Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with 80 and 160 mg valsartan in healthy, normotensive subjects.

BACKGROUND: An 80-mg dose once or twice daily is the dose of valsartan frequently administered for treatment of hypertension. The target dose selected for the Val-HeFT trial in patients with chronic heart failure is 160 mg twice daily. The level and time course of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1))-receptor blockade achieved by 160 mg valsartan have not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven normotensive healthy subjects were assigned in random order to receive a single dose of placebo, 80 mg valsartan, and 160 mg valsartan at 7- to 10-day intervals. AT(1)-receptor blockade level (%) was determined by the pressure response to administration of exogenous angiotensin II. The pressure response to angiotensin II was measured at baseline and 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after oral administration of placebo, 80 mg valsartan, and 160 mg valsartan. Eighty and 160 mg valsartan resulted in a significant and similar level of AT(1)-receptor blockade at 2 and 6 hours compared with placebo. The 160-mg dose resulted in a significantly greater level of AT(1)-receptor blockade than 80 mg at 12 and 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 6 hours after oral administration of 80 and 160 mg valsartan the level of AT(1)-receptor blockade is similar. However, only 160 mg valsartan provides sustained AT(1)-receptor blockade over 24 hours.

Dose-dependent blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor with losartan in normal volunteers.

Losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist, was developed as a more specific alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. At a daily dose of 50 mg, losartan is currently evaluated in large outcome trials involving patients with hypertension and postmyocardial infarction. The current study evaluated the level and duration of blockade of a pressor response to angiotensin II by 50 and 150 mg of losartan, compared with 32 mg of candesartan. Eight normotensive volunteers were randomly assigned to a single dose of losartan 50 or 150 mg, candesartan 32 mg, or placebo. Subjects were re-randomized after a 2-week washout period to complete all four study arms. Radial artery systolic pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II was measured at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after administration of drug. Losartan 50 mg reduced the pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II significantly only at 6 h. In contrast, candesartan and losartan 150 mg produced a greater reduction in the pressure response to angiotensin II throughout the 24-h period. This suppression was not paralleled by a reduction in resting systemic arterial pressure. Higher doses than 50 mg of losartan might be evaluated to elicit optimal clinical effects.

Therapeutic implications of escape from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic heart failure.

The level of inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) provided by standard doses of ACE inhibitors may only be partial during long-term treatment in patients with severe chronic heart failure (CHF). Partial ACE inhibition with time is often referred to as escape from ACE inhibition and labeled ACE escape. Several lines of evidence suggest that ACE escape occurs in patients with severe CHF. Plasma levels of angiotensin II rise above initial values during long-term ACE inhibition, and the effects of ACE inhibitors on cardiac remodeling and lowering of sympathetic nervous system activity attenuate after 1 year of treatment. Moreover, angiotensin II type I receptor blockade (ARB) produces clinical and hemodynamic benefits in patients with CHF who are already receiving ACE inhibitors. The therapeutic implications of ACE escape include evaluation of higher- than-standard doses of ACE inhibitors and routine addition of ARB to ACE inhibition in patients with severe CHF. Data are reviewed to demonstrate that ACE escape reflects inadequate ACE dosage rather than a decrease in ACE inhibition occurring with time.