RESUMO
Digitalization of pathology workflows has undergone a rapid evolution and has been widely established in the diagnostic field but remains a challenge in the nonclinical safety context due to lack of regulatory guidance and validation experience for good laboratory practice (GLP) use. One means to demonstrate that digital slides are fit for purpose, that is, provide sufficient quality for pathologists to reach a diagnosis, is conduction of comparison studies, which have been published both, for veterinary and human diagnostic pathology, but not for toxicologic pathology. Here, we present an approach that uses study material from nonclinical safety studies and that allows for the statistical comparison of concordance rates for glass and digital slide evaluation while minimizing time and effort for the involved personnel. Using a benchmark study design, we demonstrate that evaluation of digital slides fits the purpose of nonclinical safety evaluation. These results add to reports of successful workflow validations and support the full adaptation of digital pathology in the regulatory field.
RESUMO
The clinical and pathological records of 44 domestic, female rabbits with an age ranging from 6-124 months (median age: 63.5 month) were assessed retrospectively for ovarian lesions. Included were all rabbits that underwent an ovariohysterectomy with a subsequent pathological examination of the genital tract between March 1997 and June 2016. Pathological examination revealed ovarian lesions in 12 of the 44 rabbits including follicular cysts (n=7), cystic rete ovarii (n=3), widespread ovarian necrosis with dystrophic calcification (n=2), ovarian adenoma (n=1). Clinical examination including radiographs only suggested ovarian disorders in two cases of ovarian necrosis with dystrophic calcification and in two cases of cystic rete ovarii. Clinical significance was only conclusive in a case of cystic rete ovarii.
