RESUMO
Gas cameras are primarily used to detect gas leaks, but their use has been increasingly extended to mass flow quantification (qOGI). We employ the previously published active illuminated gas camera [Bergau et al. "Real-time active-gas imaging of small gas leaks," J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 12, 61-68 (2023) and Bergau et al. "Flow rate quantification of small methane leaks using laser spectroscopy and deep learning," Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 182, 752-759 (2024)] in a real-world application for quantification, enhancing the camera with two new features: sensitivity adaptation and camera-gas distance detection. This technology was applied to a gas leak found in the pressure swing adsorption room of a biogas plant in Germany. We compare its performance with state-of-the-art quantification gas cameras (qOGI), such as Sensia Mileva 33. Such a comparison between active and passive gas cameras is possible for the first time due to the introduced sensitivity tuning. Additionally, we enclosed the gas leak and measure the methane concentration with a flame ionization detector, providing a gold standard for comparison. Our findings revealed relative offsets to our gold standard of -57% and +319% for the DAS-camera and the Sensia, respectively, suggesting that the accuracy of mass flow quantification could be improved through the use of active gas cameras.
