Assessing Reuse of Hypodermic Needles in Mice by means of Digital Imaging, Photomicrography, Bacterial Culture, Analysis of Nest Building, and Animal Vocalization.

Hypodermic needles are sometimes reused in animal research settings to preserve the viability of and to conserve limited quantities of injected material. However, the reuse of needles is strongly discouraged in human medicine to prevent inju- ries and the spread of infectious disease. No official guidelines prohibit needle reuse in veterinary medicine, although the practice may be discouraged. We hypothesized that reused needles would be significantly more blunt than unused needles and that reuse for additional injections would cause more animal stress. To test these ideas, we evaluated mice that were injected subcutaneously in the flank or mammary fat pad to generate cell line xenograft and mouse allograft models. Needles were reused up to 20 times, based on an IACUC-approved protocol. A subset of reused needles was digitally imaged to determine needle dullness based on the area of deformation from the secondary bevel angle; this parameter was not different between new needles and needles that had been reused 20 times. In addition, the number of times a needle was reused was not significantly related to audible mouse vocalization during injection. Finally, nest building scores for mice that were injected with a needle used 0 through 5 times were similar to those of mice injected with a needle had been used 16 through 20 times. Among the 37 reused needles that were tested, 4 were positive for bacterial growth; the only organisms cultured were Staphylococcus spp. Contrary to our hypothesis, reusing needles for subcutaneous injections did not increase animal stress based on analysis of vocalization or nest building.

Using Filter Media and Soiled Bedding in Disposable Individually Ventilated Cages as a Refinement to Specific Pathogen-free Mouse Health Monitoring Programs.

Molecular-based methods have shown potential for improving pathogen detection and reducing animal use. While increasing evidence supports rodent-free environmental health PCR pathogen detection, limited information is available regarding efficacy for disposable individually ventilated caging systems. In such systems, testing of plenum exhaust air dust is ineffective, and the use of collection media is optimal. We performed a series of studies to compare PCR infectious agent detection with dust collected on media placed in a mouse-free soiled bedding cage, the cage exhaust filter of an occupied sentinel cage, and direct sampling from colony and sentinel mice with traditional soiled bedding mouse sentinels. We hypothesized that after a 3-mo period, testing of filter media agitated in a soiled bedding cage would be equal to or more sensitive than more traditional methods. Agitated media detected Astrovirus-1, segmented filamentous bacteria and Helicobacter ganmani to a degree comparable to testing lid exhaust filter PCR from a sentinel mouse cage, but opportunists such as Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis were not detected consistently, and H. hepaticus was not detected at all. Direct sampling of pooled fecal pellets and body swabs from sentinel mice and testing using PCR also failed to reliably detect opportunists and Helicobacter spp. While further work is needed to refine use of filter media in soiled bedding for detection of lower prevalence opportunists, this report provides evidence that a rodent-free method of reliably detecting murine agents in a disposable individually ventilated cage system with cage-level filtration outperforms direct sampling of soiled bedding sentinel mice.

Comparison of Nociceptive Effects of Buprenorphine, Firocoxib, and Meloxicam in a Plantar Incision Model in Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Due to their reduced frequency of dosing and ease of availability, NSAIDs are generally preferred over opioids for rodent analgesia. We evaluated the efficacy of the highly COX2-selective NSAID firocoxib as compared with meloxicam and buprenorphine for reducing allodynia and hyperalgesia in rats in a plantar incision model of surgical pain. After a preliminary pharmacokinetic study using firocoxib, Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 12 per group, 6 of each sex) were divided into 6 groups: no surgery (anesthesia only), saline (surgery but no analgesia), buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg SC every 8 h), meloxicam (2 mg/kg SC every 24 h), and 2 dosages of firocoxib (10 and 20 mg/kg SC every 24 h). The nociception assays were performed by using von Frey and Hargreaves methodology to test mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. These assays were performed at 24 h before and at 20, 28, 44, and 52 h after start of surgery. None of the analgesics used in this study produced significantly different responses in allodynia or hyperalgesia from those of saline-treated rats. In the Hargreaves assay, female saline-treated rats experienced significantly greater hyperalgesia than did males. These findings add to a growing body of literature suggesting that commonly used dosages of analgesics may not provide sufficient analgesia in rats experiencing incisional pain.