Intraoperative electromyography for identification of the trapezius muscle innervation: clinical proof of a new anatomical concept.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: There is still considerable controversy among surgeons on trapezius muscle innervation. In addition, the rate of unexpected postoperative trapezius pareses is unacceptably high. Recent anatomical findings might answer most of the questions. The objective of the present study was to clinically prove the recent anatomical findings, especially the concept of the innervation of the descending part of the trapezius muscle. STUDY DESIGN: Intraoperative electromyography of the spinal accessory nerve and its branches in the posterior triangle of the neck. SETTING: Intraoperative electromyography was performed during 17 modified radical neck dissections on 14 patients of both sexes ranging in age from 44 to 68 years (mean age, 56 y). Potentials were registered through pairs of needle electrodes placed in each of the three parts of the trapezius muscle. Intraoperatively, the spinal accessory nerve and its fine cranial branch passing toward the descending part of the muscle were identified and stimulated in the posterior triangle of the neck.RESULTS Stimulation of the fine cranial branch of the spinal accessory nerve led to a clearly visible and recordable contraction in the descending part of the trapezius muscle in all patients. Stimulation of the main trunk of the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck distal to the above-mentioned branching led to a clearly visible and recordable contraction in the transverse and ascending parts of the muscle. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly support recent anatomical findings showing that, functionally, the most important descending part of the trapezius muscle is innervated by a fine single branch arising from the spinal accessory nerve in the posterior triangle of the neck. This may help to prevent more patients undergoing modified radical neck dissections from shoulder-arm syndrome.

[Diagnosis of glomus jugulare tumor recurrence with dynamic contrast medium flow in MRI]. / Rezidivdiagnostik von Glomus jugulare-Tumoren mittels dynamischer Kontrastmittel-Anflutung in der MRT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of dynamic MRI to differentiate residual tumor from scar after glomus jugulare (GJ) surgery. METHODS: 26 patients after GJ surgery were examined with dynamic contrast medium MRI on a 1.5 T Philips-Gyro-Scan NT. A T1-weighted TFE sequence was performed to localise the 5 slices for the dynamic study. Subsequently, a T1-weighted TFE sequence was used for the dynamic contrast medium study. We started contrast medium administration and TFE sequence at the same time. The time until acquisition of the first image was 7.4 s, and the interval between two images 7 s (total time 2.24 min). Intensity versus time studies were performed in the region of interest. RESULTS: 2 typical intensity versus time graphs were observed: residual tumors showed a rapid increase in signal intensity, followed by a "wash-out" phase, and a plateau phase in the later course. Scar showed a moderate increase in signal intensity, followed by a plateau phase on a low intensity level. In 9 patients, in whom tumor removal was subtotal, we saw the typical graph of a GJ tumor. 4 of 17 patients with complete tumor removal showed a typical graph like that of residual tumor, 13 of 17 patients showed the typical graph of a scar. CONCLUSION: With dynamic contrast medium MRI studies, differentiation between residual tumor and scar is possible in patients with prior GJ surgery.