Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25343058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior to the implementation of the Hospital-Acquired Condition-Present on Admission (HAC-POA) payment policy, concerns regarding its potential impact were raised by a number of organizations and individuals. The purpose of this study was to explore direct and indirect effects of the HAC-POA payment policy on hospitals, patients, and other payers during the policy's first 3 years of implementation. METHODS: The study included semi-structured telephone interviews with representatives of national organizations, hospitals, patient advocacy organizations, and other payers. Interview notes were coded using QSR NVivo qualitative analysis software using inductive and deductive qualitative analysis techniques. We conducted interviews with 106 individuals representing 56 organizations. Hospital staff included physicians, nurses, patient safety officers, coders, and finance, senior management, and information management staff. Individuals from other organizations represented leadership positions. RESULTS: Key changes to hospitals included: cultural shifts involving attention, commitment, and support from hospital leadership for patient safety; hiring new staff to assure the accuracy of clinical documentation and POA oversight structures; increased time burden for physicians, nurses, and coders; need to upgrade or purchase new software; and need to collaborate with hospital departments or staff that did not interface directly in the past. The policy was adopted by a majority of other payers, although the list of conditions and payment penalties varies. The HAC-POA policy is invisible to patients; therefore, the presence or lack of unintended consequences to patients cannot be fully assessed at this time. Understanding of policy effects to all stakeholders is important for maximizing its successful implementation and desired impact.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Doença Iatrogênica/economia , Medicaid/economia , Medicare/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 48(4): 582-9, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636959

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Electronic medical records (EMRs) are increasingly viewed as essential tools for quality assurance and improvement in many care settings, but little is known about the use of EMRs by hospices in their quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) programs. OBJECTIVES: To examine the data sources hospices use to create quality indicators (QIs) used in their QAPI programs and to examine the domains of EMR-based QIs. METHODS: We used self-reported QIs (description, numerator, and denominator) from 911 hospices nationwide that participated in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services nationwide hospice voluntary reporting period. The data reflected QIs that hospices used for their internal QAPI programs between October 1 and December 31, 2011. We used the primary data sources for QIs reported by hospices and analyzed EMR-based QIs in terms of the quality domains and themes addressed. RESULTS: EMRs were the most frequent data source for the QIs reported, followed by family survey and paper medical record. Physical symptom management was the largest quality domain--included in 51.5% of the reported EMR-based QIs--followed by patient safety and structure and process of care. CONCLUSION: Most participating hospices use EMRs for retrieving items needed for QI calculations. EMR-based QIs address various quality domains and themes. Our findings present opportunities for potential future reporting of EMR-based quality data.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Registros de Saúde Pessoal , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/normas , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Significativo/normas , Uso Significativo/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Estados Unidos
3.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 38(2): 89-95, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22372256

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Learning (quality improvement) collaboratives are effective vehicles for driving coordinated organizational improvements. A central element of a learning collaborative is the change package-a catalogue of strategies, change concepts, and action steps that guide participants in their improvement efforts. Despite a vast literature describing learning collaboratives, little to no information is available on how the guiding strategies, change concepts, and action items are identified and developed to a replicable and actionable format that can be used to make measurable improvements within participating organizations. METHODS: The process for developing the change package for the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA) Patient Safety and Clinical Pharmacy Services Collaborative entailed environmental scan and identification of leading practices, case studies, interim debriefing meetings, data synthesis, and a technical expert panel meeting. Data synthesis involved end-of-day debriefings, systematic qualitative analyses, and the use of grounded theory and inductive data analysis techniques. This approach allowed systematic identification of innovative patient safety and clinical pharmacy practices that could be adopted in diverse environments. A case study approach enabled the research team to study practices in their natural environments. Use of grounded theory and inductive data analysis techniques enabled identification of strategies, change concepts, and actionable items that might not have been captured using different approaches. DISCUSSION: Use of systematic processes and qualitative methods in identification and translation of innovative practices can greatly accelerate the diffusion of innovations and practice improvements. This approach is effective whether or not an individual organization is part of a learning collaborative.


Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Aprendizagem , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Difusão de Inovações , Humanos , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Inovação Organizacional
4.
J Patient Saf ; 5(3): 160-7, 2009 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19927049

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify strategies for safe medication use practices in ambulatory care settings, with a special focus on clinical pharmacy services. METHODS: We conducted case studies on 34 organizations, more than half of which were safety net providers. Data included discussions with 186 key informants, 3 interim debriefings, and a technical expert panel. We analyzed qualitative data using inductive analysis techniques and grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Ambulatory care organizations practice a broad range of safe medication use strategies. The inclusion of clinical pharmacy services is a culture change that supports efforts to improve patient safety and patient-centered care. Organizations integrated clinical pharmacy services when they introduced such services in a purposefully paced and gradual manner. Organizations sustained such services when they collected and reported data demonstrating improvements in patient outcomes and cost savings. Clinical pharmacy services were generally accompanied by strategies that helped organizations to provide patient-centered care; collect and measure process, safety, and clinical outcomes; promote leadership commitment; and integrate care delivery processes. These strategies interacted within organizations in synergistic rather than hierarchical or linear way. Organizational ability to provide safe, patient-centered, and efficient care that is supported by measurable data largely depends on leadership commitment and ability to integrate care processes. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory care organizations use multiple strategies for safe medication use systems. Understanding processes that promote such strategies will provide a helpful road map for other organizations in implementation and sustainability of safe medication use systems.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente , Competência Cultural , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Liderança , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Estados Unidos
5.
Med Care Res Rev ; 65(6): 655-73, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18596176

RESUMO

This article describes physicians' responses to patient questions and physicians' views about public reports on hospital quality. Interviews with 56 office-based physicians in seven states/regions used hypothetical scenarios of patients questioning referrals based on public reports of hospital quality. Responses were analyzed using an iterative coding process to develop categories and themes from data. Four themes describe physicians' responses to patients: (a) rely on existing physician-patient relationships, (b) acknowledge and consider patient perspectives, (c) take actions to follow up on patient concerns, and (d) provide patients' perspectives on quality reports. Three themes summarize responses to hospital quality reports: perceived lack of methodological rigor, content considerations in reports, and attitudes/experience regarding reports. Findings suggest that physicians take seriously patients' questions about hospital-quality reports and consider changing referral recommendations based on their concerns and/or preferences. Results underscore the importance of efforts by report developers and physician outreach/education to address physicians' methodological concerns.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais/normas , Notificação de Abuso , Médicos/psicologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Estados Unidos
6.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 88(12): 1737-9, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18047896

RESUMO

Better measurement of the case-mix complexity of patients receiving rehabilitation services is critical to understanding variations in the outcomes achieved by patients treated in different postacute care (PAC) settings. The Medicare program recognized this issue and is undertaking a major initiative to develop a new patient-assessment instrument that would standardize case-mix measurement in inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home health agencies. The new instrument, called the Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation Tool, builds on the scientific advances in measurement to develop standard measures of medical acuity, functional status, cognitive impairment, and social support related to resource need, outcomes, and continuity of care for use in all PAC settings.


Assuntos
Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Política de Saúde , Medicare/tendências , Reabilitação/tendências , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Humanos , Medicare/economia , Sistema de Pagamento Prospectivo , Reabilitação/normas , Estados Unidos
7.
Med Care Res Rev ; 64(5): 600-14, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17717379

RESUMO

Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems (CAHPS) is an organized effort to provide consumers with standardized, comprehensible, and usable data regarding consumers' experiences with health care. In its Medicare and other summary reports, CAHPS emphasizes the frequency of the most positive experiences. Cognitive models of survey response combined with attitude theory suggest that performance measurement might be further improved by the addition of problem-oriented reporting, which highlights the frequency of negative experiences. We propose criteria and use them to assess whether problem-oriented reporting provides valid, precise, and complementary information. Analysis of the 2000 CAHPS Medicare Fee-For-Service and 2001 CAHPS Medicare Advantage survey data shows that problem-oriented reporting (1) is viable, interpretable, and unlikely to represent noise; (2) has statistical power sufficient to capture important differences of magnitudes commonly observed; and (3) provides information that complements standard reporting.


Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Serviços de Informação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/classificação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estados Unidos
8.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 25(1): 106-18, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16403750

RESUMO

In this paper we compare physician referral patterns, quality, patient satisfaction, and community benefits of physician-owned specialty versus peer competitor hospitals. Our results are based on evidence gathered from site visits to six markets, 2003 Medicare claims, patient focus groups, and Internal Revenue Service data. Although physician-owners are more likely than others to refer to their own facilities and treat a healthier population, there are rationales for these patterns aside from motives for profit. Specialty hospitals provide generally high-quality care to satisfied patients. Uncompensated care plus specialty hospitals' taxes represent a greater burden, in percentage terms, than community benefits provided by nonprofit providers.


Assuntos
Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Hospitais Comunitários/organização & administração , Hospitais Especializados/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Competição Econômica , Hospitais Comunitários/economia , Hospitais Especializados/economia , Entrevistas como Assunto , Propriedade , Estados Unidos
9.
JAMA ; 291(14): 1744-52, 2004 Apr 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15082702

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Since 2000, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has been collecting information on beneficiaries' experiences with health care for Medicare managed care (MMC) and traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. OBJECTIVES: To compare beneficiary experiences with managed care and FFS arrangements throughout the country and to assess the stability of those differences over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: CMS administered managed care and FFS versions of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) survey to samples of beneficiaries (aged > or =65 years) from Medicare + Choice MMC organizations and from geographic strata within the traditional FFS Medicare program. We analyzed responses collected in 2000 and 2001 from 497,869 respondents: 299,058 beneficiaries enrolled in MMC plans (response rate, 82%) and 198,811 enrolled in FFS Medicare (response rate, 68%). Differences between MMC and FFS within states were assessed after adjustment for case mix and nonresponse. For estimates at the regional and national level, state estimates were combined after weighting by the MMC enrollment in the state. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Four overall ratings (of the plan, personal physician, care received overall, and care received from specialists), 5 measures summarizing beneficiaries' experiences with care (getting care needed; getting care quickly; communication with clinicians; courtesy and respect of physician's office staff; and paperwork, information, and customer service), and reports of receipt of 3 preventive services (flu shots, pneumococcal vaccinations, and being advised to quit smoking) were assessed. RESULTS: Respondents in MMC and FFS plans were similar to each other and to the Medicare population as a whole. Nationally, FFS Medicare beneficiaries rated experiences with care measured by the CAHPS survey higher than did MMC beneficiaries; for instance, in ratings of care received overall (scale of 1-10) (8.91 FFS vs 8.86 MMC, P<.001, in 2000; and 8.88 FFS vs 8.78 MMC, P<.001, in 2001). Differences between FFS and MMC varied across states, however. Managed care enrollees reported significantly fewer problems with paperwork, information, and customer service (2.62 FFS vs 2.55 MMC, P<.001, in 2000; and 2.59 FFS vs 2.51 MMC, P<.001, in 2001). Enrollees in MMC were also more likely to report having received immunizations for influenza and pneumococcus (from any source) (in 2000, 77% of MMC vs 63% of FFS respondents; P<.001), and smokers were more likely to report having received counseling to quit smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that managed care was better at delivering preventive services, whereas traditional Medicare was better in other aspects of care related to access and beneficiary experiences. These relative strengths should be considered when policy decisions are made that affect the availability of choice or influence beneficiaries to choose one model of care over another.


Assuntos
Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/normas , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Medicare/organização & administração , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/normas , Modelos Organizacionais , Medicina Preventiva , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Risco Ajustado , Estados Unidos
10.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 29(1): 51-66, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14992484

RESUMO

We examined how five integrated delivery systems make decisions about and implement clinical information systems. Using case study methods, we identified general themes and explored how organizational context factors and information technology characteristics affect adoption and implementation processes.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Difusão de Inovações , Pessoal Administrativo , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Modelos Organizacionais , Pesquisa Operacional , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Cultura Organizacional , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...