An anthropomorphic breathing phantom of the thorax for testing new motion mitigation techniques for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Motion-induced range changes and incorrectly placed dose spots strongly affect the quality of pencil-beam-scanned (PBS) proton therapy, especially in thoracic tumour sites, where density changes are large. Thus motion-mitigation techniques are necessary, which must be validated in a realistic patient-like geometry. We report on the development and characterisation of a dynamic, anthropomorphic, thorax phantom that can realistically mimic thoracic motions and anatomical features for verifications of proton and photon 4D treatments. The presented phantom is of an average thorax size, and consists of inflatable, deformable lungs surrounded by a skeleton and skin. A mobile 'tumour' is embedded in the lungs in which dosimetry devices (such as radiochromic films) can be inserted. Motion of the tumour and deformation of the thorax is controlled via a custom made pump system driving air into and out of the lungs. Comprehensive commissioning tests have been performed to evaluate the mechanical performance of the phantom, its visibility on CT and MR imaging and its feasibility for dosimetric validation of 4D proton treatments. The phantom performed well on both regular and irregular pre-programmed breathing curves, reaching peak-to-peak amplitudes in the tumour of <20 mm. Some hysteresis in the inflation versus deflation phases was seen. All materials were clearly visualised in CT scans, and all, except the bone and lung components, were MRI visible. Radiochromic film measurements in the phantom showed that imaging for repositioning was required (as for a patient treatment). Dosimetry was feasible with Gamma Index agreements (4%/4 mm) between film dose and planned dose >90% in the central planes of the target. The results of this study demonstrate that this anthropomorphic thorax phantom is suitable for imaging and dosimetric studies in a thoracic geometry closely-matched to lung cancer patients under realistic motion conditions.

Quantifying the impact of respiratory-gated 4D CT acquisition on thoracic image quality: a digital phantom study.

PURPOSE: Prospective respiratory-gated 4D CT has been shown to reduce tumor image artifacts by up to 50% compared to conventional 4D CT. However, to date no studies have quantified the impact of gated 4D CT on normal lung tissue imaging, which is important in performing dose calculations based on accurate estimates of lung volume and structure. To determine the impact of gated 4D CT on thoracic image quality, the authors developed a novel simulation framework incorporating a realistic deformable digital phantom driven by patient tumor motion patterns. Based on this framework, the authors test the hypothesis that respiratory-gated 4D CT can significantly reduce lung imaging artifacts. METHODS: Our simulation framework synchronizes the 4D extended cardiac torso (XCAT) phantom with tumor motion data in a quasi real-time fashion, allowing simulation of three 4D CT acquisition modes featuring different levels of respiratory feedback: (i) "conventional" 4D CT that uses a constant imaging and couch-shift frequency, (ii) "beam paused" 4D CT that interrupts imaging to avoid oversampling at a given couch position and respiratory phase, and (iii) "respiratory-gated" 4D CT that triggers acquisition only when the respiratory motion fulfills phase-specific displacement gating windows based on prescan breathing data. Our framework generates a set of ground truth comparators, representing the average XCAT anatomy during beam-on for each of ten respiratory phase bins. Based on this framework, the authors simulated conventional, beam-paused, and respiratory-gated 4D CT images using tumor motion patterns from seven lung cancer patients across 13 treatment fractions, with a simulated 5.5 cm(3) spherical lesion. Normal lung tissue image quality was quantified by comparing simulated and ground truth images in terms of overall mean square error (MSE) intensity difference, threshold-based lung volume error, and fractional false positive/false negative rates. RESULTS: Averaged across all simulations and phase bins, respiratory-gating reduced overall thoracic MSE by 46% compared to conventional 4D CT (p ∼ 10(-19)). Gating leads to small but significant (p < 0.02) reductions in lung volume errors (1.8%-1.4%), false positives (4.0%-2.6%), and false negatives (2.7%-1.3%). These percentage reductions correspond to gating reducing image artifacts by 24-90 cm(3) of lung tissue. Similar to earlier studies, gating reduced patient image dose by up to 22%, but with scan time increased by up to 135%. Beam paused 4D CT did not significantly impact normal lung tissue image quality, but did yield similar dose reductions as for respiratory-gating, without the added cost in scanning time. CONCLUSIONS: For a typical 6 L lung, respiratory-gated 4D CT can reduce image artifacts affecting up to 90 cm(3) of normal lung tissue compared to conventional acquisition. This image improvement could have important implications for dose calculations based on 4D CT. Where image quality is less critical, beam paused 4D CT is a simple strategy to reduce imaging dose without sacrificing acquisition time.

Comparative study of layered and volumetric rescanning for different scanning speeds of proton beam in liver patients.

In recent years, particle therapy has become a widely accepted form of cancer treatment and technological advances in beam delivery technology (i.e. pencil beam scanning (PBS)) have enabled the application of highly conformal dose distributions to static targets. Current research focuses on the possibilities for the treatment of mobile targets with these techniques. Of different motion mitigation methods being investigated, rescanning is perhaps the easiest to apply clinically. In general however, different PBS delivery systems exhibit a different temporal parameter space between delivery and target motions, due to the system specific beam position adjustment times (BPATs). Depending on these BPATs, dosimetric effects appearing during irradiation of moving targets vary significantly. In this work, volumetric and layered rescanning were compared for four different scenarios--a combination of fast and slow BPATs laterally (4 ms and 10 ms) and in depth (80 ms and 1 s); and nine different treatment plan arrangements for two clinical liver cases. 4D dose calculations were performed assuming regular, sinusoidal rigid motion as a worst-case motion scenario to model interplay effects. Calculations were sampled over three different starting phases resulting in a total of 432 dose distributions. It was found that layered rescanning is the method of choice for slow scanning systems, both in terms of dose homogeneity (D5-95 values are lower by up to 16% with layered rescanning) and in the estimated treatment delivery times (reduction of up to 300 s with layered rescanning). Analysis of dose homogeneity showed that layered rescanning leads to a smoother decrease in dose inhomogeneity as a function of the number of rescans than volumetric rescanning, which shows larger fluctuations. However, layered rescanning appears to be more sensitive to the starting phase. When analyzing the performance of both approaches and different scanning speeds as a function of delivery time, layered rescanning appears to be the only viable approach for slow energy changing systems, even approaching the performance of fast energy changing systems, as long as lateral scanning speeds are kept high. Similar results were found for multiple field plans and when analyzing different field directions.