In Tandem Intragenic Duplication of Doublesex and Mab-3-Related Transcription Factor 1 (DMRT1) in an SRY-Negative Boy with a 46,XX Disorder of Sex Development.

Disorders of sexual development (DSDs) encompass a group of congenital conditions associated with atypical development of internal and external genital structures. Among those with DSDs are 46,XX males, whose condition mainly arises due to the translocation of SRY onto an X chromosome or an autosome. In the few SRY-negative 46,XX males, overexpression of other pro-testis genes or failure of pro-ovarian/anti-testis genes may be involved, even if a non-negligible number of cases remain unexplained. A three-year-old boy with an SRY-negative 46,XX karyotype showed a normal male phenotype and normal prepubertal values for testicular hormones. A heterozygous de novo in tandem duplication of 50,221 bp, which encompassed exons 2 and 3 of the Doublesex and Mab-3-related transcription factor 1 (DMRT1) gene, was detected using MPLA, CGH-array analysis, and Sanger sequencing. Both breakpoints were in the intronic regions, and this duplication did not stop or shift the coding frame. Additional pathogenic or uncertain variants were not found in a known pro-testis/anti-ovary gene cascade using a custom NGS panel and whole genome sequencing. The duplication may have allowed DMRT1 to escape the transcriptional repression that normally occurs in 46,XX fetal gonads and thus permitted the testicular determination cascade to switch on. So far, no case of SRY-negative 46,XX DSD with alterations in DMRT1 has been described.

Eosinophilia and potential antibody cross-reactivity between parasites in a child with pinworm and immune dysregulation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal parasitic infections are common in humans, especially among young children. These conditions are often asymptomatic and self-limiting, and diagnosis is mainly based on the search for ova and parasites in the stools since serology may be biased due to cross reactivity between parasites. Pinworm is common in children and is not usually associated with hypereosinophilia; adhesive-tape test is the gold standard testing for the microscopic detection of Enterobious vermicularis (Ev) eggs. CASE PRESENTATION: A 13-year-old boy was referred due to a self-resolving episode of vomiting and palpebral oedema after dinner, together with a history of chronic rhinitis, chronic cough, absolute IgA deficiency and Hashimoto's thyroiditis and hypereosinophilia (higher value = 3140/µl). On evaluation we detected only palpable thyroid and hypertrophic nasal turbinates. Food allergy was excluded, but skin prick tests showed sensitization to house dust mites and cat epithelium and spirometry showed a marked obstructive pattern with positive bronchodilation test prompting the diagnosis of asthma for which maintenance inhaled treatment was started. Chest x-ray and abdomen ultrasound were negative. Further blood testing showed positive IgG anti-Echinococcus spp. and Strongyloides stercoralis and positive IgE for Ascaris, while Ev were detected both by the adhesive tape test and stool examination, so that we made a final diagnosis of pinworm infection. Three months after adequate treatment with pyrantel pamoate the adhesive-tape test turned out negative and blood testing showed a normal eosinophil count. The child later developed also type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest the need to investigate for enterobiasis in children with hypereosinophilia and to consider autoimmunity as a potential confounding factor when interpreting serology for helminths.

Emotional dysregulation and callous unemotional traits as possible predictors of short-term response to methylphenidate monotherapy in drug-naïve youth with ADHD.

BACKGROUND: Emotional dysregulation (ED) and callous unemotional (CU) traits can be associated with ADHD in youth, influencing its natural history and outcome, but their effect on medication efficacy is unexplored. We examined whether two measures of baseline ED and CU traits, the Child Behavior Checklist-Dysregulation Profile (CBCL-DP) and the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD), respectively, were predictors of change of ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS) after a 4-week methylphenidate (MPH) monotherapy. METHODS: 43 patients (37 males, 8-16 years, mean 9.9 ± 2.7 years) were included. Hierarchical linear regression models were used to explore whether CBCL-DP and APSD might predict ADHD-RS score, controlling for baseline severity. RESULTS: Baseline CBCL-DP predicted higher post-treatment ADHD-RS scores in total and hyperactivity-impulsivity, but not in inattention subscale. Baseline APSD was not significantly related to ADHD-RS scores at the follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, lack of gender diversity, non-blind design and short period of observation. CONCLUSION: ED, assessed with that CBCL-DP, might be a negative predictor of change of hyperactive-impulsive symptoms after MPH treatment and should be systematically assessed at baseline.