RESUMO
Enterococcus faecalis/faecium repeats (EFARs) are miniature insertion sequences spread in the genome of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Unit-length repeats measure 165-170 bp and contain two modules (B and T) capable of folding independently into stem-loop sequences, connected by a short, unstructured module J. The E. faecalis elements feature only one type of B, J and T modules. In contrast, the E. faecium elements result from the assembly of different types of B, J and T modules, and may vary in length because they carry multiple B modules. Most EFARs are located close (0-20 bp) to ORF stop codons, and are thus cotranscribed with upstream flanking genes. In both E. faecalis and E. faecium cells, EFAR transcripts accumulate in a strand-dependent fashion. Data suggest that T modules function as bidirectional transcriptional terminators, which provide a 3'-end to gene transcripts spanning B modules, while blocking antisense transcripts coming in from the opposite direction.
Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano/genética , Enterococcus faecalis/genética , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Sequências Repetidas Invertidas , Sequência de Bases , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Alinhamento de SequênciaRESUMO
The structural organization of Enterococcus faecalis repeats (EFAR) is described, palindromic DNA sequences identified in the genome of the Enterococcus faecalis V583 strain by in silico analyses. EFAR are a novel type of miniature insertion sequences, which vary in size from 42 to 650 bp. Length heterogeneity results from the variable assembly of 16 different sequence types. Most elements measure 170 bp, and can fold into peculiar L-shaped structures resulting from the folding of two independent stem-loop structures (SLSs). Homologous chromosomal regions lacking or containing EFAR sequences were identified by PCR among 20 E. faecalis clinical isolates of different genotypes. Sequencing of a representative set of 'empty' sites revealed that 24-37 bp-long sequences, unrelated to each other but all able to fold into SLSs, functioned as targets for the integration of EFAR. In the process, most of the SLS had been deleted, but part of the targeted stems had been retained at EFAR termini.