RESUMO
Sexuality emerges from the interdependencies of biology, awareness, and the facts and artifacts of public life. A useful metaphor is that correct accountings of sexuality are not one-finger melodies--they are chords. Unfortunately, the physical vs. mental and nature vs. nurture controversies remain alive, well, and mischievous in regard to the correct understanding of human sexuality. Active political and legal disputes about homosexuality exemplify a continuing reliance on reductionistic models of the causes of conduct. Discourse relying on public misapprehension about biological causality can alter the course of subsequent science and public opinion and thus affect personal experience as well. Both dualistic and reductionistic models are traps and bar progress; the models should not be smuggled into accounts of sexuality.
