Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24199680

RESUMO

There is controversy on the preferred mode of delivery (vaginal delivery (VD) versus caesarean section (CS)) in preterm breech delivery in relation to neonatal outcome. While CS is supposed to be safer for the fetus, arguments against CS can be the increased risk of maternal morbidity, risks for future pregnancies, and costs. Moreover, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome occurs more frequently after CS compared to VD. In the past, several RCTs have been started on this subject, but they were all preliminary and stopped due to recruitment difficulties. As the Cochrane review of these RCT's reported on 116 women only, knowledge on the effectiveness of CS and VD can at present only be obtained from non-randomized studies. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies that assessed the association between mode of delivery and neonatal mortality in women with preterm breech presentation. We searched Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane library for articles comparing neonatal mortality after VD versus CS in preterm breech presentation (gestational age 25(+0) till 36(+6) weeks). Seven studies, involving a total of 3557 women, met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The weighted risk of neonatal mortality was 3.8% in the CS group and 11.5% in the VD group (pooled RR 0.63 (95% CI 0.48-0.81)). We conclude that cohort studies indicate that CS reduces neonatal mortality as compared to VD.


Assuntos
Apresentação Pélvica/terapia , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Nascimento Prematuro , Cesárea/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Mortalidade Infantil , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 147(48): 2382-5, 2003 Nov 29.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14677481

RESUMO

Extensive abdominal infections with Actinomyces were diagnosed in two women aged 35 and 33 years respectively, who suffered from the nonspecific symptoms fever and abdominal pain. These infections occur more often in women with an intrauterine device. Development of an abdominal mass with ureter or bowel obstruction may cause hydronephrosis and mechanical ileus. The patients underwent a laparotomy and a double-J catheter was inserted, which could be removed later on (temporary stoma). Treatment included high-dose penicillin i.v. followed by oral amoxicillin. Both patients recovered. It may be difficult to establish this diagnosis: the first patient was diagnosed by histopathological examination, in the second Actinomyces had been found in a routine cervical smear a few years earlier.


Assuntos
Actinomicose/diagnóstico , Actinomicose/cirurgia , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Dor Abdominal/microbiologia , Actinomyces/isolamento & purificação , Actinomicose/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Esfregaço Vaginal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...