A combined, bioidentical, oral, 17ß-estradiol and progesterone capsule for the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms due to menopause.

Introduction: Many women seek treatment to alleviate menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Numerous women use combination compounded hormone therapy (CHT) to achieve the benefits of estrogen/progesterone for endometrial protection. TX-001HR is a combination of bioidentical 17ß-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) in a single capsule designed for continuous daily use to treat moderate to severe VMS. Areas covered: This drug profile describes the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of this E2/P4 (mg/mg: 1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50, 0.25/50) for treating moderate to severe VMS in menopausal woman with a uterus. Expert opinion: In REPLENISH (NCT01942668), the two highest doses of TX-001HR significantly reduced VMS frequency and severity at 4 and 12 weeks versus placebo (co-primary endpoints); all doses met the primary endpoint of endometrial safety. Rates of amenorrhea were high and improved over time; the Menopause Quality of Life and Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep instruments improved with E2/P4. TX-001HR was well tolerated and had no clinically significant impact on vital signs, metabolic or coagulation parameters, or breast safety. The combination bioidentical E2/P4 capsule (1 mg/100 mg dose was FDA-approved as Bijuva in October 2018) may provide a safe, effective, rigorously studied alternative for women with a uterus who prefer CHT for relief of VMS.

Prescribing of FDA-approved and compounded hormone therapy differs by specialty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prescribing patterns of general practitioners (GPs), obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), and wellness physicians (WPs) of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) for both compounded (CHT) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved products, using a survey of US physicians. METHODS: Nine thousand one US physicians were invited to participate in a survey to report on their HT-prescribing patterns. Physicians were eligible if they prescribed HT for at least six patients per month. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 440 eligible physicians (893 responded of 9,001 invited) including 171 GPs, 170 OB/GYNs, and 84 WPs. Physicians prescribed HT for 15% to 30% of their female patients, with WPs numerically most likely to prescribe HT. Menopausal symptoms were the leading reason for HT prescriptions among all specialties. WPs seemed more likely to prescribe HT for general/cardiovascular health (28%), and for shorter durations, than other specialties. WPs prescribed proportionally more compounded (vs FDA-approved) estrogens/progestogens than GPs or OB/GYNs, but OB/GYNs seemed to prescribe more compounded dehydroepiandrosterone and testosterone (prescribed alone) than did others. OB/GYNs seemed least likely to consider CHT being more safe or effective than FDA-approved HT. Symptom relief was the main determinant of efficacy for all specialties; WPs also used blood (61%) or saliva testing (25%) for dose adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Although all physician specialties surveyed prescribed HT, differences in prescribing CHT versus FDA-approved formulations by medical specialty/practice seemed to exist. Of those surveyed, OB/GYNs and GPs prescribed proportionally more FDA-approved HT, whereas WPs, similarly, prescribed more CHT. More discussion is needed concerning physicians' decisions to prescribe CHT versus FDA-approved formulations.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 pilot trial evaluating a novel, vaginal softgel capsule containing solubilized estradiol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vaginal estradiol (E2) softgel capsules for moderate-to-severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). Previous phase 1 studies showed lower systemic estrogen concentrations with this softgel capsule compared with an approved low-dose vaginal E2 tablet. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study, 50 postmenopausal women (aged 40-75 y) with at least1 moderate-to-severe VVA symptom received 10 µg vaginal E2 softgel capsules or placebo daily for 14 days. Changes from baseline in vaginal maturation index, investigator's assessment of vaginal mucosa (secretions, epithelial integrity, epithelial surface thickness, color), vaginal pH, and most bothersome symptom were assessed. Adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the percentage of superficial (35.2 percentage points [pp] vs 8.75 pp; P = 0.0002) and intermediate (18.7 pp vs -3.54 pp; P = 0.0017) cells increased from baseline significantly more with vaginal E2 capsules, and parabasal cells decreased significantly more (-54.4 pp vs -4.80 pp; P < 0.0001). Vaginal pH decreased significantly more with vaginal E2 capsules (-0.974 vs -0.339; P = 0.0002). Decreases in severity of atrophic effects on vaginal epithelial integrity (-0.342 vs 0.176; P = 0.0001) and secretions (-0.643 vs -0.274; P = 0.0401) were significantly greater with vaginal E2 capsules vs placebo. There was no statistical difference in most bothersome symptom severity change from baseline. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal E2 softgel capsules are a safe, effective, local treatment option for postmenopausal women with moderate-to-severe VVA, with lower systemic estrogen absorption than currently available intravaginal treatments.

Behaviours and attitudes influencing treatment decisions for menopausal symptoms in five European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess women's behaviours and attitudes regarding the treatment of menopausal symptoms in five European countries. STUDY DESIGN: Women aged ≥45 years in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom participated in an internet survey. Completers were those who reported menopausal symptoms and had treated their symptoms. Women were equally stratified by age (45-54 years, 55-64 years, ≥65 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behaviours, attitudes, and experiences regarding treatment of menopausal symptoms. RESULTS: Of 3890 peri- to postmenopausal women screened, 67% experienced symptoms and 54% sought either medical input or some treatment concerning their symptoms. Hot flushes, the most common symptom, decreased with age but remained prevalent after age 64. Roughly 75% of women who sought relief consulted a physician, mostly a gynaecologist or a general practitioner (GP) as in the United Kingdom. The decision to seek treatment was influenced by age, number, and severity of symptoms. Approximately 79% visiting a physician received prescription therapy. Of the women who received non-hormone therapy (HT) treatment instead of HT: patients refused HT (20-44%), physicians did not discuss HT (32-46%), or advised against HT (24-43%). Women in the United Kingdom were most familiar with and favorable to HT. Interest in a new HT (34-50%) was higher than use (19-28%). CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal symptoms are common, persistent, and bothersome, but many fail to seek treatment. Sources and types of treatment vary among age groups and countries. Education regarding women's attitudes toward treatment should be provided to those physicians who treat menopausal symptoms in each country.

17ß-Estradiol and natural progesterone for menopausal hormone therapy: REPLENISH phase 3 study design of a combination capsule and evidence review.

Several formulations combining estrogens and progestins for hormone therapy (HT) have been approved worldwide for the treatment of menopausal symptoms, yet recent data indicate a decline in their use and an increase in compounded bioidentical HT. Up to now, no single product combining natural 17ß-estradiol and progesterone has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A phase 3 trial (REPLENISH) is underway to study a novel oral formulation of solubilized 17ß-estradiol and natural progesterone combined in a single gelatin capsule (TX-001HR; TherapeuticsMD, Inc, Boca Raton, FL) for treating vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in postmenopausal women. The REPLENISH trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of TX-001HR (4 doses) versus placebo for the reduction of moderate to severe VMS frequency and severity at 4 and 12 weeks and evaluates the endometrial safety of the combinations at 1 year. TX-001HR contains hormones that are molecularly identical to endogenous estradiol and progesterone and is intended as an option for women who prefer bioidentical hormones; further, it does not contain peanut oil, a common allergen. The constituents of TX-001HR, in a pharmacokinetic report, showed similar bioavailability and safety compared with reference estradiol tablets and micronized progesterone capsules administered together. Published data suggest a safer profile of estradiol and natural progesterone compared with HT containing conjugated equine estrogens and progestins. This report summarizes the methodology of the REPLENISH trial and reviews the evidence suggesting clinical differences between HT containing progesterone or progestins, and estradiol or conjugated equine estrogens.