RESUMO
The pathophysiology of diabetic nephropathy (DN) is too complex and involves a variety of pathways and mediators. Hyperglycaemia and dyslipidemia are identified as major risk factors for diabetic nephropathy. Various studies revealed the fact that dyslipidemia is a major contributor to the process of diabetic nephropathy. Dyslipidemia refers to abnormal lipid levels. Lipids like LDL, free fatty acids, abnormal lipoproteins, ceramides, etc., are unsafe for kidneys. They target proximal tubular epithelial cells, podocytes, and tubulointerstitial tissues through biochemical changes, especially by enhancing the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation, endorsing tissue inflammation and mitochondrial damage, which give rise to nephropathy. Major lipid targets identified are SREBP1, LXR, FXR PPAR, CD-36, PKc, AGE/RAGE pathway, and ferroptosis. The drug acting on these targets has shown improvement in DN patients. Various preclinical and clinical studies support the fact that hyperlipidemic agents are promising targets for DN. Therefore, in conjunction with other standard therapies, drugs acting on dyslipidemia can be added as a part of the regimen in order to prevent the incidence of ESRD and CVD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/2019-nCoV). Though many classes of drugs have been advocated/used for the treatment of this disease, vaccines are being targeted for its ultimate prevention. Indian Government has approved Covishield (ChAdOx1 nCoV19 Corona Virus Vaccine-Recombinant) for restricted use in emergency circumstances. OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the safety profile of the Covishield vaccine among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: All Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) reported to the ADR monitoring centre by healthcare workers who received the Covishield vaccine during the study period of 3 months were analysed on various parameters, and the assessment was done using the WHO-UMC scale. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1216 beneficiaries were vaccinated with 1st dose of Covishield, and out of these, 727 beneficiaries also received 2nd dose of the vaccine. Out of the 1216 beneficiaries vaccinated, 69 ADRs were reported in 24 healthcare workers. The most common ADR reported was fever (24.64%), followed by myalgia (18.84%). No death or any serious anaphylactic reaction was observed. None of the healthcare workers experienced any adverse event during the observation period of 30 minutes. Serious reactions were reported in 4 healthcare workers as per the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) criteria of serious AEFI. 92% of healthcare workers recovered from ADRs during the study period. 84% of ADRs were classified as probable as per the WHO-UMC scale. CONCLUSION: As per the Government of India directives, all the healthcare workers in the institute were encouraged to take both doses of the Covishield vaccine. The beneficiaries were kept under observation for 30 minutes and monitored for any adverse drug reaction following vaccination. The vaccine was found to be safe with a very low incidence of ADRs.
