Home blood pressure monitoring and e-Health: investigation of patients' experience with the Hy-Result system.

BACKGROUND: Hy-Result is a validated system designed to help patients complying with the home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) protocol and understanding their blood pressure (BP) readings. It is available as a standalone web application or within a wireless BP monitor app. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore patients' experience with Hy-Result. METHODS: Online survey completed by 512 users of the Hy-Result web application or monitor app, and three focus groups with 24 hypertensive patients who monitor their BP at home and use the Hy-Result web application to record their data. We assessed the experience of patients with the functionalities and medical content of Hy-Result, their feelings and expectations, and the impact of Hy-Result on the physician-patient relationship. RESULTS: (1) Functionalities: Over 90% of survey respondents and all focus group participants found Hy-Result easy to use. The main drawback of the web application is the need to manually enter all BP values at once. (2) Medical content: Hy-Result offers information on arterial hypertension and HBPM that most patients found useful. Users found that Hy-Result triggers appropriate reactions to BP readings, including adequately timed general practitioner visits. (3) Feelings and expectations: Over 90% of survey respondents trust Hy-Result and focus group participants understood that text messages are suggestions, not diagnoses. Hy-Result did not cause anxiety or excessive BP measurements. (4) Physician-patient relationship: Three-quarter of survey respondents agreed that Hy-Result may help when talking with their doctor about their BP values but only one-third of those have shown the report to their physician. For focus group participants, using Hy-Result should ideally be a physician prescription. They were aware that Hy-Result does not replace clinical judgment and that physicians still have a decisive role in BP management. CONCLUSION: Most of the users described Hy-Result as an easy-to-use and useful tool. Patients are willing to use it on physician request.

Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided definition of adherence profiles in resistant hypertension and identification of predictors of poor adherence.

AIMS: Arterial hypertension is an important cardiovascular risk factor. A substantial proportion of patients show resistance to antihypertensive treatment but poor adherence to medication regimens is also a significant cause of treatment failure. In this context, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be useful. The objective of this study was to assess adherence to treatment in patients with resistant hypertension by TDM and to identify parameters that predict nonadherence. METHODS: Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantify a wide panel of antihypertensive drugs in human plasma to assess treatment compliance. Associations between TDM-determined adherence profiles, self-reported adherence and other patient-related clinical, anthropometric or demographic features were evaluated as potentially useful pre-TDM predictors of poor adherence. RESULTS: TDM was performed on 50 patients with suspected resistant hypertension: 24% of patients partially complied to treatment and 18% were nonadherent. No concordance was observed with questionnaire results, while nonadherence was associated with high diastolic blood pressure, high heart rate, previous onset of stroke and previous use of invasive treatments, including renal denervation or baroreceptor stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence highlights the high prevalence of poor adherence in patients with resistant hypertension and the need for caution in using invasive approaches. These preliminary data require validation in a larger cohort, to confirm the need for TDM in routine clinical practice.

Impact of psychological profile on drug adherence and drug resistance in patients with apparently treatment-resistant hypertension.

PURPOSE: Patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (a-TRH) are often poorly adherent to drug treatment and have an unusual personal history and psychological profile. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of drug adherence and drug resistance in a cohort of patients with aTRH, with emphasis on psychological characteristics. METHODS: All patients with confirmed aTRH on standardized antihypertensive treatment were eligible. Drug adherence was assessed by drug dosages in urine using Liquid Chromatography coupled with tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Drug resistance was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure adjusted for the number of antihypertensive drugs and for drug adherence. Psychological profile was assessed using a broad array of validated questionnaires. RESULTS: The analysis included 35 consecutive patients. The proportion of adherent, partly adherent and totally non-adherent patients was 29, 40 and 31%, respectively. In regression analysis, independent predictors of poor drug adherence were recent hospital admission for hypertension, a lower ability to put things into perspective when facing negative events and a higher tendency to somatize, accounting for 51% of variability in drug adherence. Independent predictors of treatment resistance were a higher recourse to the strategies of blaming others and oneself, accounting for 37% of variability in drug treatment resistance. CONCLUSION: In patients with aTRH, poor adherence is frequent but does not entirely account for treatment resistance. Psychological characteristics appear as strong predictors of both drug adherence and drug resistance. Our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring and psychological evaluation should be an integral part of assessment of patients with aTRH.

Effectiveness of Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Controlled Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Early uncontrolled studies reported large blood pressure reductions in subjects with resistant hypertension treated with renal denervation, however these results were not confirmed in several of the latest publications. AIM: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of RDN in controlled studies comparing RDN to either a sham procedure or to medical therapy. METHOD: Only controlled studies were included in the analysis. Both the unadjusted and control-adjusted BP changes were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 11 publications of which only 3 were double-blinded RCTs with a sham control, while 8 were open label studies where the control group was treated with medical therapy. Only 2 studies assessed adherence to medical therapy with robust methodologies. Office BP reduction (- 18/8 mmHg) significantly overestimated ABPM change (- 9/- 5 mmHg), with high heterogeneity between the included studies. When the treatment effect was adjusted for the BP change in the control group, BP changes became non significant (ABPM: - 1.8 for systolic BP [95% CI - 4.5 to 0.9] and - 0.6 for diastolic BP [95% CI - 2.3 to 1.2]). These results were confirmed when only the sham-controlled studies were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of promising results in early reports, renal denervation fails to show superiority to a sham procedure or to medical therapy in recently published controlled studies. Lack of a sham control in most publications and heterogeneity in assessment of treatment adherence may account for part the variability reported in the studies. Renal denervation fails to show superiority to a sham procedure or to medical therapy in recently published controlled studies.

Blood pressure response to renal denervation is correlated with baseline blood pressure variability: a patient-level meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sympathetic tone is one of the main determinants of blood pressure (BP) variability and treatment-resistant hypertension. The aim of our study was to assess changes in BP variability after renal denervation (RDN). In addition, on an exploratory basis, we investigated whether baseline BP variability predicted the BP changes after RDN. METHODS: We analyzed 24-h BP recordings obtained at baseline and 6 months after RDN in 167 treatment-resistant hypertension patients (40% women; age, 56.7 years; mean 24-h BP, 152/90 mmHg) recruited at 11 expert centers. BP variability was assessed by weighted SD [SD over time weighted for the time interval between consecutive readings (SDiw)], average real variability (ARV), coefficient of variation, and variability independent of the mean (VIM). RESULTS: Mean office and 24-h BP fell by 15.4/6.6 and 5.5/3.7 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, systolic/diastolic SDiw and VIM for 24-h SBP/DBP decreased by 1.18/0.63 mmHg (P ≤ 0.01) and 0.86/0.42 mmHg (P ≤ 0.05), respectively, whereas no significant changes in ARV or coefficient of variation occurred. Furthermore, baseline SDiw (P = 0.0006), ARV (P = 0.01), and VIM (P = 0.04) predicted the decrease in 24-h DBP but not 24-h SBP after RDN. CONCLUSION: RDN was associated with a decrease in BP variability independent of the BP level, suggesting that responders may derive benefits from the reduction in BP variability as well. Furthermore, baseline DBP variability estimates significantly correlated with mean DBP decrease after RDN. If confirmed in younger patients with less arterial damage, in the absence of the confounding effect of drugs and drug adherence, baseline BP variability may prove a good predictor of BP response to RDN.

Procedural Reassessment of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertensive Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Recent anatomical and clinical studies have led to the hypothesis that in several cases of failure of response to renal denervation (RDN), the procedure has not been technically correct. AIM: To perform procedural reassessment in patients with true resistant hypertension who underwent RDN. METHODS: We retrospectively reassessed the procedural technique of RDN in 10 true resistant hypertensive patients, comparing the sites of renal ablations with the knowledge of animal and human post mortem evidences. Procedural ablation technique was assessed in terms of number of ablations for each renal artery and site of ablation (quadrant and distance from renal ostium) by using the radiologic images of each RDN and the number of radiofrequency ablation attempts documented in the reports of each denervation session. RESULTS: 10 patients were studied, 9 denervated with Simplicity monoelectrode catheter, 1 with multielectrode balloon technique. Responders to the procedure underwent more ablations and particularly at least a quadrant ablation in one of the kidney arteries, >2 ablations in Dorsal plus Ventral quadrants and in 67% of then >10 ablations were done in superior inferior and ventral quadrants. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of a well knowledge of renal artery anatomy and underlines the relevance of the choice of ablation sites in order to obtain a successful RDN procedure.

Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: Stent It or Not?

After three large neutral trials in which renal artery revascularization failed to reduce cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality, renal artery stenting became a therapeutic taboo. However, this is probably unjustified as these trials have important limitations and excluded patients most likely to benefit from revascularization. In particular, patients with severe hypertension were often excluded and resistant hypertension was either poorly described or not conform to the current definition. Effective pharmacological combination treatment can control blood pressure in most patients with renovascular hypertension. However, it may also induce further renal hypoperfusion and thus accelerate progressive loss of renal tissue. Furthermore, case reports of patients with resistant hypertension showing substantial blood pressure improvement after successful revascularization are published over again. To identify those patients who would definitely respond to renal artery stenting, properly designed randomized clinical trials are definitely needed.

Evaluation of a short home blood pressure measurement in an outpatient population of hypertensives.

Current guidelines suggest the use of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) as a method complementary to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the identification of arterial hypertension. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a short HBPM schedule compared with ABPM, and to evaluate to what extent HBPM can replace ABPM. A total of 310 patients who performed ABPM in our hypertension clinic were enrolled between November 2011 and June 2015. They performed a 4-day HBPM schedule, with two readings in the morning and two readings at night. Results showed a moderate correlation between HBPM and ABPM (r = 0.59 for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and r = 0.72 for diastolic blood pressure (DBP)) and moderate diagnostic agreement (area under curve: 0.791 for SBP and 0.857 for DBP). No significant difference was found between first-day average and those of days 2-4. Diagnostic agreement between the two techniques was moderate, supporting the notion that HBPM cannot replace ABPM in the general population. However, we identified two HBPM thresholds, 123/75 and 144/87 mm Hg, through which subjects who may not require further ABPM can be identified.

Effectiveness of blood pressure educational and evaluation program for the improvement of measurement accuracy among nurses.

AIM: To assess the procedure for measuring blood pressure (BP) among hospital nurses and to assess if a training program would improve technique and accuracy. METHODS: 160 nurses from Molinette Hospital were included in the study. The program was based upon theoretical and practical lessons. It was one day long and it was held by trained nurses and physicians who have practice in the Hypertension Unit. An evaluation of nurses' measuring technique and accuracy was performed before and after the program, by using a 9-item checklist. Moreover we calculated the differences between measured and effective BP values before and after the training program. RESULTS: At baseline evaluation, we observed inadequate performance on some points of clinical BP measurement technique, specifically: only 10% of nurses inspected the arm diameter before placing the cuff, 4% measured BP in both arms, 80% placed the head of the stethoscope under the cuff, 43% did not remove all clothing that covered the location of cuff placement, did not have the patient seat comfortably with his legs uncrossed and with his back and arms supported. After the training we found a significant improvement in the technique for all items. We didn't observe any significant difference of measurement knowledge between nurses working in different settings such as medical or surgical departments. CONCLUSIONS: Periodical education in BP measurement may be required, and this may significantly improve the technique and consequently the accuracy.

Silent cerebrovascular damage and its early correlates in essential hypertensive patients.

This study tested the association between cognitive functions, cerebrovascular damage, and cerebrovascular reactivity in 71 essential young hypertensives (age matched) and 22 normotensives (age matched). They underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, neurocognitive tests, cerebral magnetic resonance, and transcranial Doppler. Twenty-three percent of patients showed more than 10 white matter lesions and 8% showed none. No control subjects showed more than 10 white matter lesions and 90% of normal controls showed no lesions. Patients with more than 10 white matter alterations had longer hypertensive story and showed significant lower nocturnal blood pressure fall. Pulsatility index was correlated with the number of white matter lesions.