Successful pregnancy in a recipient of an ABO-incompatible renal allograft.

Kidney transplantation restores fertility in patients with end-stage renal disease, with many successful pregnancies after kidney transplantation being reported. However, there are little data regarding pregnancy in women transplanted under modern-era desensitisation protocols that utilise rituximab, plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, including ABO-incompatible transplants. Pregnancies in ABO-incompatible recipients can pose new challenges from an immunological perspective. Here, we report a case of successful pregnancy using in vitro fertilisation, in a renal transplant recipient who underwent desensitisation two years prior, that included use of rituximab and plasma exchange to receive an ABO-incompatible transplant from her husband and subsequent father of the baby. We believe this was the first case of successful pregnancy after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in Australia and New Zealand. This case also highlights the difficulties faced in conception following transplantation and demonstrates that in vitro fertilisation utilising ovulation induction can be successfully utilised for conception in this cohort. This recipient also had gestational diabetes, worsening renal function and preterm delivery which are important complications often seen in pregnancies of solid organ transplant recipients.

Angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibody (AT1Rab) associated humoral rejection and the effect of peri operative plasma exchange and candesartan.

Angiotensin II type 1 antibodies (AT1Rab) can mediate antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Pre transplant AT1Rab levels, and risk of rejection were assessed in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTR) transplanted in our centre from 2013 to 2014 (n=145). 14/145 (9.7%) KTR experienced antibody mediated rejection (AMR). The Hazard Ratio for AMR=3.7 [95% CI 2-26] (p=0.009) for KTR with AT1Rab levels >17.5U/ml. 6/11 of KTR with levels >25U/ml experienced AMR. In 2015 (n=80) KTR were transplanted and 6/80 KTR experienced rejection (2 AMR and 4 TCMR with vascular lesions). 7/80 of KTR had AT1Rab 17.5-25U/ml and none experienced rejection and were induced with ATG and candesartan. 7/80 had AT1Rab 25-40U/ml and received pre and post-operative plasma exchange, ATG and candesartan and 1/7 experienced TCMR with a vascular lesion. This perioperative regimen may alter the risk of rejection in patients with high levels of AT1Ab and further studies are needed.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody precipitating acute vascular rejection in kidney transplantation.

Atypical non HLA antibodies are increasingly recognised as causes of immunological injury in allotransplantation. In this report we describe a non HLA sensitized male renal allograft recipient who developed acute vascular rejection on a "for cause" biopsy (Banff v2, g2, ptc 3) at day 4 post first renal allograft in the presence of elevated angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab level 14.1). The acute rejection was treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG × 6), plasma exchange (1.5 plasma volume replacement x6) and oral candesartan. Serum creatinine improved and follow up biopsy confirmed resolution of rejection following treatment. AT1R-Ab should be considered when rejection is diagnosed in the absence of HLA antibodies.

Desensitization for renal transplantation: depletion of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, preservation of memory antibodies, and clinical risks.

Desensitization protocols reduce donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) and enable renal transplantation in patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxic cross-match (CDC-CXM). The effect of this treatment on protective antibody and immunoglobulin levels is unknown. Thirteen patients with end-stage renal disease, DSA and positive CDC-CXM underwent desensitization. Sera collected pre- and post-transplantation were analysed for anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total immunoglobulin (Ig) levels and IgG subclasses and were compared to healthy controls and contemporaneous renal transplant recipients treated with standard immunosuppression alone. Ten patients developed negative CDC-CXM and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and underwent successful transplantation. Eight recipients achieved good graft function without antibody-mediated or late rejection, BK virus or cytomegalovirus infection. One patient had primary non-function due to recurrent oxalosis, and one patient with immediate graft function died from septicaemia. Seven recipients required post-operative transfusion and three developed septicaemia. DSA remained negative by ELISA at 12 months, but were detectable by Luminex(®) . Anti-tetanus and anti-pneumococcal antibodies, total Ig and IgG subclasses were below the normal range but comparable to levels in renal transplant recipients who had not undergone desensitization. Desensitization protocols effectively reduce DSA and allow successful transplantation. Post-operative bleeding and short-term infectious risk is increased. Protective antibody and serum immunoglobulin levels are relatively preserved.