Levothyroxine or minimally invasive therapies for benign thyroid nodules.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodules (TN) are common in the adult population. Some physicians use suppressive levothyroxine (LT4) therapy to achieve a reduction in the number and volume of TN. In addition, minimally invasive treatments, such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) sclerotherapy, laser photocoagulation (LP), and microwave (MW), radiofrequency (RF) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation, have been proposed, especially for pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints, as an alternative to surgery. However, the risk to benefit ratio of all treatments for benign TN is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of LT4 or minimally invasive therapies (PEI, LP, and RF/HIFU/MW ablation) on benign TN. SEARCH METHODS: We identified studies from computerised searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS (all performed up to April 2014). We also searched trial registers, examined reference lists of included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews, and contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies if they were RCTs of LT4, PEI, LP, RF, HIFU or MW therapy in participants with an established diagnosis of benign TN. We excluded trials investigating the prevention of recurrence of thyroid disease after surgery, irradiation or treatment with radioiodine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed studies for risk of bias and evaluated overall study quality utilising the GRADE instrument. We assessed the statistical heterogeneity of included studies by visually inspecting forest plots and quantifying the diversity using the I² statistic. We synthesised data using random-effects model meta-analysis or descriptive analysis, as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-one studies randomised 2952 outpatients to investigate the effects of different therapies on benign TN. Studies on LT4, PEI, LP and RF ablation therapy randomised 2083, 607, 192 and 70 participants, respectively. We found no RCTs of HIFU or MW ablation therapy in benign TN. The duration of treatment varied according to the applied therapies: up to five years for LT4 and one to three PEI ablations, one to three LP sessions and one or two RF sessions. Median follow-up was 12 months for LT4 and six months for minimally invasive therapies. Evidence was of low-to-moderate quality, and risk of performance and detection bias for subjective outcomes was high in most trials.No study evaluated all-cause mortality or health-related quality of life. Only one LT4 study provided some data on the development of thyroid cancer, reporting no abnormal cytological findings. One LP study provided limited information on costs of treatment.LT4 compared with no treatment or placebo was associated with a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in 16% compared with 10% of participants after 6 to 24 months of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 2.38); P = 0.03; 958 participants; 10 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Pressure symptoms or cosmetic complaints were not investigated in LT4 studies. LT4 therapy was generally well tolerated: three studies provided quantitative data on signs and symptoms of hyperthyroidism, which were observed in 25% of LT4-treated versus 7% of placebo-treated participants at 12 to 18 months of follow-up (269 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence).PEI compared with cyst aspiration only was associated with a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in 83% compared with 44% of participants after 1 to 24 months of follow-up (RR 1.83 (95% CI 1.32 to 2.54); P = 0.0003; 105 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence). Improvements in neck compression symptoms after 6 to 12 months of follow-up were seen in 78% of participants receiving PEI versus 38% of those in comparator groups. No reliable summary effect estimate could be established, RR ranged from 1.0 to 3.06 in favour of PEI (370 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). In all trials, participants experienced periprocedural cervical tenderness and light-to-moderate pain usually lasting from minutes to several hours. As a result of the PEI procedure, 26% of participants reported slight-to-moderate pain compared with 12% of those receiving cyst aspiration only (RR 1.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 5.12); P = 0.28; 104 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence).One study comparing LP with LT4 showed a nodule volume reduction of 50% or more in favour of LP after 12 months of follow-up in 33% of LP participants versus 0% of LT4 participants, respectively (62 participants; 1 trial; low-quality evidence). A total of 82% of LP-treated versus 0% of untreated participants showed improvements in pressure symptoms after 6 to 12 months of follow-up (RR 26.65 (95% CI 5.47 to 129.72); P < 0.0001; 92 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence). Around 20% of LP-treated participants reported light-to-moderate cervical pain lasting 48 hours or more (97 participants; 3 trials; low-quality evidence).One trial with 40 participants, comparing RF with no treatment, resulted in a mean nodule volume reduction of 76% in the RF group compared with 0% of those in the no-treatment group at six months of follow-up (low-quality evidence). These RF-treated participants had fewer pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints after 12 months of follow-up compared with untreated participants (a 2.8 decrease versus a 1.1 increase on a six-point scale, respectively, with higher values indicating more severe symptoms; low-quality evidence). All participants complained of pain and discomfort during RF, which disappeared when the energy was reduced or turned off (low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No study evaluated all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life or provided systematic data on the development of thyroid cancer. Longest follow-up was five years and median follow-up was 12 months. Nodule volume reductions were achieved by PEI, LP and RF, and to a lesser extent, by LT4. However, the clinical relevance of this outcome measure is doubtful. PEI, LP and RF led to improvements in pressure symptoms and cosmetic complaints. Adverse events such as light-to-moderate periprocedural pain were seen after PEI, LP and RF. Future studies should focus on patient-important outcome measures, especially health-related quality of life, and compare minimally invasive procedures with surgery. RCTs with follow-up periods of several years and good-quality observational studies are needed to provide evidence on the development of thyroid cancer, all-cause mortality and long-term adverse events.

Emerging role of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: In type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) there is a progressive loss of beta-cell function. One new approach yielding promising results is the use of the orally active dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. However, every new compound for T2DM has to prove long-term safety especially on cardiovascular outcomes. OBJECTIVES: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of sitagliptin and vildagliptin therapy on main efficacy parameters and safety. SELECTION CRITERIA, DATA COLLECTION, AND ANALYSIS: Randomized controlled clinical studies of at least 12 weeks' duration in T2DM. RESULTS: DPP-4 inhibitors versus placebo showed glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (A1c) improvements of 0.7% versus placebo but not compared to monotherapy with other hypoglycemic agents (0.3% in favor of controls). The overall risk profile of DPP-4 inhibitors was low, however a 34% relative risk increase (95% confidence interval 10% to 64%, P = 0.004) was noted for all-cause infection associated with sitagliptin use. No data on immune function, health-related quality of life and diabetic complications could be extracted. CONCLUSIONS: DPP-4 inhibitors have some theoretical advantages over existing therapies with oral antidiabetic compounds but should currently be restricted to individual patients. Long-term data on cardiovascular outcomes and safety are needed before widespread use of these new agents.

Human versus animal insulin in people with diabetes mellitus. A systematic review.

This review is in accordance with the findings of the systematic review of Airey et al [18] with respect to the absence of a differential effect on hypoglycemia between human and animal insulin. For the first time, however, the review compares the relative efficacies of human and animal insulin, which indicates that human insulin was introduced without proof of being superior to animal insulin. Studies have not assessed patient-centered outcomes [41,42], such as patient satisfaction, health-related quality of life, and diabetes-related morbidity. Randomized trials did not report on qualitative assessments of patients' experiences when using different insulin species. Because history tends to repeat itself, we probably will be faced with other "innovations" (e.g., insulin analogs) evaluated in clinical trials tht focus on surrogate outcomes followed by marketing of insulins "proved" to be effective in short-term, underpowered, and badly executed studies.

Aspirin in diabetic retinopathy. A systematic review.

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for eye disease that can lead to blindness. There have been both concerns that aspirin use might worsen diabetic retinopathy, as well as hopes that aspirin might be beneficial in treating it. We investigated whether there are beneficial effects of aspirin alone and in combination with other antiplatelet agents in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, and the relative hazards for the development of high-risk proliferative retinopathy following aspirin treatment. We conducted a sensitive search for randomized controlled trials combined with index terms for identifying studies on aspirin treatment in diabetic retinopathy in the Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2001) and Medline (1966 to October, 2001). We examined randomized controlled clinical trials in diabetic patients with (non) proliferative diabetic retinopathy and aspirin treatment alone or in combination with dipyramidole versus placebo administration. Two independent reviewers judged trial eligibility, collected details of study population, interventions, and outcomes using a standard data extraction form. One reviewer assessed the quality of trial reporting. We identified six publications pertinent to our objective. Aspirin dosages ranged from 650 mg to 990 mg daily, the dose of dipyridamole, used in only one trial, was 225 mg per day. Studies lasted 8 weeks to 5 years. All trials showed that aspirin alone or in combination with dipyridamole neither lowered nor increased the risk of the development of diabetic retinopathy. The results suggest that there are no ocular contraindications to taking aspirin if required as part of a treatment for cardiovascular diseases or other medical indications.