The relationship between disease activity, quality of life, and personality types in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis patients.

We hypothesized that clinical outcomes might be influenced by personality type (A, B, C, D) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). One hundred ninety-four patients (104 with RA, 90 with AS) participated in a questionnaire study. We evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), personality type A/B with the Jenkins Activity Survey, type C with the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory Anger-in Scale, type D with the Type D Personality Scale, and disease activity with Disease Activity Score with 28 joints for RA and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index for AS. We used Pearson's correlation coefficient, independent samples t tests, and multivariate analyses of variance. In the RA group, type D personality was significantly correlated with 7/12 SF-36 components. AS patients with type D personality had deficits in all SF-36 subscales. Type D was related with higher disease activity in RA and AS. Both RA and AS type C patients had more active disease forms and negatively affected HRQoL subscales. In the RA group, type A personality did not correlate with HRQoL, but it positively influenced pain visual analog scale scores. In AS patients, type A personality was linked with higher HRQoL and with less active disease. Type C and type D personality types were correlated with decreased HRQoL and higher disease activity in RA and AS patients. Type A personality was associated with less active disease and higher HRQoL in AS patients and with less pain in RA patients.

Economic considerations and patients' preferences affect treatment selection for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete choice experiment among European rheumatologists.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the value that rheumatologists across Europe attach to patients' preferences and economic aspects when choosing treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: In a discrete choice experiment, European rheumatologists chose between two hypothetical drug treatments for a patient with moderate disease activity. Treatments differed in five attributes: efficacy (improvement and achieved state on disease activity), safety (probability of serious adverse events), patient's preference (level of agreement), medication costs and cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). A Bayesian efficient design defined 14 choice sets, and a random parameter logit model was used to estimate relative preferences for rheumatologists across countries. Cluster analyses and latent class models were applied to understand preference patterns across countries and among individual rheumatologists. RESULTS: Responses of 559 rheumatologists from 12 European countries were included in the analysis (49% females, mean age 48 years). In all countries, efficacy dominated treatment decisions followed by economic considerations and patients' preferences. Across countries, rheumatologists avoided selecting a treatment that patients disliked. Latent class models revealed four respondent profiles: one traded off all attributes except safety, and the remaining three classes disregarded ICER. Among individual rheumatologists, 57% disregarded ICER and these were more likely from Italy, Romania, Portugal or France, whereas 43% disregarded uncommon/rare side effects and were more likely from Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden or UK. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, European rheumatologists are willing to trade between treatment efficacy, patients' treatment preferences and economic considerations. However, the degree of trade-off differs between countries and among individuals.

Acute pain: a multifaceted challenge - the role of nimesulide.

BACKGROUND: This article summarizes the outcome from an international consensus meeting, which took place in Vienna on 4 November 2014. SCOPE: The aim of the meeting was to provide the state of the art on the pathophysiology and treatment of acute pain with special emphasis on nimesulide, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) indicated for the treatment of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea. Besides the data on the mechanisms of acute inflammatory pain and on the efficacy and safety of nimesulide in patients affected by different forms of acute pain, the clinical experience of attending experts was discussed based on selected case reports. RESULTS: The members of this consensus group recognized that nimesulide is a NSAID highly effective in the treatment of several painful situations with an acute inflammatory component including primary dysmenorrhea. Although safety concerns regarding nimesulide have emerged in recent years, both robust new epidemiological data and clinical experience confirm a positive benefit/risk profile of nimesulide in the treatment of several forms of acute pain. CONCLUSIONS: The members of this international consensus group concluded that nimesulide, when used appropriately, remains a particularly valuable and safe option for the treatment of several conditions characterized by the presence of acute inflammatory pain because of the rapid onset of the analgesic action, and the positive evidence-based benefit/risk profile.

Socio-economical factors that influence the perception of quality of life in patients with osteoporosis.

The appearance of osteoporosis in elders and the growth of the frequency which it is diagnosed with as we approach patients who are older and older, makes this health problem very important in the societies in which a high number of persons reach old age. These societies, usually belonging to economically advanced jurisdictions, are the first interested in the way health expenses can balance the benefits of the quality of life acquired in these groups of population. The evaluation of the quality of life has become a very important process, which still raises methodological problems to the researchers. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent the factors involved in defining the quality of life by the patients modified according to the existence of osteoporosis as a defined but also as a perceived disease, as far as it is considered a serious or less serious affection by each patient. 210 female patients participated in the study. The statistical analysis was done by using SPSS 22.0 (IBM Corp. - U.S.A.). p < 0,05 was used as a limit for the statistical significance. Descriptive and analytical analyses were made by following Pearson correlation index in cases of normal distributions, the comparison between groups was made by using t-Student test, respectively chi square test in the cases which required its use. The current study highlights a direct relationship between the quality of life, as it is perceived by the patients, and the quality of the health status, which is more important than the relationship between the quality of life and the other objectives measured by WHOQOL scale. This study also shows that for the Romanian patient diagnosed with osteoporosis, who is enclosed in the age limits of this study, the health status represents the main driver of monitoring the quality of life.

Evaluation of adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment from the socio-economic context.

Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by the reduction of the bone mass and the modification of the bone architecture, which leads to the risk of fracture of the fragile bones, this being the main clinical consequence of the disease. At the same time, osteoporosis is not only a problem by itself, but it is very important from the point of view of the consequences it may produce. Among its consequences, fractures should be mentioned especially in elders, their presence finally leading to an important decrease in the quality of life or even to death. Osteoporosis affects a high amount of persons, preponderantly elders, being considered a very important problem as the society we are talking about deals with the problem of aging. Socio-economical factors and their impact in the development of different pathologies have been seriously analyzed, especially by the western school of medicine. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the adherence to the treatment for osteoporosis of patients diagnosed with osteoporosis or in whom this diagnosis was taken into consideration by the physician, according to some characteristics identified as being the most relevant by a group of specialists. 210 patients were evaluated in this study during January 2011 and December 2013. This study highlighted the way patients with a real or presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis adhere to the treatment for this disease according to the conditions considered relevant by a team of rheumatologists. It is important to notice that, still from the beginning, once the duration of the disease grows, patients become more and more conscious of the seriousness of the disease and more and more of them adhere to the treatment.

Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis: volar versus dorsal synovitis evaluation and scoring.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a major issue for a proper treatment administration; it has been proven that ultrasound (US) examination could be of valuable help and it is currently being investigated as a possible outcome measure for the disease. It is, though, of greatest importance to accurately establish the place of US scores among the already validated outcome measures, according to Outcome Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Trials (OMERACT) filter. The present study is designed to compare the results of gray-scale ultrasound (GSUS) and Power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) additive scores, separately calculated for volar and dorsal aspects of the hand, with physical examination, patient's evaluation of disease pain and global activity on Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and traditional scores for disease activity assessment (DAS28, CDAI, SDAI, HAQ). The final aim is to prove the advantages of volar US evaluation in RA patients. METHODS: 42 RA patients have been clinically evaluated for pain and swelling of their hand joints, completed VAS and HAQ questionnaires and underwent both volar and dorsal sonography of the hands during the same day. The US examiner was blinded to clinical assessments and lab results. For each patient 20 joints were assessed by sonography (radiocarpal, intercarpal, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) 2-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) 2-5). Carpal joints were only evaluated from dorsal view, while MCPs and PIPs were evaluated both from dorsal and volar aspect resulting a total of 36 distinct evaluations for each patient. GSUS synovial hypertrophy was assessed both by quantitative measurement and semiquantitative scale (0-3 grades); Doppler signal (PDUS) was recorded on a semiquantitative scale (0-3 grades). The semiquantitative grades for both GSUS and PDUS evaluation of each joint were added and the sum was defined as the Echographic Score (ES) of each patient. Separately, we added the semiquantitative grades for volar and dorsal side, resulting in Volar ES (VES) and Dorsal ES (DES) of each patient. RESULTS: We found ESs correlated with other activity scores: DAS28, CDAI, SDAI, HAQ. Correlations with clinical indices as CDAI and SDAI were stronger for VES than for DES. US discovered more synovitis than clinical examination. CONCLUSION: VES is a suitable reflection of RA activity and volar US examination should accompany the dorsal one both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

Vibroarthrography--a possible functional non-invasive method for early detection damaged cartilage joint.

The vibroacoustic signals emitted by the diarthrodial articulation during a normal movement differentiates a healthy case from a pathologic one, due to alteration in forms and contact surfaces. The differences are shown by a various dynamics of the vibroacoustic spectra. Parametric representation of the acquired signals, filtering and clinical interpretation of those allow classification and fast recognition of a normal/pathologic status of the investigated articulation by the physician. Our method of acquiring the sound and vibration signals is effectuated completely non-invasive, with a set of translators using Pulse - sounds and vibrations analyzers (a matrix of prepolarised microphones with measurement domain in infrasound scale and piezoelectric acceleration transducers). A comparative study of vibroacoustic and thermal spectra, with early alterations revealed by knee nuclear magnetic resonance, correlates vibroacoustic and thermic spectra alterations with morphological ones, by determining certain limits between normal and pathological morphofunctional patterns. This prospective comparative study will help us evaluate the method in terms of sensibility, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, indices that assure the diagnostic power to the method.