethral injuries: analysis of incidence and possibility of recovery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) and recoverability of erectile function (EF) after anastomotic urethroplasty for traumatic urethral injuries (TUIs) of different etiologies. METHODS: A retrospective review for patients' records underwent perineal anastomotic urethroplasty for TUIs from June 1998 to January 2014 was conducted. Those patients were contacted and evaluated using the International Index of erectile function questionnaire in sexually active men, and in unmarried men, the single-question self-report of ED was used. Patients with ED underwent penile color Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: Overall, 81 patients were included in the study. The incidences of ED following urethroplasty for TUIs were 72.3, 35.3 and 0% in cases due to pelvic fracture, straddle and iatrogenic injuries, respectively. None of the patients reported deterioration of EF after urethroplasty. Seven (13.5%) patients reported recovery of their EF within 2 years after trauma. The probability of recovery of EF after PFUI was 9% compared to 28.6 and 100% in patients with straddle and iatrogenic urethral injuries, respectively. Patients with type C pelvic fracture had no chance for EF recoverability. CONCLUSIONS: PFUIs have a probability of causing ED as much as 72% compared to 35 and 0% in men with straddle and iatrogenic urethral injuries, respectively. Anastomotic urethroplasty has no deleterious effect on EF. A tendency for higher recoverability of EF could be observed after iatrogenic urethral injuries followed by straddle injury then PFUIs. The probability of recovery decreased proportionally with severity of pelvic trauma.

Ejaculatory function after anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injuries.

PURPOSE: The effect of anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUIs) on ejaculatory profile is under-reported in the literature. There is controversy as regards the effect of bulbocavernous muscle splitting during surgery on ejaculatory function (EjF). We evaluated the effects of anastomotic urethroplasty on EjF using a validated questionnaire. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the computerized surgical records to identify patients who underwent anastomotic posterior urethroplasty for PFUIs from June 1998 to January 2014. Those patients were retrieved and evaluated for their EjF using the EjF component of the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ). RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 31.6 years. All patients except one have antegrade ejaculation, and according to the overall ejaculatory score, only 5 patients (8.6%) reported ejaculatory dysfunction and the remaining 53 (91.4%) had good or average EjF. Ten men (17.2%) reported decreased volume and force of ejaculate. Decreased pleasure during ejaculation was the commonest ejaculatory disorder (39.6%). The score of each of the seven ejaculatory questions among the study patients was in harmony to the previous study of anterior urethroplasty except that men in this study had higher ejaculatory frequency and latency. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all men maintained antegrade ejaculation after posterior urethroplasty for PFUIs. The risk of urethral reconstruction and splitting the bulbocavernous muscle on ejaculation seems to be minimal.