Clinical and laboratory parameters in blunt pelvic trauma not associated with subsequent positive conventional angiography in patients with positive CTA.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation and hematoma size on CTA as potential predictors of conventional angiogram (CA) results. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 380 adult patients presenting with pelvic trauma over a 9-year period. Of these patients, 91 were found to have active arterial extravasation on initial CTA. Statistical analysis between the two groups +CA versus -CA was performed to determine whether clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as extravasation size and hematoma size could predict CA results. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in all clinical and laboratory data, including hemodynamic instability (defined as systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) on presentation (22.2% vs. 21.4%), except for Glasgow Coma Scale (p = 0.015) when comparing the two groups. Extravasation size and hematoma size as continuous or categorical variables were not predictive of subsequent positive CA. Secondary analysis demonstrated no association between select parameters (i.e., hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, and lactate) and subsequent positive CA while controlling for extravasation size or hematoma size. CONCLUSION: Clinical and laboratory parameters in blunt pelvic trauma with arterial hemorrhage were not significantly associated with subsequent conventional angiography results, once accounting for degree of hemorrhage. The area of the foci of active extravasation and hematoma size in the axial plane were not significantly associated with the need for embolization. We conclude from these findings that catheter angiography should be considered in patients with blunt pelvic trauma found to have active arterial extravasation, regardless of size of bleed or the patient's clinical or laboratory values.

CTA measurements of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding size predict subsequent positive catheter angiography.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the measured size of active gastrointestinal hemorrhage was useful in predicting subsequent positive findings at catheter angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective study consisting of 32 patients with computed tomography angiography (CTA) positive for gastrointestinal bleeding who went on to receive catheter angiography. Each CTA was reviewed, with axial measurements of the anterior-posterior and transverse dimensions of the largest foci of hemorrhage recorded. Volumetric analysis was used to measure the volume of hemorrhage. These measurements were performed for both the arterial and portal venous phases. Additionally, the interval growth between the arterial and portal venous phase was also calculated. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the absolute size of the maximum transverse dimension on portal venous phase imaging (mean = 19.8 mm, p < 0.001), as well as an interval increase in transverse (mean = 8.5 mm, p < 0.001) and anteriorposterior (mean = 5.4 mm, p = 0.027) size between arterial and portal venous phases in patients with positive catheter angiography versus negative catheter angiography. There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of hemorrhage on arterial (mean = 1.72 cm3, p = 0.020) and portal venous phases (mean = 5.89 cm3, p = 0.016), as well as an interval change in the size of hemorrhage between the two phases (mean = 4.17 cm3, p = 0.020) in patients with positive catheter angiography versus patients in the negative catheter angiography group. CONCLUSIONS: The absolute axial size and volume of hemorrhage, as well as the interval change between the arterial and portal venous phases of CTA imaging is predictive of subsequent positive catheter angiography.

Time to conventional angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding: CT angiography compared to tagged RBC scan.

PURPOSE: To compare CT angiography (CTA) and tagged red blood cell (RBC) scan as a function of time from these initial imaging studies to subsequent conventional angiography and catheter-directed embolization in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study was conducted of 35 consecutive patients diagnosed with GI bleeding that received angiography for planned catheter-directed embolization. Of these patients, 20 were diagnosed with bleeding using a tagged RBC scan, whereas 15 were diagnosed using CTA. The lengths of time between diagnostic study order to study completion, diagnostic study completion to angiography, and total time from diagnostic study order to angiography were calculated. The results of both groups were compared using a t test with p value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean time from diagnostic study order to study completion was 3 h and 4 min for the CTA group and 5 h and 1 min for the tagged RBC scan group (p value = 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the time to angiography after completion of the preceding diagnostic study. The total mean time from diagnostic study order to intervention was 6 h and 8 min for the CTA group and 9 h and 29 min for the tagged RBC scan group, a statistically significant difference (p value = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring conventional angiography for GI bleeding, CT angiography results in a faster time to angiography than tagged RBC scan, which appears to be due to the longer duration required to complete the tagged RBC scan. Decreasing time to angiography is vital, as GI bleeding can be fatal and earlier diagnosis and intervention has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality, while also increasing sensitivity of angiography. These findings may assist ordering clinicians in deciding on the appropriate diagnostic study.