Impact of Preoperative Extramammary Findings in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast MRI has been associated with significant rates of false positive findings. We aimed to determine the frequency of extramammary findings (EMFs) in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients on breast MRI with contrast and assess the significance of these findings and need for additional imaging and follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with breast cancer from October 2018 to October 2019 was performed. Clinicopathologic features were collected, including type of breast cancer, size, stage, and whether the patients had a breast MRI. Those who had MRI were included, and the MRI was reviewed to determine if EMFs were identified. Further imaging and follow-up were assessed and recorded. RESULTS: Of the 480 patients included in this cohort, 353 (74%) had invasive cancer, and the remainder had ductal carcinoma in situ. Two hundred ninety patients (60%) underwent MRI, and 53 of 290 (18%) had EMFs on MRI. Of these, 28 of 53 (53%) underwent additional imaging to further evaluate findings. Two invasive procedures were performed (fine needle aspiration and thymectomy), and 1 malignancy was identified in the thymus. No metastatic breast cancer was identified in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: MRIs are frequently obtained for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, and additional findings, especially extramammary, can be stressful for patients, and potentially lead to treatment delay if further evaluation is warranted. Our results demonstrate that incidental EMFs discovered via breast MRI are common and often lead to additional imaging studies. However, no metastatic lesions were found, and only 1 separate malignancy was identified, which did not affect breast cancer management. In patients with early-stage breast cancer, EMFs yield a very low rate of malignancy, providing high levels of reassurance and supporting the option of proceeding with surgery or treatment without delay.

Impact of Adenotonsillectomy on Homework Performance in Children With Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing.

OBJECTIVE: As a first line treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), adenotonsillectomy (AT) has been shown to confer physiologic and neurocognitive benefits to a child. However, there is a scarcity of data on how homework performance is affected postoperatively. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of AT on homework performance in children with SDB. METHODS: Children in grades 1 to 8 undergoing AT for SDB based on clinical criteria with or without preoperative polysomnography along with a control group of children undergoing surgery unrelated to the treatment of SDB were recruited. The primary outcome of interest was the differential change in homework performance between the study group and control at follow-up as measured by the validated Homework Performance Questionnaire (HPQ-P). Adjustments were made for demographics and Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) scores. RESULTS: 116 AT and 47 control subjects were recruited, and follow-up data was obtained in 99 AT and 35 control subjects. There were no significant differences between the general (total) HPQ-P scores and subscale scores between the AT and control subjects at entry and there were no significant differences in the change scores (follow-up minus initial scores) between the groups. Regression modeling also demonstrated that there were no group (AT vs control) by time interactions that predicted differential improvements in the HPQ-P (P > .10 for each model) although initial PSQ score was a significant predictor of lower HPQ-P scores for all models. CONCLUSIONS: Children with SDB experienced improvement in HPQ-P scores postoperatively, but the degree of change was not significant when compared to controls. Further studies incorporating additional educational metrics are encouraged to assess the true scholastic impact of AT in children with SDB.

Relation of mucous membrane alterations to oral intake during the first year after treatment for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Acute oral mucositis is associated with pain and impaired swallowing. Little information is available on the effects of chronic mucositis on swallowing. METHODS: Sixty patients treated for cancer of the head and neck were examined during the first year after their cancer treatment. Oral mucosa was rated with the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale. Stimulated whole-mouth saliva, oral pain rating, percent of oral intake, and 2 subscales of the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck (PSS-HN) cancer were also collected. RESULTS: Mucositis scores and pain ratings decreased over time while functional measures of eating improved over time. Reduction in chronic mucositis was correlated with improved oral intake and diet. CONCLUSION: Lack of association with pain was attributed to the absence of ulcerations. Continued impairment of oral intake during the first year posttreatment may be related to oral mucosal changes and other factors.

What information do clinicians use in recommending oral versus nonoral feeding in oropharyngeal dysphagic patients?

There is little evidence regarding the type(s) of information clinicians use to make the recommendation for oral or nonoral feeding in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. This study represents a first step toward identifying data used by clinicians to make this recommendation and how clinical experience may affect the recommendation. Thirteen variables were considered critical in making the oral vs. nonoral decision by the 23 clinicians working in dysphagia. These variables were then used by the clinicians to independently recommend oral vs. nonoral feeding or partial oral with nonoral feeding for the 20 anonymous patients whose modified barium swallows were sent on a videotape to each clinician. Clinicians also received data on the 13 variables for each patient. Results of clinician agreement on the recommendation of full oral and nonoral only were quite high, as measured by Kappa statistics. In an analysis of which of the 13 criteria clinicians used in making their recommendations, amount of aspiration was the criterion with the highest frequency. Recommendations for use of postures and maneuvers and the effect of clinician experience on these choices were also analyzed.

Functional reorganization and recovery after constraint-induced movement therapy in subacute stroke: case reports.

Preliminary assessments of the feasibility, safety, and effects on neuronal reorganization measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) of the upper extremity were made in eight cases of subacute stroke. Within fourteen days of their stroke, patients were randomly assigned to two weeks of CIMT or traditional therapy. Baseline motor performance and cortical/subcortical representation for movement with TMS were assessed before treatment. Post-treatment assessments were made at the end of treatment and at three months after the stroke. The TMS mapping showed a larger motor representation in the lesioned hemisphere of the CIMT patients as compared to the controls at the three-month follow-up assessment. The enlarged motor representation in the lesioned hemisphere for hand movement correlated with improved motor function of the affected hand, suggesting a link between movement representation size as measured with TMS and functionality. These results suggest that TMS can be safely and effectively used to assess brain function in subacute stroke and further suggest that CIMT may enhance cortical/subcortical motor reorganization and accelerate motor recovery when started within the first two weeks after stroke.