Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58771, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779266

RESUMO

Femoral hernias carry an increased risk of incarceration. De Garengeot hernia, a rare subset, occurs when the appendix herniates through the femoral canal. Due to its rarity, various surgical approaches have been explored, including isolated groin incisions, combined approaches, and exclusive laparoscopic interventions. This case involved a 58-year-old female diagnosed with a De Garengeot hernia and nonperforated acute appendicitis, managed through a combined laparoscopic and an inguinal approach, and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and open repair of femoral hernia using a biologic mesh. In this case, the combined approaches facilitated a successful hernia repair and appendectomy while enabling a swift recovery. This case highlights the effectiveness of the combined minimally invasive and inguinal approach in optimizing outcomes for patients with De Garengeot hernia.

2.
Surgery ; 163(4): 657-660, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29179912

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Incidental findings are prevalent in imaging but often go unreported to patients. Such unreported findings may present the potential for harm as well as medico-legal ramifications. METHODS: A chart review of trauma patients was undertaken over a year. Systems-based changes were made utilizing our electronic medical record system and our staff protocols to improve the disclosure of clinically relevant incidental findings to patients. RESULTS: During the preintervention period, 674 charts were reviewed. Trauma patients had a rate of incidental findings of 70%, and 36% of patients had clinically relevant incidentals. Rates of follow-up recommendation and disclosure to patients were 22% and 27%, respectively. In the postintervention period, of the 648 charts were reviewed, the rates of a clinically relevant incidental finding were 35%, but the rates of follow-up recommendation and disclosure to patients were 68% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Incidental findings are more prevalent herein than previously reported. With simple changes and minimal resources, clinically relevant and important improvement in reporting incidental findings can be made to mitigate the harm and medico-legal impact of an incidental finding going unreported.


Assuntos
Achados Incidentais , Revelação da Verdade , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Centros de Traumatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...