Smoking compromises cause-specific survival in patients with operable colorectal cancer.

AIMS: To assess whether active smoking compromises survival in patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied a regionally based cohort of 284 consecutive patients referred to the Tayside Cancer Centre for consideration of adjuvant treatment after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Cause-specific survival was significantly worse (P = 0.0015) in patients who were actively smoking at the time of their first post-operative visit. The absolute difference in 5-year cause-specific survival (active smokers vs the rest) was 21%. In adjusted multi-variate analysis of patients after pathologically complete (R0) resection, the hazard ratio was 2.55 (95% confidence interval 1.40-4.64) in active smokers compared with non-smokers. T stage, number of positive nodes and co-morbidity score were also of independent prognostic influence. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent smoking was, in this small series, an important and independent predictor of cancer-related death after surgery for cancer of the large bowel. Because smoking and deprivation are related, some of the adverse effects of deprivation upon survival in this group of patients may be explained by smoking behaviour.

Deprivation, comorbidity and survival in a cohort of patients with colorectal cancer.

We studied a regionally based cohort of 483 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer referred for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. These patients were assessed and managed according to consistent policies. We investigated the effects of socio-economic deprivation and comorbidity upon survival. Significant comorbidity was present in 48% of the patients. Overall survival and cause-specific survival were summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves. Equality of survivor functions was assessed using the logrank procedure and Cox's proportional hazards analysis. In univariate analysis, the following variables significantly affected survival: comorbidity, performance status, age and clinical stage. We could find no correlation between deprivation and comorbidity. The presence of comorbidity significantly affected cause-specific survival (3-year cause-specific survival without comorbidity 54.2%; with comorbidity 44.6%). In adjusted analysis, deprivation had an independently adverse effect on overall survival, hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.08), but this was only of borderline statistical significance, P = 0.049. This study demonstrates that the interrelationships between comorbidity, deprivation and outcome in this group of patients are complex: even when care is readily available, patient assessments are uniform, and clinical decision making is consistent.