Mid-term to long-term outcome of the open Bankart repair for recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of the open Bankart repair for traumatic, recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder by evaluation of recurrence, range of motion, return to sports, arthritis, patient satisfaction, and outcome measures. METHODS: Of 162 patients, 127 patients (mean age, 31 years) were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 17.1 years (5-24) after undergoing an open Bankart repair using suture anchors. An independent orthopedic surgeon obtained a history and examined each for range of motion. Radiographs for arthritis and osteolysis were obtained unless the patient refused. Questionnaires including return to sports and function as well as satisfaction and outcome measures were completed by all patients. RESULTS: There was 1 recurrent dislocation (0.8%) and 1 recurrent subluxation (0.8%) but no pain or apprehension. All remaining shoulders were stable. Compared with the normal shoulder, there was statistical difference in external rotation in abduction and at the side as well as in internal rotation but not in forward elevation or abduction. However, no patient considered any measurable loss functionally significant. Of 107 patients who participated in sports, 98 returned to the sport; 7 of the remaining 9 discontinued for reasons other than the shoulder. There were 91 patients who agreed to radiography; 48 had normal findings, 34 had mild arthrosis, 9 had moderate arthrosis, and none had severe arthrosis. Mean postoperative outcome scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 93.53; Rowe, 91.41; and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 327.7. There were 125 patients who were satisfied and would undergo the procedure again. CONCLUSION: The open Bankart procedure remains the standard by which other techniques can be measured for treatment of recurrent, traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder.

Management of knee articular cartilage injuries in athletes: chondroprotection, chondrofacilitation, and resurfacing.

UNLABELLED: Articular cartilage defects of the knee are common among athletes where the physical demands of sport result in significant stresses on joints. Chondral defects are associated with pain and functional impairment that limit sporting participation and may progress to joint degeneration and frank arthritis. Management of established chondral lesions aims to allow athletes to return to high-impact sports and can be considered in terms of protection of existing cartilage, chondrofacilitation, and resurfacing. Repaired and regenerated cartilage must closely resemble and function like normal hyaline cartilage, and this ability may be the most significant factor for the return to sport. Based on our experiences and the available literature, we outline how athletes can best protect their cartilage, how physicians can facilitate intrinsic repair of established lesions, and which methods of cartilage restoration or resurfacing should be used in different situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Anatomic Description of the Origin of the Proximal Hamstring.

PURPOSE: To define the topographic anatomy of the footprint of the hamstrings origin on the ischium. METHODS: Dissection of the hamstrings origin in 6 cadaveric pelvises was performed. The hamstrings origin was isolated with sharp dissection, and it was noted whether the semimembranosus had a separate attachment or whether there was one confluent tendon attached at the footprint. The common hamstrings tendon was then sharply dissected from the ischium, and the footprint was outlined with surgical marker followed by radiopaque paint. Paint was prepared by mixing 0.25 g Daler-Rowney acrylic artists ink scarlet no. 567 (Daler-Rowney, Bracknell, England) per gram of EZ-HD 98% v/w barium sulfate (E-Z-EM Inc, Lake Success, NY). The paint was then applied to the area of the footprint, and the specimen underwent a 0.5-mm-slice computed tomographic (CT) scan of the pelvis with 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. Vitrea (Vital Images, Minnetonka, MN) software was used to determine the surface area of the ligament footprint as well as the distance from the ischial tuberosity to the center of the footprint. The thickness of the bone underlying the footprint was measured. Data are presented as means ± standard error. RESULTS: Five of 6 specimens had a common hamstrings tendon, whereas one had a separate attachment for the semimembranosus. The semimembranosus joined the common hamstrings tendon 2.33 ± 0.61 cm distal to the footprint. The average surface area of the hamstrings footprint measured 10.19 ± 0.75 cm(2). The distance from the tip of the ischial tuberosity to the center of the hamstrings footprint measured 3.73 ± 0.22 cm. The average thickness of the bone deep to the footprint was 3.77 ± 0.9 cm. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a topographic description of the origin of the hamstrings footprint and may assist surgeons in performing anatomic reattachment of this tendon. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our data will assist surgeons in performing anatomic repair of proximal hamstrings avulsions.

Open Bankart repair for revision of failed prior stabilization: outcome analysis at a mean of more than 10 years.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of open Bankart repair for failed stabilization surgery at a mean follow-up of >10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients underwent revision open Bankart repair by a single surgeon for failed prior stabilization surgery, with a standard technique and postoperative rehabilitation. All patients were referred by other surgeons. Evaluation was by an independent examiner, at a mean follow-up of 10.2 years. Evaluation included a history, physical examination for range of motion, outcome scores, recurrence, return to athletics, and radiographic examination. RESULTS: All cases had persistent Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions. Failures included 14 patients with a failed single arthroscopic Bankart repair; 1 patient with 2 failed arthroscopic Bankart repairs; 1 patient with an arthroscopic failure and an open Bankart repair; 7 patients with failed open Bankart repairs; and 1 patient with a failed open Bankart repair, then a failed arthroscopic attempt. Two patients had had thermal capsulorrhaphy; 2 others had staple capsulorrhaphy, 1 with an open capsular shift and 1 after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair, an open Bankart repair, and then a coracoid transfer. All arthroscopic Bankart repairs had anchors placed medial and superior on the glenoid neck. Mean motion loss compared with the normal contralateral side was as follows: elevation 1.15°, abduction 4.2°, external rotation at the side 3.2°, external rotation in abduction 5.1°, and internal rotation 0.6 vertebral levels (NS). No patient had an apprehension sign, pain, or instability. Of 23 who played sports, 22 resumed after. Outcomes scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 89.44; Rowe, 86.67; Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 476.26. On radiographic examination, there were 13 normal radiographs and 7 with mild, 2 with moderate, and 0 with severe arthritic changes. CONCLUSION: The open Bankart repair offers a reliable, consistently successful option for revision of failed stabilizations.

Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers.

BACKGROUND: A number of surgical approaches are utilized in total hip arthroplasty. It has been hypothesized that the anterior approach results in less muscle damage than the posterior approach. We prospectively analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage and inflammation in patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with an anterior or posterior approach to provide objective evidence of the local soft-tissue injury at the time of arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients treated with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach and twenty-eight patients treated with the same procedure through a posterior approach were prospectively analyzed. Perioperative and radiographic data were collected to ensure cohorts with similar characteristics. Serum creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a) levels were measured preoperatively, in the post-anesthesia-care unit (except for the CRP level), and on postoperative days 1 and 2. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to make comparisons between the two groups. Independent predictors of elevation in levels of markers of inflammation and muscle damage were determined with use of multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The levels of the markers of inflammation were slightly decreased in the direct-anterior-approach group as compared with those in the posterior-approach group. The rise in the CK level in the posterior-approach group was 5.5 times higher than that in the anterior-approach group in the post-anesthesia-care unit (mean difference, 150.3 units/L [95% CI, 70.4 to 230.2]; p < 0.05) and nearly twice as high cumulatively (mean difference, 305.0 units/L [95% CI, -46.7 to 656.8]; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the anterior total hip arthroplasty approach used in this study caused significantly less muscle damage than did the posterior surgical approach, as indicated by serum CK levels. The clinical importance of the rise in the CK level needs to be delineated by additional clinical studies. The overall physiologic burden, as demonstrated by measurement of inflammation marker levels, appears to be similar between the anterior and posterior approaches. Objective measurement of muscle damage and inflammation markers provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty.

Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopic findings of stability in juvenile osteochondritis dissecans.

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to characterize the stability of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) fragments in juveniles. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent surgery for OCD between 2004 and 2008. Of these, 23 patients had adequate preoperative imaging. There were 14 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 12.9 years. Of the 23 lesions, 21 were located in the knee and 2 were located in the talus. On the basis of MRI, a single radiologist (1) indicated the presence or absence of 4 established magnetic resonance signs of instability, (2) classified each lesion according to a staging system for OCD stability, and (3) described the lesion as stable or unstable. These findings were compared with the arthroscopic findings. Arthroscopy was considered the gold standard for diagnosing fragment stability. RESULTS: Of the OCD lesions, 13 were found to be stable and 10 were found to be unstable. The final MRI impression was unstable in 21 patients and stable in 2 patients. This yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 15% for diagnosing fragment instability. When 2 or more criteria were present, the specificity of MRI to classify lesion instability improved to 92%. The sensitivity, however, dropped to 50%. Concordance between arthroscopic stage and MRI stage was 30% (7 of 23). CONCLUSIONS: MRI predicted 21 of 23 lesions to be unstable, whereas arthroscopy found only 10 of these 23 lesions to be unstable. The most common pattern of false-positive findings involved lesions with an area of high signal intensity at the bone-fragment interface. MRI should not be used in isolation to determine lesion instability in young patients with juvenile OCD.

Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus intralaminar C2 fixation in C2-C6 subaxial constructs.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative rigidity of C2 transpedicular versus intralaminar fixation with and without offset connectors in C2-C6 subaxial constructs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Insufficient biomechanical data exists on C2 laminar fixation in subaxial constructs, and no study has considered C2-C6 subaxial constructs or the use of offset connectors. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spines underwent rigidity testing in the intact condition and after a destabilizing C3-C6 laminectomy. Specimens were instrumented with 20 mm pedicle and 20 mm intralaminar screws at C2, and with 14 mm lateral mass screws from C3-C6. In random order, three conditions (C2 pedicle screws, C2 laminar screws, and C2 laminar screws with offset connectors) were tested in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. RESULTS: Laminar screws in C2-C6 constructs were equivalent to transpedicular fixation in flexion-extension (P = 0.985), were significantly more rigid than pedicle screws in axial rotation (P = 0.002), and were significantly less rigid than pedicle screws in lateral bending (P = 0.002). Laminar screw constructs were more rigid than the intact condition in all planes.