Analysis of 80 dual-kidney transplantations: a multicenter experience.

INTRODUCTION: The use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is an attractive strategy to enlarge the pool of organs available for transplantation. Considering the fact that ECD organs have a reduced nephron mass, they are preferentially allocated for dual-kidney transplantation (DKT). Authors have reported excellent results of DKT when pretransplant ECD organs are evaluated for histological scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate DKT donor and recipient characteristics for comparison with DKT posttransplant outcomes versus those of recipients of single-kidney transplantations from expanded criteria (edSKT) and ideal donors (idSKT). We analyzed the potential prognostic factors involved in DKT among a population derived from three transplant centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, DKT (n = 80) were performed based upon the ECD kidney allocation assessed by biopsy. RESULTS: The average donor ages for the DKT, edSKT, and idSKT groups were 68.8 ± 7.8, 65.3 ± 7.2, and 40.1 ± 13.8 years, respectively (P < .001). The number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches was greater in the DKT group (3.1 ± 1.2, P < .05). Patient and graft 5-year survival rates were similar among DKT, edSKT, and idSKT recipients, namely, 97.5% versus 95.8% versus 96.9% and 93.7% versus 87.4% versus 86.9%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine values at discharge were lower in the DKT and idSKT recipients (1.5 ± 0.9 and 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dL; P < .05) compared with the edSKT group (1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Correlations between supposed prognostic factors and survival among the DKT group noted worse outcomes in reoperation cases (P < .05). CONCLUSION: We confirmed that DKT produced successful outcomes. An accurate surgical procedure is particularly important to try to avoid reoperations. In our experience, the use of a biopsy as an absolute criterion to allocate ECD kidneys may be too protective.

[Renal transplantation from living donor in Italy and Europe]. / Il trapianto da vivente in Italia e in Europa.

Renal transplantation from a living donor shows a better graft and patient survival when compared with cadaver donor grafts. Moreover, since surgery can be planned in advance when a living donor is available, the time spent on dialysis while awaiting transplantation can be greatly reduced and dialysis treatment can be completely avoided in some cases. Only few risks for the donor have been reported as a consequence of nephrectomy, both in the short and long term. Nevertheless, despite these advantages, the number of living donor renal transplants carried out in Europe each year varies greatly from country to country and is particularly low in Spain and Italy. Several factors account for these differences, mainly the effectiveness of the organ procurement system, which could make people reluctant to living donation, and doctors' and patients' limited knowledge about living donor transplants. Nephrologists have the responsibility to identify patients eligible for transplant early in the course of the disease, and to inform them and their relatives about living donor transplantation, enabling them to make informed choices among the various treatment options in end-stage renal disease.

Contrast-enhanced sonography in early kidney graft dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was a comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) and power Doppler ultrasound (US) findings in renal grafts within 30 days posttransplantation. METHODS: A total of 39 kidney recipients underwent CEUS (SonoVue bolus injection) and US examinations at 5 (T0), 15 (T1), and 30 (T2) days after grafting. The results were correlated with clinical findings and functional evolution. Fourteen patients displayed early acute kidney dysfunction: 10 had acute tubular necrosis (acute tubular necrosis [ATN] group); four acute rejection episodes (ARE group); 25 with normal evolution (as control, C group). Renal biopsies were performed to obtain a diagnosis in the four ATN cases and in all ARE patients. Creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate were used as kidney function parameters. CEUS analysis was performed both on cortical and medullary regions while US resistivity indexes (RI) were obtained on main, infrarenal, and arcuate arteries. From an analysis of CEUS time-intensity curves, we computed peak enhancement (PEAK), time to peak (TTP), mean transit time (MTT), regional blood flow (RBF) and volume (RBV), and cortical to medullary ratio of these indies (RATIO). RESULTS: An increased RI was present in the ATN and ARE groups as well as a reduced PEAK and RBF. RATIO-RBV and RATIO-MTT were lower than C among ATN cases, while TTP was higher compared to C in ARE. No statistical difference was evidence for RI between ATN and ARE groups. MTT (T0) was significantly related to creatinine at follow-up (T2). CONCLUSIONS: US and CEUS identified grafts with early dysfunction, but only some CEUS-derived parameters distinguished ATN from ARE, adding prognostic information.

Multicenter study on double kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Marginal organs not suitable for single kidney transplantation are considered for double kidney transplantation (DKT). Herein we have reviewed short and long-term outcomes of DKT over a 7-year experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, 80 DKT were performed in the transplant centers of Bologna, Parma, and Modena, Italy. Recipient mean age was 61+/-5 years. The main indications were glomerular nephropathy (n=33) and hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n=14). Mean HLA A, B, and DR mismatches were 3.1+/-1.2. Donor mean age was 69+/-8 years and mean creatinine clearance was 75+/-27 mL/min. Almost all kidneys were perfused with Celsior solution. Mean cold ischemia time was 17+/-4 hours and mean warm ischemia time was 41+/-17 minutes. Mean biopsy score was 4.4. Immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus (n=52) or cyclosporine (n=26). RESULTS: Fifty (62.5%) patients displayed good postoperative renal function. Thirty (37.5%) experienced acute tubular necrosis and required postoperative dialysis treatment; 8 acute rejections occurred. Urinary complications were 13.7% with 8/11 requiring surgical revision. There were 6 surgical reexplorations: intestinal perforation (n=2), bleeding (n=3), and lymphocele (n=1). Two patients lost both grafts due to vascular and infectious complications at 7 or 58 days after transplantation. Two patients underwent intraoperative transplantectomy due to massive vascular thrombosis. Four (5%) patients underwent transplantectomy of a single graft due to vascular complications (n=2), bleeding (n=1), or infectious complications (n=1). Graft and patient survivals were 95% and 100% versus 93% and 97% at 3 versus 36 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DKT is a safe approach for organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or accepted.

Acute diverticulitis with colon perforation in renal transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Acute diverticulitis with colon perforation is a serious condition in transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to analyze our experience with colon perforations among 875 renal transplant recipients between January 1986 and September 2004. METHODS: Patients were analyzed by age, gender, steroid dosage, time interval from the transplantation, delay between symptoms and surgery, clinical presentation, surgical procedure, graft and patient outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 8 patients with colon perforation. The incidence of perforation was 0.9%. Mean age at the the time of perforation was 58.5 years. Fever, abdominal pain, localized or diffuse signs of peritonitis, and leukocytosis were present in 7 patients (87.5%). Three patients (37.5%) were on steroid-free immunosuppression, whereas in 2 cases (25%) the steroid dosage was >20 mg/d. The mean interval between transplantation and perforation was 4.1 years. Two episodes (25%) occurred within 1 month following transplantation and the other 6 (75%) between 1 and 15 years. The interval between the onset of symptoms and surgery was longer than 48 hours in 1 patient (12.5%). In 5 cases (62.5%), a Hartmann procedure was performed; in 2 patients (25%), a resection with primary anastomosis was preferred. The last patient had a direct suture of the colon. Mortality rate was 12.5%. At a median follow-up of 6.1 years, 6 patients (75%) are alive with 5 functioning grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Colon perforations in renal transplant recipients remain a challenging surgical problem. An aggressive diagnostic attitude and an immediate surgical treatment may contribute to significantly decrease the incidence and the mortality of this complication.

Percutaneous renal artery embolization of nonfunctioning allograft: preliminary experience.

Percutaneous renal artery embolization has been introduced as an alternative to nephrectomy for patients with a nonfunctioning allograft and Graft Intolerance Syndrome. The symptoms resulting from this syndrome include fever, local pain, hypertension, and hematuria. From April 2003 to October 2003, 5 patients were treated with this technique. The intraparenchymal renal arteries were embolized by injection of calibrated tris-acryl gelatin microspheres of increasing size (from 100-330 to 700-900 microm) and completed with the insertion of 5-mm-8-mm steel coils in the renal artery. The procedure was well tolerated in all cases; no major complications occurred. In 3 patients, the symptoms disappeared immediately. In 1 patient, it was necessary to perform a second embolization due to collateral circulation developing from a lumbar artery; this further procedure resolved the symptoms. In the last case, the patient underwent nephrectomy because of septic fever. In conclusion, patients with this syndrome refractory to medical treatment may be treated by the effective and minimally invasive procedures of percutaneous allograft artery embolization with no significant short-term or late complications.

Embolization of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm with massive hemorrhage following pancreas transplantation: a case report.

Pseudoaneurysm associated with an arterioenteric fistula is rare, but its clinical manifestations may represent a dramatic event that involves diagnostic and therapeutic problems. We report a case of an arterioduodenal fistula related to a ruptured pseudoaneurysm after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) with massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage treated by embolization of the Y graft. A 51-year-old man with type I diabetes and end-stage renal disease underwent SPK. No rejection episodes were documented; the patient was discharged with normal pancreatic and renal function. Two months later the patient was readmitted for an episode of massive lower digestive bleeding and hypotension. The Y-graft was embolized in order to obtain a prompt arrest of the bleeding. The procedure was successful and the patient progressively recovered. Once the hypovolemia was completely corrected, the graft was removed. An arterioenteric fistula between donor mesenteric artery and duodenum was confirmed. Few reports exist in the literature regarding the development of a pseudoaneurysm after pancreas transplantation. To our best knowledge only one case of pseudoaneurysm rupture into donor duodenum has been recently published. In our case angiography recognized the site of the pseudoaneurysm and its rupture into donor duodenum. Embolization of the Y-graft appeared the most rapid, simple, and safe approach to obtain the prompt arrest of the massive bleeding. Embolization of the Y-graft may represent a valid option in the presence of life-threatening hemorrhage.

Renal vein extension in right kidney transplantation.

A short right renal vein may be associated with technical problems in renal transplantation. For this reason, a vena caval extension may be useful to improve exposure of the anastomosis and graft placement. This report evaluates the safety and the effectiveness of renal vein extension, which was routinely performed in right renal transplantation. From April 1986 to December 2002, we performed 371 right kidney transplantations with 252 using the standard technique (group A) and 119 using the renal vein extension (group B). No statistical differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of renal vein thrombosis incidence, delayed graft function, morbidity, and graft loss. Indeed, mean warm ischemia time was reduced in the venoplasty group. In conclusion, renal vein extension is an easy, safe technique that reduces warm ischemia time. We suggest more extensive use of this procedure in right kidney transplantation.