Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in posterior cervicothoracic fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein in a cohort of 450 patients.

OBJECTIVE Fusions across the cervicothoracic junction have been challenging because of the large biomechanical forces exerted resulting in frequent reoperations for nonunions. The objective of this study was to investigate a retrospective cohort using chart review of posterior cervicothoracic spine fusions with and without bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and to determine the reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions in both groups. METHODS Between January 2009 and September 2013, posterior cervicothoracic spine fusion cases were identified from a large spine registry (Kaiser Permanente). Demographics, diagnoses, operative times, lengths of stay, and reoperations were extracted from the registry. Reoperations for symptomatic nonunions were adjudicated via chart review. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Kaplan-Meier curves for the non-BMP and BMP groups were generated and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS In this cohort there were 450 patients (32.7% with BMP) with a median follow-up of 1.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.5-2.7 years). Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant difference in reoperation rates for nonunions using the log-rank test (p = 0.088). In a subset of patients with more than 1 year of follow-up, 260 patients were identified (43.1% with BMP) with a median follow-up duration of 2.4 years (IQR 1.6-3.3 years). There was no statistically significant difference in the symptomatic operative nonunion rates for posterior cervicothoracic fusions with and without BMP (0.0% vs 2.7%, respectively; p = 0.137) for more than 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the largest series of patients using BMP in posterior cervicothoracic spine fusions. Reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions with more than 1 year of follow-up were 0% with BMP and 2.7% without BMP. No statistically significant difference in the reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions with or without BMP was found.

Occipitocervical Fusions in Elderly Patients: Mortality and Reoperation Rates From a National Spine Registry.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown excellent fusion rates in occipitocervical (OC) fusions, but very little is reported on mortality and reoperation rates in elderly patients. Our article reports these rates in elderly patients from a national spine registry with a >2-year follow-up period. METHODS: Using data from a spine implant registry developed at a large integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente), elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with instrumented OC fusions between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2013 were identified. Patients' demographics were extracted from the registry. From chart review, the types of hardware and bone graft used, as well as mortality and reoperations rates were noted. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with OC fusions were identified. Six patients had reoperations related to their fusions. Two occurred in the same patient, which resulted in a 14.9% reoperation rate. There were a total of 13 deaths (27.7%), with 7 occurring within 3 months, but only 4 (8.5%) related to the procedure. Bone morphogenetic protein was used in 29 patients (85.3%, 29/34). All cases used occipital plates with rods and screws. There was 1 nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate was 27.7% and the reoperations rate was 14.9% for patients who underwent OC fusions with age >65 years and were observed for >2 years. These numbers are much higher than in younger patients, but reflect a higher mortality due to their comorbidities and from progression of their disease for cases of metastasis to the spine.

Reoperation Rates for Symptomatic Nonunions in Anterior Cervical Fusions From a National Spine Registry.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study with chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level anterior cervical discectomies and fusions (ACDFs) from a national spine registry. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is very little data reported in the literature on reoperation rates for symptomatic nonunions after ACDFs. The reported nonunion rates are primarily based on radiographical evidence, although some of these may be asymptomatic. Similarly, there may be symptomatic patients with nonunions who elect not to have a reoperation. We think, however, data from a national spine registry provide a realistic and unbiased assessment of routine cervical spine fusion care and represent a heterogeneous population with varied indications and surgical techniques and are best suited to determine reoperations for symptomatic nonunions. METHODS: Using data from a Spine Implant Registry developed at a large integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente), patients with ACDFs between January 2009 and December 2012 with 2-year follow-up were identified. Patient characteristics, admitting diagnosis, and number of levels fused were extracted from the registry. Reoperations for symptomatic nonunions from the index spinal procedure were identified by chart review. RESULTS: A cohort of 1054 patients with more than 2 years of follow-up were found to have reoperations for nonunions of 0.2%, 2.9%, and 6.5% for 1-level, 2-level, and 3-level ACDFs, respectively. CONCLUSION: A large cohort of ACDF patients with more than 2 years of follow-up had reoperations for nonunion rates significantly lower than reported in the literature for radiographical nonunions. We think our data add to the literature an important parameter (reoperations for nonunion rates) and provide useful information for patients, spine surgeons, and health care payers.