Impact of the new molecular classification of endometrial cancer: A French cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of the latest ESGO guidelines for endometrial cancer with molecular classification on the management strategy in a French cohort. METHODS: All patients treated between January 1st, 2014 and December 31, 2020 for an endometrial cancer at the Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil (CHIC, FRANCE) were selected from our prospectively maintained database. All postoperative samples were reviewed to confirm histological subtype, myometrial infiltration, cytonuclear grade and presence of lymphovascular emboli. Analysis of p53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 genes was performed by immunohistochemistry first then a systematic POLE sequencing was performed to identify gene mutation. The impact of the latest ESGO 2020 guidelines was assessed regarding adjuvant therapy, surgical strategy, and survival. RESULTS: Eighty patients were analyzed, including 70% NSMP (n = 56), 13.75% MSI (n = 11), 10% p53 mutated (n = 8) and 6.25% POLEmut (n = 5). A total of 21 patients (26.3%) were reclassified using the latest ESGO classification. Patients classified at low risk or with advanced / metastatic disease were not reclassified using molecular analysis. Molecular analysis and the latest ESGO classification had the most important impact on patients initially classified at intermediate - high risk that were reclassified in intermediate (10/23) and in low (4/23) risk. Nine patients (11.3%) were overtreated according to the 2020 ESGO classification: six patients in the low - risk group (4 received vaginal brachytherapy and 2 external radiotherapy) and three in the intermediate risk group (3 received external irradiation and 1 received chemotherapy). None of the patients in our cohort would have been undertreated using the 2020 ESGO classification. Patients within the p53 mutated group were the most likely to experience recurrence (37.5%, 3/8) and none of the patients POLE mutated recurred. CONCLUSION: Around one in 4 patients were reclassified in a more accurate prognostic group using molecular diagnosis and the latest ESGO guidelines which could decrease the use of adjuvant therapies to spare morbidity.

Surgical Determinants of Post Operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Adnexectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the main surgical factors associated with postoperative pains in patients undergoing adnexectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients that underwent adnexectomy in two French Gynecological centers between July, 2018 and March, 2020 were prospectively included and retrospectively analyzed. The main pre and per operative surgical factors were analyzed to assess their impact on immediate postoperative pain. Analgesic consumption was recorded for each patient and pain was evaluated using the validated numeric rating scale (ranging between 0 and 10). RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients underwent laparoscopic adnexectomy. Eighty-four patients (72%) experienced either no or minor postoperative pain (NRS ≤ 2). Seventeen patients (14.5%) required strong opioids (subcutaneous morphine injection) in the immediate postoperative period. The only two parameters that had a significant impact on immediate postoperative pain were the realization of a fascia closure and the duration of pneumoperitoneum longer than 60 minutes. Pneumoperitoneum pressure and size of ports were not significantly correlated with postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Fascia closure and increased surgical time were significantly associated with immediate postoperative pain and the need for strong opioids consumption. Surgical training to limit prolonged surgeries should be strongly emphasized to lower postoperative pain and limit opioids consumption.

Assessment of patient burden from dry eye disease using a combination of five visual analogue scales and a radar graph: a pilot study of the PENTASCORE.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dry eye disease (DED) questionnaires would ideally be easy and fast to answer and explore the main aspects of disease burden and satisfaction (efficacy and tolerability) with treatment. This pilot study evaluates the Pentascore questionnaire for routinely assessing DED. METHODS: The Pentascore combines five visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess the intensity and frequency of ocular pain/discomfort, the impact of DED on daily activities and visual tasks and the efficacy and tolerability of ongoing DED treatment(s). This retrospective study compared Pentascore to the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, fluorescein tear break-up-time, corneal staining and Schirmer I test. RESULTS: For 161 DED patients, the algebraic mean (±SE) for the Pentascore was 52.6±1.8, the mean standardised area of the radar graph was 32.1±1.7 (out of 100) and the mean score for the OSDI was 52.6±1.8. Both questionnaires were highly statistically correlated (R=0.74 for both algebraic score and radar area, p<0.001), and each of five Pentascore VAS was significantly correlated with the OSDI (p<0.05). Corneal staining score (CSS) was correlated with two Pentascore VAS (impact of DED on daily activities and visual tasks), and there was a trend towards a correlation between CSS and the area of the radar graph (p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that the Pentascore can rapidly and effectively assess the burden of DED and satisfaction with treatments. Compared with the algebraic mean, the estimation of the area of the radar graph likely improves the sensitivity for detecting differences/changes in symptoms and treatment follow-up.