Treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: guidelines and new clinical trial results.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). The American College of Rheumatology (ACR), in conjunction with the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), recently published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD, including SSc-ILD. Herein, we summarize evidence from randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of SSc-ILD. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we present findings from recent randomized controlled trials in SSc-ILD. The pharmacologic therapies discussed include immunosuppressive medications (mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and tocilizumab) and antifibrotic medications (nintedanib and pirfenidone). SUMMARY: Randomized trials provide an evidence base for the SSc-ILD treatment recommendations put forth in the ACR/CHEST Guidelines for the treatment of ILD in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. These guidelines will help inform clinical practice and highlight areas in which further research is needed.

Cross-Phenotype GWAS Supports Shared Genetic Susceptibility to Systemic Sclerosis and Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Objective: An increased risk of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been reported in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Our study aims to investigate the shared genetic susceptibility between the two disorders and to define candidate causal genes using cross-phenotype GWAS meta-analysis. Methods: We performed cross-phenotype GWAS meta-analysis and colocalization analysis for SSc and PBC. We performed both genome-wide and locus-based analysis, including tissue and pathway enrichment analyses, fine-mapping, colocalization analyses with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) datasets, and phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS). Finally, we used an integrative approach to prioritize candidate causal genes from the novel loci. Results: We detected a strong genetic correlation between SSc and PBC (rg = 0.84, p = 1.7 × 10-6). In the cross-phenotype GWAS meta-analysis, we identified 44 non-HLA loci that reached genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10-8). Evidence of shared causal variants between SSc and PBC was found for nine loci, five of which were novel. Integrating multiple sources of evidence, we prioritized CD40, ERAP1, PLD4, SPPL3, and CCDC113 as novel candidate causal genes. The CD40 risk locus colocalized with trans-pQTLs of multiple plasma proteins involved in B cell function. Conclusion: Our study supports a strong shared genetic susceptibility between SSc and PBC. Through cross-phenotype analyses, we have prioritized several novel candidate causal genes and pathways for these disorders.

The Impact of Autoantibodies on Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ASCEND Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines recommend autoimmune serological testing in patients newly diagnosed with interstitial lung disease of apparently unknown cause who may have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), in order to exclude connective tissue disease (CTD). Autoantibody positivity has been associated with unique patient profiles and prognosis in patients with IPF who otherwise lack a CTD diagnosis. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of patients with IPF from the Phase III ASCEND trial (NCT01366209) evaluated the association of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) status with baseline disease characteristics, disease progression [percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), forced vital capacity (FVC) volume and progression-free survival (PFS)], and treatment outcomes with pirfenidone and placebo (%FVC, FVC and PFS). RESULTS: Of 555 participants, 244/514 (47.5%) were ANA positive (ANA+), 83/514 (16.1%) had high ANA+ (ANA titre ≥ 1:160 or positive nucleolar- or centromere-staining patterns), 60/555 (10.8%) were RF positive (RF+) and/or anti-CCP positive (anti-CCP+) and 270/514 (52.5%) were autoantibody negative (AAb-). Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally comparable between autoantibody subgroups. Although not statistically significant, more placebo-treated participants with ANA+ or high ANA+ had a decline from baseline to Week 52 of ≥ 10% in %FVC or death (48.7% and 55.9%, respectively) or in FVC volume or death (48.7% and 47.1%, respectively) compared with the AAb- group (%FVC or death: 42.0%; FVC volume or death: 42.0%). The RF+ and/or anti-CCP+ group was similar to AAb-. No differences were observed in PFS. A treatment benefit for pirfenidone versus placebo was observed regardless of autoantibody status [PFS: ANA+ HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.37 to 0.86), P = 0.007; AAb- HR (95% CI): 0.50 (0.32 to 0.78), P = 0.002]. CONCLUSION: IPF disease course did not differ by autoantibody status in ASCEND. Pirfenidone had a treatment benefit regardless of the presence of ANA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01366209.

People with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis sometimes have abnormal antibodies, called autoantibodies, in their blood. Uncommonly, autoantibodies may mistakenly target the person's own tissues, including the lungs. It is unknown whether these autoantibodies cause idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or make it worse. This analysis looked at data from the ASCEND clinical trial in people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, who were split randomly into two groups to receive tablets of either a medicine called pirfenidone or a placebo for 52 weeks. One goal was to see whether people with certain autoantibodies called antinuclear antibodies ('ANA' for short), rheumatoid factor ('RF') and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide ('anti-CCP') had different traits from people without autoantibodies, such as age, race or smoking history. Other goals were to see if autoantibodies affected (1) how well people's lungs worked during the trial, (2) how quickly people's idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis got worse or they died and (3) how well pirfenidone worked. The analysis showed that most traits were similar in people with and without autoantibodies. In people who received placebo, the change in lung function during the trial was not different for people with ANA, RF or anti-CCP compared with people with no autoantibodies. People who received pirfenidone were less likely to have worsening lung function, or die, than people who received placebo, regardless of whether or not they had autoantibodies. Doctors evaluating patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis should consider the impact of autoantibodies and feel confident that pirfenidone is effective regardless of whether or not autoantibodies are present.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

Assessing Patient Values and Preferences to Inform the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians Interstitial Lung Disease Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: Patient engagement is critical to clinical practice guideline (CPG) development. This work presents our approach to ascertaining patients' values and preferences to inform the American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study of a purposefully sampled Patient Panel using a modified content analytic approach. The study team reviewed text transcripts from the Patient Panel discussion to identify themes and develop a clustered thematic schema. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (75% women) participated, with a mean age of 53 years (range 33-73). Patients had one or more SARDs: systemic sclerosis (38%), Sjögren disease (38%), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (33%), rheumatoid arthritis (24%), and mixed connective tissue disease (10%). We identified 10 themes in 4 thematic clusters: communication, screening and monitoring, treatment goals, and treatment adverse effects. Patients prioritized recognizing ILD symptoms, importance of ILD screening and close monitoring, goals of survival and improving quality of life, and willingness to accept treatment risks provided that there is close communication with providers. Patient representatives shared patients' priorities and insight at the Voting Panel meeting, influencing multiple guideline recommendations. CONCLUSION: Patient engagement fosters a holistic approach to CPG development, leading to recommendations aiming for the best clinical outcomes while prioritizing outcomes important for patients. The patient-identified themes played a critical role in ILD guideline development and provide core elements for shared decision-making as clinicians make management and therapeutic decisions with patients with SARD-associated ILD.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Racial variability in immune responses only partially explains differential systemic sclerosis disease severity.

OBJECTIVE: To understand if autoantibodies account for racial variation in disease severity, we compared autoantibody distribution and associated phenotype between self-identified black and white systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: 803 black and 2178 white SSc patients had systematic testing for autoantibodies using Euroimmun (centromere (ACA), RNA-polymerase III (POLR3), Scl70, PM/Scl, NOR90, Th/To, Ku, U3RNP and Ro52) and commercial ELISA (U1RNP). In this observational study, logistic regression was performed to assess the association between self-identified race and outcomes, adjusting for autoantibodies. To estimate whether the effect of race was mediated by autoantibody status, race coefficients from multivariate models including and excluding autoantibodies were compared. RESULTS: Anti-Scl70, anti-U1RNP, anti-U3RNP, anti-Th/To, anti-Ku and anti-NOR90 were more common in the black cohort than in the white cohort, which was enriched for ACA, anti-POLR3 and anti-PM/Scl. Black individuals had a higher prevalence of severe Raynaud's, skin, lung, gastrointestinal and renal disease whereas white individuals had a higher prevalence of severe heart and muscle disease. Adjusting for autoantibodies decreased the effect of race on outcome for telangiectasias, forced vital capacity <70%, pulmonary hypertension and severe lung, heart, muscle and gastrointestinal disease by 11%-44% and increased the association between race and renal crisis and severe kidney disease by 37%-52%. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest systematic analysis of autoantibody responses in a geographically diverse population of black SSc patients. Black and white individuals with SSc have distinct autoantibody profiles. Autoantibodies explain only a fraction of the effect of race on clinical outcomes, suggesting other factors contribute to disparate outcomes between these groups.

Are there more acute cardiac hospitalizations in winter in patients with systemic sclerosis? An analysis from the National Inpatient Sample.

Objective: Cold-induced transient myocardial ischemia has been described in patients with systemic sclerosis. The clinical impact of cold exposure in systemic sclerosis patients with acute cardiac conditions is unknown. We compared the seasonal variation of acute cardiac hospitalizations in patients with and without systemic sclerosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. The primary outcome was acute cardiac hospitalization primarily due to heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrhythmias. We compared the proportion of acute cardiac hospitalizations in each season in patients with and without systemic sclerosis. We also performed a subgroup analysis by US geographic region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West). Results: There were a total of 10,118,002 acute cardiac hospitalizations over the 4-year study period. Compared to those without systemic sclerosis, patients with systemic sclerosis who were hospitalized for acute cardiac care were younger (mean age 67 ± 13 vs 70 ± 14 years, p < 0.01), a greater proportion were female (82% vs 45%, p < 0.01), and a smaller proportion were Caucasian (68% vs 71%, p < 0.01). There was a lesser proportion of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in systemic sclerosis compared to non-systemic sclerosis patients. There was no significant difference in the proportion of winter admissions between systemic sclerosis and non-systemic sclerosis patients for total acute cardiac hospitalizations (26.4% vs 25.9%, p = 0.51), heart failure (27.0% vs 26.5%, p = 0.64), acute myocardial infarction (26.9% vs 25.5%, p = 0.50), or arrhythmias (24.3% vs 25.0%, p = 0.68). The results were consistent across all four US geographic regions. Conclusion: Our study did not support that patients with systemic sclerosis had a disproportionally higher risk of acute cardiac hospitalization in winter compared to the general population. We found that systemic sclerosis patients hospitalized for acute cardiac care had a lower burden of traditional cardiovascular risk factors than their non-systemic sclerosis counterparts.

Baseline absolute monocyte count predicts lung function decline among patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: A post hoc analysis from the focuSSced trial.

OBJECTIVE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in adults with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The identification of biomarkers to predict progression of SSc-ILD is an important unmet need. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an elevated baseline absolute monocyte count (AMC) is associated with a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) at 48 weeks among participants with SSc-ILD enrolled in the phase 3 focuSSced trial. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the focuSSced trial, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adults with diffuse cutaneous SSc for ≤ 60 months. Participants received subcutaneous tocilizumab 162 mg or placebo weekly for 48 weeks. We examined the relationship between baseline AMC and FVC at 48 weeks using a General Linear Model adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: The 136 participants with SSc-ILD in focuSSced were included in this study. Among participants assigned to the placebo group, there was a statistically significant inverse association between baseline AMC and change in FVC from baseline at week 48 in both unadjusted (ß coefficient -0.539, 95 % CI -1.032 to -0.047, p-value=0.032) and multivariable-adjusted (ß coefficient -0.573, 95 % CI -1.086 to -0.060, p-value=0.029) models. Among participants with SSc-ILD assigned to the tocilizumab group, there was no statistically significant association between baseline AMC and change in FVC from baseline at week 48 in unadjusted or fully adjusted models. CONCLUSION: AMC may be a biomarker of disease progression in SSc-ILD, especially in those with early SSc with elevated circulating inflammatory markers. These results should be validated in other SSc-ILD cohorts.

Guidelines toward more socially just mental health screening in schools.

Mental health screening is a pivotal practice for promoting the social-emotional-behavioral (SEB) health and well-being of youth in schools. However, some aspects of traditional mental health screening practices may inadvertently perpetuate structural racism and unintentionally facilitate oppression and SEB disparities. We address this issue constructively by presenting an intentional approach to guide school psychologists and related professionals in implementing more socially just mental health screening in schools. Our guidelines are grounded within the four phases of the Participatory Culture-Specific Intervention Modeling (PCSIM) framework: system entry, culture-specific model development, culture-specific program development, and program continuation or extension. We propose that conceptualizing mental health screening within PCSIM methodology promotes more socially just practices by (a) displacing the implicit power of professionals, (b) giving transparent representation to local communities, and (c) employing methods that are recursive, culturally relevant, and intended to build capacity for sustained transformative change. Within each PCSIM phase, we recommend culturally responsive practices for professionals that foster equity in screening and SEB outcomes and discuss ways to resist practices that perpetuate oppression and disparities. We aim to convey a method for mental health screening that is not done to students and schools but rather done in partnership with and for the benefit of students and schools. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary hypertension: A comprehensive review.

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) can be associated with various forms of pulmonary hypertension, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, pulmonary venous hypertension, interstitial lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and sometimes a combination of several processes. The prevalence of PAH varies among the different CTDs, with systemic sclerosis (SSc) having the highest at 8%-12%. The most recent European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend routine annual screening for PAH in SSc and CTDs with SSc features. As CTDs can be associated with a myriad of presentations of pulmonary hypertension, a thorough evaluation to include a right heart catheterization to clearly delineate the hemodynamic profile is essential in developing an appropriate treatment plan. Treatment strategies will depend on the predominant phenotype of pulmonary vasculopathy. In general, management approach to CTD-PAH mirrors that of idiopathic PAH. Despite this, outcomes of CTD-PAH are inferior to those of idiopathic PAH, with those of SSc-PAH being particularly poor. Reasons for this may include extrapulmonary manifestations of CTDs, including renal disease and gastrointestinal involvement, concurrent interstitial lung disease, and differences in the innate response of the right ventricle to increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Early referral for lung transplant evaluation of patients with CTD-PAH, particularly SSc-PAH, is recommended. It is hoped that in the near future, additional therapies may be added to the armamentarium of effective treatments for CTD-PAH. Ultimately, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of CTD-PAH will be required to develop targeted therapies for this morbid condition.

Impact of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease on healthcare use: association between fvc decline and inpatient hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Many types of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may transition to progressive chronic-fibrosing ILDs with rapid lung function decline and a negative survival prognosis. In real-world clinical settings, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures demonstrating progressive decline may be linked to negative outcomes, including increased risks of costly healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Thus, we assessed the relationship between rate of decline in lung function and an increase in HRU, specifically inpatient hospitalization, among patients with chronic fibrosing ILD. METHODS: This study utilized electronic health records from 01-Oct-2015 to 31-Oct-2019. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) had ≥ 2 fibrosing ILD diagnosis codes, clinical activity for ≥ 15 months, and ≥ 2 FVC tests occurring 6 months apart. Patients with missing demographic data, IPF, or use of nintedanib or pirfenidone were excluded. Two groups were defined by relative change in percent of predicted FVC (FVC% pred) from baseline to 6 months: significant decline (≥ 10%) vs. marginal decline/stable FVC (decrease < 10% or increase). The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of an inpatient hospitalization 6 months after the first FVC value. Descriptive and multivariable analysis was conducted to examine the impact of FVC decline on occurrence of inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: The sample included 566 patients: 13% (n = 75) with significant decline and 87% (n = 491) with marginal decline/stable FVC; their mean age (SD) was 65 (13.7) years and 56% were female. Autoimmune diagnoses were observed among 40% of patients with significant decline, and 27% with marginal decline/stable FVC. The significant decline group had better lung function at baseline than the marginal/stable group. For patients with FVC% <80% at baseline, reduction of FVC% ≥10% was associated with significantly increased odds of an inpatient hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; confidence interval [CI] 1.17, 6.94 [p = 0.021]). CONCLUSION: Decline in FVC% ≥10% was associated with increased odds of inpatient hospitalization among patients with reduced lung function at baseline. These findings support the importance of preserving lung function among patients with fibrosing ILD.

Performance of GAP and ILD-GAP models in predicting lung transplant or death in interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of two risk prediction models in interstitial lung disease (ILD) to predict death or lung transplantation in a cohort of patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with IPAF at an academic medical center. The primary outcome was a composite of lung transplantation or death. We applied the patient data to the previously described GAP and ILD-GAP models to determine the ability of these models to predict the composite outcome. Model discrimination was assessed using the c-index, and model calibration was determined by comparing the incidence ratios of observed versus expected deaths. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients with IPAF were included. Mean (standard deviation) age was 58 (13.5) years and the majority were female (62%). The majority met serologic and morphologic criteria for IPAF (94% and 91%, respectively). The GAP model had a c-index of 0.664 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.547-0.781), while the ILD-GAP model had a c-index of 0.569 (95% CI 0.440-0.697). In those with GAP stage 1 or GAP stage 2 disease, calibration of the GAP model was satisfactory at 2 and 3 years for the cumulative end point of lung transplantation or death. CONCLUSION: In patients with IPAF, the GAP model performed well as a predictor of lung transplantation or death at 2 years and 3 years from ILD diagnosis in patients with GAP stage 1 and GAP stage 2 disease.

The Collaborative National Quality and Efficacy Registry for Scleroderma: association of medication use on gastrointestinal tract symptoms in early disease and the importance of tobacco cessation.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is frequently associated with gastrointestinal tract (GIT) involvement. The Collaborative National Quality and Efficacy Registry (CONQUER) is a US-based collaborative study collecting longitudinal follow up data on SSc patients with less than 5-years disease duration enrolled at Scleroderma centres of excellence. This manuscript presents the GIT natural history and outcomes in relation to other scleroderma manifestations and medication exposures. METHODS: CONQUER participants that had completed a minimum of two serial Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium GIT Questionnaires (GIT 2.0) were included in this analysis. Patients were categorised by total GIT 2.0 severity at baseline, and by category change: none-to-mild (0.49); moderate (0.50-1.00), and severe-to-very severe (1.01-3.00) at the subsequent visit. Based on this data, four groups were identified: none-to-mild with no change, moderate-to-severe with no change, improvement, or worsening. Clinical features and medications, categorised as gastrointestinal tract targeted therapy, anti-fibrotic, immunosuppression, or immunomodulatory drugs, were recorded. Analysis included a proportional odds modelaccounting for linear and mixed effects of described variables. RESULTS: 415 enrolled CONQUER participants met project inclusion criteria. Most participants had stable mild GIT symptoms at baseline and were on immunomodulatory and anti-reflux therapy. In most patients, anti-reflux medication and immunosuppression initiation preceded the baseline visit, whereas anti-fibrotic initiation occurred at or after the baseline visit. In the proportional odds model, worsening GIT score at the follow-up visit was associated with current tobacco use (odds ratio: 3.48 (1.22, 9.98, p 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: This report from the CONQUER cohort, suggests that most patients with early SSc have stable and mild GIT disease. Closer follow-up was associated with milder, stable GIT symptoms. There was no clear association between immunosuppression or anti-fibrotic use and severity of GIT symptoms. However, active tobacco use was associated with worse GIT symptoms, highlighting the importance of smoking cessation counselling in this population.

Prognostic significance of pericardial effusion in systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: analysis from the PHAROS Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of pericardial effusion in patients with SSc-PH. METHODS: Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma (PHAROS) is a prospective multicentre registry which enrolled patients with newly diagnosed SSc-PH from 2005 to 2016. The prognostic impact of pericardial effusion status, including those who ever or never had pericardial effusion, and those who had persistent or intermittent pericardial effusion, was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were performed. RESULTS: Of the 335 patients with SSc-PH diagnosed by right heart catheterization and documentation of pericardial effusion presence or absence on echocardiogram, 166 (50%) ever had pericardial effusion. Ever having pericardial effusion was not predictive of survival (Log-rank test p= 0.49). Of the 245 SSc-PH patients who had at least two echocardiograms, 44% had a change in pericardial effusion status over an average of 4.3 years of follow up. Having a persistent pericardial effusion was an independent predictor of survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.34, 95% CI 1.20-4.64, p= 0.002), while intermittent pericardial effusion was not a predictor of survival (aHR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.52-1.56, p= 0.68), in a multivariable-adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: Persistent pericardial effusion, but not ever having had pericardial effusion or intermittent pericardial effusion, was independently associated with poorer survival. Incorporating information from serial echocardiograms may help clinicians better prognosticate survival in their SSc-PH patients.

Incidence of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: The MESA Lung Study.

The incidence of newly developed interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and fibrotic ILA have not been previously reported.Trained thoracic radiologists evaluated 13 944 cardiac CT scans for the presence of ILA in 6197 Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis longitudinal cohort study participants >45 years of age from 2000 to 2012. 5% of the scans were re-read by the same or a different observer in a blinded fashion. After exclusion of participants with ILA at baseline, incidence rates and incidence rate ratios for ILA and fibrotic ILA were calculated.The intra-reader agreement of ILA was 92.0% (Gwet AC1=0.912, ICC=0.982) and the inter-reader agreement of ILA was 83.5% (Gwet AC1=0.814; ICC=0.969). Incidence of ILA and fibrotic ILA was estimated to be 13.1 cases/1000 person-years and 3.5/1000 person-years, respectively. In multivariable analyses, age (HR 1.06 (1.05, 1.08), p <0.001; HR 1.08 (1.06, 1.11), p <0.001), high attenuation area (HAA) at baseline (HR 1.05 (1.03, 1.07), p <0.001; HR 1.06 (1.02, 1.10), p=0.002), and the MUC5B promoter SNP (HR 1.73 (1.17, 2.56) p=0.01; HR 4.96 (2.68, 9.15), p <0.001) were associated with incident ILA and fibrotic ILA, respectively. Ever smoking (HR 2.31 (1.34, 3.96), p= 0.002) and an IPF polygenic risk score (HR 2.09 (1.61-2.71), p<0.001) were associated only with incident fibrotic ILA.Incident ILA and fibrotic ILA were estimated by review of cardiac imaging studies. These findings may lead to wider application of a screening tool for atherosclerosis to identify preclinical lung disease.

CONQUER Scleroderma: association of gastrointestinal tract symptoms in early disease with resource utilization.

OBJECTIVES: SSc is associated with increased health-care resource utilization and economic burden. The Collaborative National Quality and Efficacy Registry (CONQUER) is a US-based collaborative that collects longitudinal follow-up data on SSc patients with <5 years of disease duration enrolled at scleroderma centres in the USA. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between gastrointestinal tract symptoms and self-reported resource utilization in CONQUER participants. METHODS: CONQUER participants who had completed a baseline and 12-month Gastrointestinal Tract Questionnaire (GIT 2.0) and a Resource Utilization Questionnaire (RUQ) were included in this analysis. Patients were categorized by total GIT 2.0 severity: none-to-mild (0-0.49); moderate (0.50-1.00), and severe-to-very severe (1.01-3.00). Clinical features and medication exposures were examined in each of these categories. The 12-month RUQ responses were summarized by GIT 2.0 score categories at 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 211 CONQUER participants who met the inclusion criteria, most (64%) had mild GIT symptoms, 26% had moderate symptoms, and 10% severe GIT symptoms at 12 months. The categorization of GIT total severity score by RUQ showed that more upper endoscopy procedures and inpatient hospitalization occurred in the CONQUER participants with severe GIT symptoms. These patients with severe GIT symptoms also reported the use of more adaptive equipment. CONCLUSION: This report from the CONQUER cohort suggests that severe GIT symptoms result in more resource utilization. It is especially important to understand resource utilization in early disease cohorts when disease activity, rather than damage, primarily contributes to health-related costs of SSc.