Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to determine the agreement between pulmonary artery thermodilution (PA-TD), transpulmonary thermodilution (TP-TD) and the pulse contour method, and to test the ability of the pulse contour method to track changes in cardiac output. METHODS: Cardiac output was determined twice before cardiac surgery with both PA-TD and TP-TD. The precision (two standard deviations of the difference between repeated measurements) and agreement of the two methods were calculated. Post-operatively, cardiac output was determined with the PA-TD and pulse contour methods, and the bias and limits of agreement were again calculated. Finally, in patients with heart rates below 60 beats/min or a cardiac index of less than 2.5 l/min/m2, atrial pacing was started and the haemodynamic consequences were monitored with the PA-TD and pulse contour methods. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included. The precisions of PA-TD and TP-TD were 0.41 l/min [95% confidence interval (CI), +/- 0.07] and 0.48 l/min (95% CI, +/- 0.08), respectively. The bias and limits of agreement between PA-TD and TP-TD were - 0.46 l/min (95% CI, +/- 0.11) and +/- 1.10 l/min (95% CI, +/- 0.19), respectively. Post-operatively, the bias and limits of agreement between the PA-TD and pulse contour methods were 0.07 l/min and +/- 2.20 l/min, respectively. The changes in cardiac output with atrial pacing were in the same direction and of the same magnitude in 15 of the 16 patients. CONCLUSION: The precision of cardiac output measurements with PA-TD and TP-TD was very similar. The transpulmonary method, however, overestimated the cardiac output by 0.46 l/min. Post-operatively, cardiac output measurements with the PA-TD and pulse contour methods did not agree, but the pulse contour method reliably tracked pacing-induced changes in cardiac output.

Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not previously been determined. A priori we suspected that the precision would be lower in patients with AF than in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). Consequently, we also determined if the precision could be improved by injecting the thermal indicator into the right ventricle instead of the right atrium. METHODS: Cardiac output was determined as the average result of four injections of 10 ml of iced saline. Replicate measurements were performed with thermal indicator injections into the right atrium and ventricle. The coefficients of variation and the precisions were calculated. RESULTS: In the 25 patients with AF, mean cardiac output was 3.96 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.4), the coefficient of variation 0.073 (95% CI +/- 0.011), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14) with injection into the right atrium. In the 25 patients with SR, mean cardiac output was 4.73 l min(-1) (range 2.4-7.3), the coefficient of variation 0.047(95% CI +/- 0.006), and the precision 0.38 l min(-1) (95% CI +/- 0.14). In both groups, an agreement analysis demonstrated that the injection of indicator into the right ventricle resulted in a significantly higher cardiac output [AF+0.25 (95% CI +/- 0.15) l min(-1), SR+0.29 ( +/- 0.20) l min(-1)]. CONCLUSION: The coefficient of variation for cardiac output determinations is 55% higher in patients with AF. Two measurements, separated by time or intervention, must differ by 15% in AF patients and 9% in SR patients before one can be 95% confident that a real change has taken place.

Thermodilution cardiac output--are three injections enough?

BACKGROUND: Bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements have been a mainstay in clinical monitoring of critically ill patients for more than 30 years. Usually the results of an arbitrarily chosen number (1-6) of thermal indicator injections are averaged to increase the reliability of the measurement. The number of injections needed to achieve a given level of precision has, however, not previously been systematically investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 80 hemodynamically stable patients cardiac output was determined as the average of eight injections of 10 ml of iced saline. From the 638 measurements we examined the relationship between the number of thermal indicator injections and the precision of the resulting cardiac output estimate. Furthermore, the association between the number of injections and the least detectable difference among two sets of measurements was established. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that one needs to average the results of four injections to be 95% confident that the result is within 5% of the 'true' cardiac output and that two series of four measurements have to differ by at least 7% before one can be sure (95%) that a change in cardiac function has taken place.

The first intensive care unit in the world: Copenhagen 1953.

After an extensive survey of the medical literature we present compelling evidence that the first intensive care unit was established at Kommunehospitalet in Copenhagen in December 1953. The pioneer was the Danish anaesthetist Bjørn Ibsen. The many factors that interacted favourably in Copenhagen to promote the idea of intensive care therapy, half a century ago, are also described.

Thermodilution cardiac output. Cold vs room temperature injectate and the importance of measuring the injectate temperature in the right atrium.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of thermodilution cardiac output measurements with the more convenient room temperature thermal indicator instead of cold injectates has been repeatedly investigated. However, the issue has not been addressed with the appropriate statistical approach advocated by Altman and Bland. Furthermore, we wished to determine if the incorporation of a second thermistor in the thermodilution catheter, to measure the temperature of the thermal indicator where it is delivered into the right atrium/superior caval vein, would result in more precise cardiac output measurements. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized to receive a single or dual thermistor pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter. Cardiac output was calculated as the average of four injections of 10 ml of isotonic saline. Precision (2 x SD of differences in replicate measurements) for the two catheters and injectate temperatures, and bias and limits of agreement between measurements, with cold and room temperature injectates, were determined. RESULTS: Precision was (0 degrees C) 0.42 l/min and (20 degrees C) 0.90 l/min, and bias and limits of agreement -0.83 l/min and -1.93-0.27 l/min for the single thermistor catheter. For the dual thermistor system precision was (0 degrees C) 0.34 l/min and (20 degrees C) 0.58 l/min. Bias and limits of agreement were -0.03 l/min and -0.61-0.55 l/min. CONCLUSION: The second thermistor is redundant if cold injectates are used. If one wishes to use room temperature injectates the single thermistor system is inadequate. A dual thermistor catheter is, on the other hand, acceptable.