Fertility outcomes several years after urgent fertility preservation for patients with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study the fertility outcomes of women who tried to conceive after breast cancer (BC) treatment and fertility preservation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational, bicentric cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with BC. INTERVENTION: All patients who had undergone fertility preservation before BC treatment between January 2013 and July 2019 were included (n = 844). The endpoint date was March 1, 2022. Patients with missing data on pregnancy attempts after a cancer diagnosis (n = 195) were excluded from the pregnancy analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative incidences of pregnancy and live birth (LB) were calculated. For women who became pregnant, the time to conception was calculated between the first fertility preservation consultation and the estimated day of conception. For those who did not conceive, we considered the time between the first fertility preservation consultation and the endpoint date, or the date of patient death. A Cox regression model was used to study the predictive factors for pregnancy and LB. RESULTS: Among the 649 patients with available data on pregnancy attempts after BC diagnosis, 255 (39.3% [35.5-43.2]) tried to conceive (median follow-up of 6.5 years). Overall, 135 (52.9% [46.6-59.2]) of these patients achieved a pregnancy, mainly through unassisted conception (79.3% [72.8-84.8]), and 99 reported an LB (representing 38.8% of patients who attempted conception). In our cohort, 48 months after the first fertility preservation consultation, the cumulative incidence of pregnancy was 33.1% ([27.6-37.9]). After adjustment for age, parity, type of chemotherapy administration, and endocrine therapy, only multiparity at diagnosis and absence of chemotherapy were positive predictive factors of pregnancy after cancer. Of the 793 patients who had vitrified oocytes and embryos, 68 used them (27% [21.3-32.5] of the patients who tried to conceive), resulting in 8 LBs (11.8% [5.2-21.9]). Women who used their cryopreserved oocytes and embryos were older at the first consultation of fertility preservation (hazard ratio 1.71 [1.42-2.21]), and chose more often to vitrify embryos (hazard ratio 1.76 [1.28-2.23]). CONCLUSION: Although pregnancy rates after fertility preservation for patients with BC are low, most conceptions are achieved without medical assistance. Our findings provide useful information to advise women on the different techniques of fertility preservation, their efficacy, and safety, as well as the relatively high chances of unassisted conception.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined simultaneously with oocyte retrieval after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

STUDY QUESTION: Can ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) be performed after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Unilateral oophorectomy after transvaginal oocyte retrieval is feasible on stimulated ovaries during one surgical step. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In the fertility preservation (FP) field, the timeframe between patient referral and start of curative treatment is limited. Combining oocyte pick-up with ovarian tissue (OT) extraction has been reported to improve FP but COH applied before OT extraction is not currently recommended. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This retrospective cohort-controlled study involved 58 patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation immediately followed by OTC between September 2009 and November 2021. The exclusion criteria were a delay between oocyte retrieval and OTC of >24 h (n = 5) and IVM of oocytes obtained ex vivo in the ovarian cortex (n = 2). This FP strategy was performed either after COH (stimulated group, n = 18) or after IVM (unstimulated group, n = 33). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Oocyte retrieval followed by OT extraction on the same day was performed either without previous stimulation or after COH. Adverse effects of surgery and ovarian stimulation, mature oocyte yield and pathology findings of fresh OT were retrospectively analysed. Thawed OTs were analysed prospectively, for vascularization and apoptosis using immunohistochemistry, when patient consent was obtained. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No surgical complication occurred after OTC surgery in either group. In particular, no severe bleeding was associated with COH. The number of mature oocytes obtained increased after COH (median = 8.5 (25% = 5.3-75% = 12.0)) compared to the unstimulated group (2.0 (1.0-5.3), P < 0.001). Neither ovarian follicle density nor cell integrity was affected by COH. Fresh OT analysis showed congestion in half of the stimulated OT which was higher than in the unstimulated OT (3.1%, P < 0.001). COH also increased haemorrhagic suffusion (COH + OTC: 66.7%; IVM + OTC: 18.8%, P = 0.002) and oedema (COH + OTC: 55.6%; IVM + OTC: 9.4%, P < 0.001). After thawing, the pathological findings were similar between both groups. No statistical difference in the number of blood vessels was observed between the groups. The oocyte apoptotic rate in thawed OT was not statistically different between the groups (ratio of positive cleaved caspase-3 staining oocytes/total number of oocytes equal to median 0.50 (0.33-0.85) and 0.45 (0.23-0.58) in unstimulated and stimulated groups respectively, P = 0.720). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study reports FP from a small number of women following OTC. Follicle density and other pathology findings are an estimate only. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Unilateral oophorectomy can be successfully performed after COH with limited bleeding risk and an absence of impact on thawed OT. This approach could be proposed to post pubertal patients when the number of mature oocytes expected is low or when the risk of residual pathology is high. The reduction of surgical steps for cancer patients also has positive implications for introducing this approach into clinical practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was made possible through the support of the reproductive department of Antoine-Béclère Hospital and of the pathological department of Bicêtre Hospital (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France). The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Oocyte vitrification for fertility preservation following COS does not delay the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer compared to IVM.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether oocyte vitrification following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for fertility preservation (FP) delays the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer (BC) as compared to in vitro maturation (IVM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study including all BC patients eligible for oocyte vitrification following COS or in vitro maturation (IVM) before initiation of NAC between January 2016 and December 2020. The inclusion criteria were female patients aged between 18 and 40, with confirmed non metastatic BC, with indication of NAC, who have had oocyte retrieval for FP after COS, or IVM + / - cryopreservation of ovarian tissue (OTC). Various time points related to cancer diagnosis, FP, or chemotherapy were obtained from a medical record review. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients with confirmed BC who had oocyte retrieval following COS (n = 57) or IVM + / - OTC (n = 140) for FP prior to NAC were included. Overall, the average time from cancer diagnosis to chemotherapy start was similar between patients having undergone COS or IVM before oocyte vitrification (37.3 ± 13.8 vs. 36. 8 ± 13.5 days; p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The indication of NAC for BC should not be considered as an impediment to urgent COS for oocyte vitrification for FP.

Response to Ovarian Stimulation for Urgent Fertility Preservation before Gonadotoxic Treatment in BRCA-Pathogenic-Variant-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

BRCA 1/2 pathogenic variants increase the risk of developing early and aggressive breast cancers (BC). For these patients, fertility potential can be directly affected by oncologic treatments. In addition, evidence indicates that BRCA-mutated women had a significant reduction in their ovarian reserve. In order to improve their chances of conception after the completion of cancer treatments, fertility preservation should be proposed before the administration of gonadotoxic drugs, ideally by oocyte vitrification after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). The present investigation aims to assess the ovarian response to COH in BRCA 1/2-pathogenic-variant carriers diagnosed with BC. Patient characteristics and COH outcomes were compared between BRCA-positive (n = 54) and BRCA-negative (n = 254) patients. The number of oocytes recovered did not differ between the two groups. However, the oocyte maturation rate and the number of mature oocytes obtained (7 (4.5-11.5) vs. 9 (5-14) oocytes, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in the BRCA-mutated patients. Although individualized COH protocols should be discussed, BRCA-mutated patients would benefit from FP before BC occurs, in order to cope with the potential accelerated decline of their ovarian reserve, optimize the success rate of FP by repeating COH cycles, and to preserve the feasibility of PGT-M by collecting a large amount of eggs.

Disease-free survival does not differ according to fertility preservation technique for young women with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether fertility preservation strategies using ovarian stimulation or without using it impact long-term disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective bicentric cohort study. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENT(S): In this study, 740 women with breast cancer, aged 18-43 years, who received primary fertility preservation between 2013 and 2019 after a diagnosis of localized breast cancer were included. INTERVENTION(S): Overall, 328 patients underwent at least 1 ovarian stimulation cycle (STIM group) and 412 had a technique without hormonal administration (no STIM group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Disease-free survival and overall survival up to May 2021 were compared between the 2 groups by log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used for multivariable analyses. RESULT(S): Out of the 740 women who underwent fertility preservation, follow-up data were available for 269 women in the STIM group (82%) and 330 (80%) in the no STIM group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival at 4 years were 87.9% (82.8%-92.2%) and 83.1% (78.4%-87.3%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. After adjustment on prognostic parameters, no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rate was observed between the STIM and no STIM groups (hazard ratios, 0.83 [0.64-1.08]). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 4 years was 97.6% (95.3%-99.2%) and 93.6% (90.9%-95.9%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. Overall survival was higher in the STIM group than no STIM group (log-rank test). After adjustment on prognostic parameters, the risk of death remained significantly lower in the STIM group (Hazard Ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.85]). CONCLUSION(S): In our cohort, STIM for fertility preservation in breast cancer did not significantly impact disease-free survival but was associated with higher overall survival. The disease-free survival and overall survival of young patients with breast cancer were not impacted by fertility preservation techniques irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and the use of ovarian stimulation. Nevertheless, because death and recurrence were rare events, these results should be taken with caution.

Influence of breast cancer prognostic factors on oocyte in vitro maturation outcomes performed for urgent fertility preservation.

STUDY QUESTION: Do breast cancer (BC) characteristics influence IVM of oocytes outcomes in patients undergoing fertility preservation (FP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) III grade, triple-negative BC and HER2 overexpression are independent predictors of fewer oocytes or poor IVM outcomes in young women seeking FP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: SBR grade, triple-negative status and overexpression of HER2, as well as a high Ki67 proliferation index are all established prognostic factors for BC, influencing patients' therapeutic management. Yet there are also concerns about the potential impact of cancer status on ovarian reserve and function. Previous studies analysing the results of ovarian stimulation in BC patients have shown conflicting findings. Nevertheless, there is no data on the potential impact of BC status and prognostic factors on IVM outcome in women undergoing urgent FP. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We studied 321 BC patients, 18 to 41 years of age, who were also candidates for oocyte cryopreservation following IVM. The number of oocytes recovered, maturation rate and total number of cryopreserved oocytes were assessed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Ovarian reserve markers (antral follicle count [AFC] and serum anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] levels) and IVM outcomes were compared according to BC characteristics (Ki67 proliferation index >20%, progesterone and/or oestrogen receptors expression, HER2 status and SBR grade). Logistic regression analysis was then performed to determine the variables that could be independently associated with poor IVM outcomes, such as oocyte retrieval rate <50%, oocyte maturation rate <60% and total number of frozen oocytes <5. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Overall, the mean age of the population was 32.3 ± 4.1 years. Mean AFC and serum AMH levels were 22.8 ± 13.9 follicles and 3.8 ± 3.1 ng/ml, respectively. AMH levels were significantly lower in case of triple-negative BC when compared with ER/PR/HER2 status positive cancer (3.1 ± 2.6 ng/ml vs 4.0 ± 3.3 ng/ml, P = 0.02). The mean number of recovered oocytes was 10.2 ± 9.1. After a mean maturation rate of 58.0 ± 26.1%, 5.8 ± 5.3 mature oocytes were cryopreserved per cycle. The number of retrieved and cryopreserved oocytes after IVM were significantly lower in patients presenting with an SBR III tumour when compared with an SBR I or II tumour (9.6 ± 8.7 vs 11.7 ± 9.8, P = 0.02 and 5.4 ± 5.4 vs 6.6 ± 5.8, P = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate statistical analysis showed that HER2 positive status was associated with a mean maturation rate <60% (odds ratio: 0.54; 95% CI (0.30-0.97)). Ki67 and hormonal status were not correlated with poor IVM outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A weakness is the retrospective nature of the study. Moreover, as with many studies focusing on FP in oncology patients, the lack of data after reutilization of IVM oocytes prevents drawing reliable conclusions on the fate of these frozen gametes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: BC prognostic factors might influence IVM outcomes. Moreover, HER2 is likely to be involved in the ovarian function and oocyte maturation process. Further investigations are needed to better understand the mechanisms at play and their possible impact on the competence of IVM oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was used and there are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of frozen oocytes or embryos cryopreserved after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in vitro maturation (IVM) for female cancer patients who underwent a fertility preservation (FP) prior to gonadotoxic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2009 to December 2017 was conducted. Among the 667 female cancer patients who underwent oocytes or embryos cryopreservation for FP, 40 (6%) have returned to the fertility clinic between 2011 and 2019 to use their frozen material after being cured. We compared these thaw cycles outcomes according to the techniques used at the time of cryopreservation. RESULTS: Among the 40 women cancer survivors who used their cryopreserved material, thirty patients have benefited from at least one embryo transfer. Ten patients did not have an embryo transfer since the oocytes did not survive after the thawing process or because no embryo was obtained after fertilization. We related three live births following FP using IVM (two from frozen oocytes and one after embryo cryopreservation). Five live births were obtained when COS was performed at the time of FP (one from frozen oocytes and four after embryo cryopreservation). CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results, although they are obtained in a small sample, are encouraging and show that different FP techniques can be used in female cancer patients and lead to live births. IVM is one of the options available that does not delay the start of chemotherapy or if ovarian stimulation using gonadotropins is contraindicated.

First follow-up of art pregnancies in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to follow up the monitoring, health and anxiety from women who became pregnant after an embryo transfer or a intrauterine insemination during the COVID-19 epidemic in France STUDY DESIGN: This is a single centre, retrospective study from December 2019 to March 2020 based on a phone call interview using a specific questionnaire sheet specially developed for this study. Questionnaires from 104 pregnant women were completed and descriptive data are then analyzed. RESULTS: Women with ongoing pregnancies (n = 88) did not change their physician visits. The COVID-19 outbreak has created no or few additional stresses for 77 % of pregnant women since the lockdown started. We report a miscarriage rate of 14.4 % (n = 15) and documented 10 patients (11.3 %) who had symptoms related to COVID-19. No severe symptoms and no hospitalization in intensive care unit were identified. CONCLUSION: The epidemic context did not disrupt the medical monitoring of pregnancies and we did not recover an increased rate of miscarriage after ART. None of the patients who had COVID-related symptoms presented with severe clinical manifestations. Surprisingly, pregnant women were psychologically able to experience the lockdown.

Priming Before In Vitro Maturation Cycles in Cancer Patients Undergoing Urgent Fertility Preservation: a Randomized Controlled Study.

In vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes retrieved at germinal vesicle stage, followed by vitrification of mature oocytes, has emerged as a fertility preservation (FP) option. This technique was first developed for patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. In this population, providing LH activity prior to oocyte collection has been associated with better IVM outcomes. However, the benefit of this treatment in normo-ovulatory breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing IVM for FP purpose has never been investigated. To assess if the absence of therapeutic intervention prior to oocyte retrieval for IVM modifies IVM outcomes in BC patients undergoing urgent FP, we performed a non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. The main outcome was the total number of mature oocytes obtained and cryopreserved after IVM. A total of 172 normo-ovulatory women, suffering from BC, 18 to 39 years of age received no injection or a subcutaneous injection of hCG or GnRH agonist (GnRHa) 36 h before oocytes retrieval according to randomized allocation. The total number of cryopreserved oocytes were 5.1 ± 3.8, 5.4 ± 3.8, and 6.0 ± 4.2 oocytes, respectively in the without, hCG and GnRHa groups. Mean differences were not significant between the three groups (- 0.5; CI 97.5% [- 2.03:1.02] and - 0.22; CI 97.5% [- 1.75:1.32], respectively). Intention to treat analyses failed to show non-inferiority in the "without injection group" in comparison with hCG or GnRHa groups. Our results are not conclusive enough to modify our practices and to stop administering hCG or GnRHa before IVM cycles for FP. The study was retrospectively registered to clinical trial (ID NCT03954197) in May 2019.

Does a web-based decision aid improve informed choice for fertility preservation in women with breast cancer (DECISIF)? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy may cause infertility in young survivors of breast cancer. Various fertility preservation techniques increase the likelihood of survivors becoming genetic mothers. Disclosure of cancer diagnosis may impact decision making about fertility preservation. This protocol will develop and test the effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for helping women with breast cancer to make well-informed choices about fertility preservation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be conducted in three phases using mixed methods. In phase I, the aim is to develop a web-based patient decision aid (PDA) in French with a steering committee and using a focus group of five women already treated for breast cancer. In phase II, the face validity of the decision aid will be assessed using questionnaires. In phase III, the PDA will be assessed by a two-arm randomised controlled trial. This will involve a quantitative evaluation of the PDA in clinical practice comparing the quality of the decision-making process between usual care and the PDA. The primary outcome will be informed choice and its components. The secondary outcomes will be decisional conflict and anxiety. Data will be collected during and after an oncofertility consultation. Phase III is underway. Since September 2018, 52 participants have been enrolled in the study and have completed the survey. We expect to have results by February 2020 for a total of 186 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by the Ouest V Research Ethics Board. Results will be spread through peer-reviewed publications, and reported at suitable meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The ClinicalTrials.gov registry .(NCT03591848).

The past, present and future of fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Fertility preservation strategies have been developed for men and women whose fertility is compromised for medical reasons, especially in case of cancer therapy. At present, many reliable options for preserving fertility are available. However, a part of these fertility preservation methods, despite being promising, are still considered experimental. Nevertheless, there are still situations where no methods can be offered. Remarkable scientific progress is currently underway to improve available techniques and to develop new technologies to solve problems with current fertility strategies. These new options may drastically change reproductive options for young patients facing germ cell loss and hence sterility. Therefore, oncofertility counseling by a specialist is recommended for all young cancer patients having to undergo treatment that may reduce fertility potential.

Y-craniosynostosis by premature fusion of the metopic and coronal sutures: a new nosological entity or a variety of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome?

BACKGROUND: New forms and varieties of craniosynostoses are continuously identified due to the current increased interest of clinicians and genetists especially since the introduction of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (Array-CGH) techniques in the diagnostic setting of patients with craniofacial anomalies. METHODS: In this report, we describe the case of an infant who associated the early fusion of the metopic and both the coronal sutures. The interaction of the early fusion of the anterior group of the main cranial sutures gave the infant a particular clinical phenotypes with a Y configuration of the frontal bone and a globally reduced size of the skull. Such a deformity was observed in utero and was subsequently confirmed by the postnatal imaging of the head. RESULTS: This phenotype was never described previously in antenatal period to our knowledge. The array-CGH showed a heterozygous 9.0 Mb deletion in the chromosomal region 7p21.1p21.3 encompassing approximately 25 other genes, spanning from THSD7A to TWIST1/FERD3L. CONCLUSION: This case further illustrates the variability of the clinical spectrum of craniofacial disorders associated with TWIST1 abnormalities. It is important to note that the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome caused by microdeletion is generally characterized by a mental disability. However, of interest, the postoperative psychomotor development of the child considered hereby was within the normal limits.