RESUMO
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the operative and postoperative outcomes of the mandibular impacted third molar removal using piezoelectric technique and conventional rotary bur technique. Settings: The study was conducted in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery between January 1, 2019, and January 1, 2020. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, with an age of 18-40 years, with asymptomatic bilateral impacted mandibular third molars, were selected for the study and randomly surgical extraction was done either using piezoelectric or the conventional rotary bur technique on each site. The intraoperative time taken, postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus were assessed over a follow-up period of 7 days postoperatively. Results: Study and control groups were compared using paired t-test. There was statistical significance in reduction of pain and swelling in the study group where the duration of surgery was increased in the study group. Conclusion: Even if piezoelectric technique takes more time but can be used safely as another technique to conventional surgical method with surgical bur and handpiece for removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
RESUMO
Introduction: In oral cavity, saliva is a physiological fluid present in the oral cavity. Oral fluid is an absolute media exploring for health and disease surveillance. Saliva is a complex fluid. Xerostomia is the subjective complain of dryness in the oral cavity due to decreased salivary flow. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an established physical therapy, which is useful for the pain relief. Materials and Methods: A total of 25 subjects of xerostomia and 25 age and sex matched normal subjects visiting the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Pacific Dental College and Hospital were included in the study. For patients with positive mirror stick test unstimulated saliva were collected with 'low forced spitting' method in a graduated test tube for 5 minutes. Individuals with unstimulated salivary flow equal to or less than 0.5 mL per 5 min were included in the study group (xerostomia) and individuals with salivary flow more than 0.5 mL per 5 min were included in the control group (age and sex matched). The TENS unit were then activated and intensity control switch were gradually increased to tolerable level of patient for 15 min. At this optimal intensity, stimulated saliva were collected for 5 min with same method in a separate graduated test tube and flow rate were compared with unstimulated salivary flow rate. Same were done with 25 control patients. Results: The data thus obtained was subjected to statistical analysis. The following findings were observed in the study. There was increase salivary flow rate in xerostomic individuals after TENS application. More improvement was found in inter appointment salivary flow than two follow-ups. Healthy group showed more improvement than xerostomia after TENS therapy Known cases of diabetes mellitus patients with xerostomia revealed more improvement than other etiologies of xerostomia included in this study. Conclusion: This present study has an important therapeutic value in the treatment of patients with xerostomia. TENS therapy was highly effective in stimulating whole salivary flow. The encouraging results of this present study indicate that TENS has the potential to increase salivary flow rate and can be an important alternative in the xerostomia treatment.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The basic idea of a root canal treatment is to alleviate the pain and heal the infection within the infected tooth, which can be resolved in a single visit or multiple visits in root canal therapy. Therefore, in this article, an in vivo comparison of single visits and multiple visits using different rotation and speed for two Protaper universal design file systems is done on the basis of time taken and incidence of pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred single-rooted premolars with irreversible symptomatic pulpitis were assigned to two groups of 50 patients each using the odd-even method, GA to be treated endodontically in a single visit and GB to be treated endodontically in multiple visits. Each group was further divided into two subgroups of 25 patients each on the basis of two different variations of speed and rotation for two Protaper file systems of the same design, GA1 (Hand Protapers) and GA2 (Rotary Protapers), GB1 (Hand Protapers) and GB2 (Rotary Protapers), respectively. After proper biomechanical shaping and cleaning, obturation was done with Gutta-percha cones and Ah plus sealer using Fast Pack obturation pen for warm vertical compaction. The pain was measured by a 100 mm modified visual analogue scale, and time was measured using a stopwatch. RESULTS: At 6-h intervals, post-obturation pain was more in single-visit root canal therapy than multiple-visit root canal therapy (P < 0.01). Single-visit rotary Protaper (GA2) had less incidence of post-obturation pain as compared with single-visit hand protapers (GA1) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in post-obturation pain in the multiple-visit hand protaper subgroup (GB1) and multiple-visit rotary protaper subgroup (GB2) (P > 0.05). Preoperative pain significantly influences the post-obturation pain. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 17.0 statistical Analysis Software. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of preoperative pain can significantly influence the presence of postoperative pain. Most of the pain in both single-visit and multiple-visits root canal therapy occurred in the first 48 h after obturation, which decreases thereafter. Single-visit rotary protaper (GA2) had less incidence of post-obturation pain as compared with single-visit hand protapers (GA1). There was no significant difference in post-obturation pain in the multiple-visit hand protaper subgroup (GB1) and multiple-visit rotary protaper subgroup (GB2). Presence of sealer puff influences the duration of pain.
