Development of a Competency Assessment Framework for Pharmacy Residents Participating in High-Fidelity Simulation and Creation of the SIMPHARM Assessment Tool.

Background: Simulations are used to improve professional practice across multiple health professions; however, the application of simulations in pharmacy curricula has been limited by a lack of evidence. Objectives: To delineate the competencies of pharmacy residents needed to assess their progress while participating in a high-fidelity simulation training program and to create a reliable assessment tool based on these competencies. Methods: A literature review was conducted, followed by application of a modified Delphi method. An assessment tool based on the results of these activities was drafted (in French). A second modified Delphi process was carried out to assess the reliability of the tool, and the tool was modified accordingly. Results: The literature search yielded a total of 2670 articles, of which 289 were included for analysis. The first modified Delphi process involved 19 experts in the first round and 10 experts in the second round. The Cronbach α was 0.866 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.713-0.960), indicating good reliability. A total of 7 competencies were retained for inclusion in the SIMPHARM assessment tool: professionalism, leadership, teamwork, communication, critical thinking, preparation and packaging of medications, and pharmaceutical calculations. The second modified Delphi process involved 9 experts in the first round and 11 experts in the second round. The final Cronbach α was 0.877 (95% CI 0.741-0.960). Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this was one of the largest studies exploring pharmacy competencies in the context of simulations. This work yielded a reliable framework for the assessment of pharmacy residents' competencies. This assessment tool may help evaluators in assessing the competencies of pharmacy trainees after simulation training.

Contexte: Les simulations sont utilisées dans le but d'améliorer la pratique professionnelle de plusieurs professions de la santé; cependant, le manque de données probantes limite leur application dans les programmes d'enseignement en pharmacie. Objectifs: Décrire les compétences nécessaires pour évaluer le progrès des résidents en pharmacie qui participent à une formation basée sur un programme de simulation haute-fidélité; et mettre au point un outil d'évaluation fiable qui se base sur ces compétences. Méthodologie: Une revue de littérature a été effectuée, avant d'appliquer une méthode Delphi modifiée et de faire l'ébauche d'un outil d'évaluation (en français) basé sur les résultats de ces activités. Une deuxième méthode Delphi modifiée a été appliquée pour évaluer la fiabilité de l'outil et celui-ci a fait l'objet de modifications en conséquence. Résultats: La revue de littérature a donné un total de 2670 articles, parmi lesquels 289 ont été inclus à des fins d'analyse. La première méthode Delphi modifiée a impliqué 19 experts pour la première phase, et 10 pour la seconde. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach était de 0,866 (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 % 0,713­0,960), indiquant une bonne fiabilité. Au total, 7 compétences à inclure dans l'outil d'évaluation ont été retenues: professionnalisme, leadership, travail d'équipe, communication, pensée critique, préparation et conditionnement des médicaments, et calculs pharmaceutiques. La deuxième méthode Delphi modifiée impliquait quant à elle 9 experts pour la première phase et 11 pour la seconde. Le coefficient alpha de Cronbach final était de 0,877 (IC à 95 % 0,741­0,960). Conclusions: À la connaissance des auteurs, cette étude était l'une des plus importantes se penchant sur les compétences en pharmacie dans le contexte des simulations. Ce travail a donné lieu à un cadre de référence fiable pour évaluer les compétences des résidents en pharmacie. Cet outil d'évaluation pourrait aider les évaluateurs à évaluer les compétences des stagiaires à la suite d'une formation par simulation.

Albumin administration is associated with acute kidney injury in cardiac surgery: a propensity score analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) with the use of albumin-containing fluids compared to starches in the surgical intensive care setting remains uncertain. We evaluated the adjusted risk of AKI associated with colloids following cardiac surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery in a tertiary care center from 2008 to 2010. We assessed crystalloid and colloid administration until 36 hours after surgery. AKI was defined by the RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease) risk and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage 1 serum creatinine criterion within 96 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Our cohort included 984 patients with a baseline glomerular filtration rate of 72 ± 19 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Twenty-three percent had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), thirty-one percent were diabetics and twenty-three percent underwent heart valve surgery. The incidence of AKI was 5.3% based on RIFLE risk and 12.0% based on the AKIN criterion. AKI was associated with a reduced LVEF, diuretic use, anemia, heart valve surgery, duration of extracorporeal circulation, hemodynamic instability and the use of albumin, pentastarch 10% and transfusions. There was an important dose-dependent AKI risk associated with the administration of albumin, which also paralleled a higher prevalence of concomitant risk factors for AKI. To address any indication bias, we derived a propensity score predicting the likelihood to receive albumin and matched 141 cases to 141 controls with a similar risk profile. In this analysis, albumin was associated with an increased AKI risk (RIFLE risk: 12% versus 5%, P = 0.03; AKIN stage 1: 28% versus 13%, P = 0.002). We repeated this methodology in patients without postoperative hemodynamic instability and still identified an association between the use of albumin and AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin administration was associated with a dose-dependent risk of AKI and remained significant using a propensity score methodology. Future studies should address the safety of albumin-containing fluids on kidney function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Evaluation of the Use of Intravenous Iron Supplements in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Department.

Background: The use of intravenous (IV) iron sucrose was approved for the obstetric and gynecologic (OBGYN) population at our mother-child teaching hospital in 2006 for intolerance or nonresponse to oral iron supplements, contraindication to intramuscular (IM) iron, and rapid increase of the hemoglobin desired in iron-deficient patients. Objectives: (a) To describe the indications and doses of IV iron sucrose used in OBGYN, (b) to assess monitoring, and (c) to describe the adverse effect profile. Methods: A retrospective study of patients admitted to the OBGYN wards with at least one prescription of IV iron from January 1, 2006, to March 31, 2010, was conducted. A standardized data collection sheet was used to record data. Results: A total of 164 prescriptions of IV iron were reviewed in 128 women. The indications for IV iron were anemia before delivery (n = 76), intolerance or no response to oral iron (n = 61), or intolerance or contraindication to IM iron (n = 27). Fourteen doses (9%) were appropriate, and the others were too low. Prior to prescription, ferritin or serum iron levels were assessed in 31% of women and hemoglobin electrophoresis in nearly all of Black or Asian women. One-week follow-up hemoglobin levels were measured after 66 prescriptions (40.2%). Adverse effects, mostly pain at the injection site, were reported in 18 (11%) occasions. Conclusions: IV iron is prescribed in OBGYN patients to obtain a rapid hemoglobin increase or when oral iron is not tolerated or inefficacious. The dose prescribed is generally too low, baseline essential testing often omitted, and appropriate follow-up monitoring incomplete. IV iron is well tolerated.