Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Brachytherapy ; 13(3): 250-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613132

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the introduction of inverse planning optimization for a two clinical target volume (CTV) concept in the online planning technique of temporary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume constraints were defined delivering a prescription dose of 8.5Gy for CTV1 (whole prostate) and 15Gy for CTV2 (peripheral zone). A total of 38 implants of 20 patients were inversely planned using the constraints and dose indices (D90 CTV1,2; V200 CTV1,2; D2 cc rectum; D0.1 cc urethra; dose nonhomogeneity ratio; and conformal index) compared against those derived from conventional planning (CP). RESULTS: The inversely planned (IP) treatment plans showed similar target volume coverage than by CP. The value of D90 CTV1 for CP was 5.62Gy and 5.63Gy for IPs. For CTV2, the D90 was also similar between both methods: 11.03Gy and 10.89Gy, respectively. Only V200 CTV2 was found to be significantly lower for CP than for IP: 5.76% vs. 8.14% (p<0.01). Values for D0.1 cc urethra were found to be: 9.57Gy and 9.02Gy, respectively. Rectal dosimetry: D2 cc Rectum was quite stable with 6.04Gy and 6.12Gy for CP and IP, respectively. The conformal index and dose nonhomogeneity ratio values for CTV1 and CTV2 for both planning types were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: After defining an objective second target volume CTV2 and introducing adequate IP constraints to the treatment planning system, clinically applicable treatment plans could be created by an IP approach. They feature user independency, time saving, and good preservation of the OARs.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Radiometria , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Uretra/efeitos da radiação
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 62(5): 1322-31, 2005 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16029788

RESUMO

PURPOSE: High-dose radiotherapy, delivered in an accelerated hypofractionated course, was utilized to treat prostate cancer. Therapy consisted of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided conformally modulated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is (1) to assess long-term comparative outcomes from three trials using similar accelerated hypofractionated regimes; and (2) to examine the long-term survival impact of a short course of < or =6 months adjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation when a very high radiation dose was delivered. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 2000, 1,260 patients were treated at three institutions with pelvic EBRT (36-50 Gy) integrated with HDR prostate brachytherapy. The total dose including brachytherapy was given over 5 weeks. The biologic equivalent EBRT dose ranged between 90 and 123 Gy (median, 102 Gy) using an alpha /beta of 1.2. Patient eligibility criteria included a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or =10, Gleason score > or =7, or clinical stage > or =T2b. A total of 1,260 patients were treated, and 934 meet the criteria. Kiel University Hospital treated 198 patients; William Beaumont Hospital, 315; and California Endocurietherapy Cancer Center, 459 patients. Brachytherapy dose regimes were somewhat different between centers and the dose was escalated from 5.5 x 3 to 15 Gy x 2 Gy. Patients were divided for analysis between the 406 who received up to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and the 528 patients who did not. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 18 months (3 times the exposure to androgen deprivation therapy). The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology biochemical failure definition was used. RESULTS: Mean age was 69 years. Median follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 1.5-14.5); 4 years for androgen deprivation therapy patients and 4.9 for radiation alone. There was no difference at 5 and 8 years in overall survival, cause-specific survival, or biochemical control among the three institutions. The corresponding 8-year rates with and without androgen deprivation therapy were biochemical control 85% and 81%; overall survival 83% and 78%; cause-specific survival 89% and 94%; and metastatic rates of 16.6% and 7.3%. A multivariate analysis revealed androgen deprivation therapy did not predict for biochemical failure for either the entire group or the subset of 177 patients harboring all three poor prognostic factors. Moreover, adding androgen deprivation therapy strongly correlated with higher rates of both metastasis (p = 0.09; hazard ratio, 2.08) and cancer-related deaths (p = 0.02, hazard ratio 3.25). These negative results for the most unfavorable group led us to question if androgen deprivation therapy might have a deleterious impact through delay in delivery of the potentially curative radiation or whether there may be a biologic basis by fixing the cycling cells in G0. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated pelvic EBRT integrated with TRUS-guided conformally modulated HDR administered to 1,260 patients in three institutions was an excellent method of delivering very high radiation dose to the prostate in 5 weeks. Similar high overall, cause-specific, and biochemical no evidence of disease survival rates achieved show that prostate HDR can be successfully delivered in academic and community settings. At 8 years, the addition of a course of < or =6 months of neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy to a very high radiation dose did not confer a therapeutic advantage but added side effects and cost. Furthermore, for the most unfavorable group, there was a higher rate of distant metastasis and more prostate cancer-related deaths. We question the value of a short course of androgen deprivation therapy when used with high-dose radiation.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Braquiterapia/métodos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 74(2): 137-48, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15734201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this paper is to present the GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations for template and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided transperineal temporary interstitial prostate brachytherapy using a high dose rate iridium-192 stepping source and a remote afterloading technique. Experts in prostate brachytherapy developed these recommendations on behalf of the GEC/ESTRO and of the EAU. The paper has been approved by both GEC/ESTRO steering committee members and EAU committee members. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Interstitial brachytherapy (BT) to organ confined prostate cancer can be applied as a boost treatment in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) using a proper number of BT fractions in curative intent. Temporary transperineal BT alone or in combination with EBRT are feasible as a palliative/salvage treatment modality because of local recurrence, however, without large clinical experience. The use of temporary BT as a monotherapy is subject of ongoing clinical research. RESULTS: Recommendations for pre-treatment investigations, patient selection, equipment and facilities, the clinical team, the implant procedure (treatment planning and needle implantation) dose and fractionation, reporting, management of side effects and follow-up are given. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to be technically and advisory in nature, but the ultimate responsibility for the medical decision rests with the treating physician. Although, this paper represents the consensus of an interdisciplinary group of experts, TRUS and template guided temporary transperineal interstitial implants in prostate cancer are a constantly evolving field and the recommendations are subject to modifications as new data become available.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioisótopos de Irídio/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Contraindicações , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Seleção de Pacientes , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Reto/diagnóstico por imagem , Terapia de Salvação , Ultrassonografia
4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 52(1): 81-90, 2002 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11777625

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the 8-year outcome of local dose escalation using high-dose-rate conformal brachytherapy combined with elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred forty-four consecutively treated men (1986-1992) were recorded prospectively. Twenty-nine (20.14%) patients had T1b-2a tumors, and 115 (79.86%) patients had T2b-3 tumors according to, respectively, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer 1992. All patients had a negative nodal status, proven by CT or MRI. The mean initial PSA value was 25.61 ng/mL (Initial value for 41.66% of patients was <10 ng/mL, for 21.52% was 10-20 ng/mL, and for 32.63% was >20 ng/mL). The total dose applied by external beam radiotherapy was 50 Gy in the pelvis and 40 Gy in the prostate. The high-dose-rate brachytherapy was delivered in two fractions, which were incorporated into the external beam treatment (after 20-Gy and 40-Gy external beam radiotherapy dose). The dose per fraction was 15 Gy for the PTV1 (peripheral prostate zone) and 9 Gy for the PTV2 (entire prostatic gland). Any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed bNED. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan-Meier and compared using the log-rank. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors of the various measures of outcome. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 8 years (range 60-171 months). The overall survival rate was 71.5%, and the disease-free survival rate was 82.6%. The bNED survival rate was 72.9%. Freedom from local recurrence for T3 stage was 91.3%, whereas for G3 lesions it was 88.23%. Freedom from distant recurrence for T3 stage was 82.6% and for G3 lesions 70.59%. Univariate survival analyses revealed that low stage (T1-2), low grade (G1-2), no hormonal therapy, initial PSA value less than 40 ng/mL, and PSA normalization <1.0 ng/mL after irradiation were associated with long survival. In multivariate analyses, initial PSA value, PSA kinetics after radiation therapy, and no adjuvant hormonal treatment were independent prognostic factors. Grade 3 late radiation toxicity (according to RTOG/EORTC scoring scheme) was 2.3% for the genitourinary system in terms of cystitis and 4.10% for the gastrointestinal system in terms of proctitis. Grades 4 and 5 genitourinary/gastrointestinal morbidity was not observed. A history of transurethral resection of the prostate with a median interval of less than 6 months from radiotherapy was associated with a high risk of genitourinary toxicity. CONCLUSION: The 8-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of combined elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cure of localized and especially high-risk prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Irradiação Linfática/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Análise de Variância , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pelve , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA