Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nucl Med Commun ; 33(11): 1153-9, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22922735

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical accuracy of hardware-based single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) registration in the upper abdomen and neck. METHODS: The database consisted of 90 patients referred for SPECT/CT for diagnostic workup of either thyroid/parathyroid disease (n=46) or abdominal neuroendocrine tumours (n=44). In the first group, 99mTc-MIBI was used as the tracer and in the second 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (n=13), 111In-octreotide (n=28) or 99mTc-octreotide (n=3). For predefined structures represented by both modalities, the distances between the centres of gravity of their CT and SPECT representation were determined in a semiautomated manner. In cervical data sets, this analysis was performed for the submandibular salivary glands (n=92) and in abdominal data sets for 69 neoplastic foci. RESULTS: The mean distances were 5.7 ± 2.0 mm (range: 1.84-9.67 mm) in the neck and 6.8 ± 3.3 mm (range: 1.4-19.7 mm) in the abdomen. In 42 out of 92 of the cervical and 40 out of 69 of the abdominal data sets at least one of the X-direction-determined, Y-direction-determined, and Z-direction-determined distances was greater than the SPECT pixel width of 4.6 mm. CONCLUSION: The anatomical accuracy of hardware-based SPECT/CT fusion depends also on the region of the body studied. For example, in the neck and upper abdomen the accuracy is lower than in the lower lumbar spine. In clinical routine, SPECT/CT data sets acquired for the neck and upper abdomen should be regularly checked and corrected for SPECT/CT misalignment. This is, in particular, important when CT-based corrections of SPECT involving pixelwise data integration such as for attenuation correction are made.


Assuntos
Abdome/anatomia & histologia , Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Pescoço/anatomia & histologia , Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Tomografia Computadorizada Espiral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Tomada de Decisões Assistida por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Software , Adulto Jovem
2.
Comput Med Imaging Graph ; 32(5): 388-95, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18468862

RESUMO

Hybrid scanners, which enable the performance of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and X-ray computed tomography (CT) in one imaging session, have considerable diagnostic potential. However, evaluating the anatomical accuracy of image fusion inherent to these systems remains a challenge. This paper proposes a method for evaluating this variable with minimum user interaction. It focuses on measuring the distance between the centers of gravity of the SPECT hot spot and its counterpart in the CT image. A localized maximally stable extremal regions method is proposed to automatically segment SPECT hot spots, while the corresponding CT structures are segmented by the semi-automatic random walk method, based on a fast multigrid solver. Accuracy and reproducibility of the validation method have been preliminary confirmed by the test with 21 clinical data-sets.


Assuntos
Algoritmos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Técnica de Subtração , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...