Influence of Home Location on Follow-Up Compliance after Endovascular Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The complications of EVAR require compliance to a close follow-up imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine whether home location predicted a poor compliance to imaging follow-up after EVAR. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of patients treated by EVAR at the Besançon University Hospital between 2007 and 2017. Follow-up imaging followed the French High Health Authority recommendations. Noncompliance with follow-up compliance was defined as a first missed postoperative appointment or 2 consecutive missed appointments after the first control CT-scan, and 2 groups of patients were identified: compliant (group C) or noncompliant (group NC). Univariate and multivariate analyzes were used to investigate compliance risk factors. Collected complications included endoleaks, limb thrombosis, infections, and secondary ruptures. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight of the 359 patients treated during this period were enrolled, including 233 men (90.3%), with a mean age of 74.0 years (±9.0) and a mean follow-up of 5.0 years (±2.6). The compliance rate was 38.8% and the 1-year mortality rate was 12.0%. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, a place of residence greater located over 60 min away from the hospital had a poor effect on compliance (Odd ratio [OR] = 0.58; P = 0.047). Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD) and an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter greater than 5.0 cm were protective factors (OR = 2.23; P = 0.006 and OR = 1.85, respectively; P = 0.002). Four-year all-cause mortality was 21.0% in group C and 17.0% in the NC group (P = 0.54). Complications were more significant in group C (59.0%) compared to group NC (39.0%) (P = 0.001). Two ruptures occurred in the NC group (1.3%), versus none in the C group (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a long distance from the home to the hospital was a detrimental factor for follow up compliance. However, a good compliance did not decrease the 4-year mortality rate. The high rate of noncompliance found should lead to a more personalized follow-up strategy taking into account the anatomical elements but also the comorbidities and some social aspects.

Snuff-Box Versus Wrist Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: Maturation Tend and its Affecting Factors.

BACKGROUND: Thanks to its well proved long-term patency rates, native radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula remains the most commonly used vascular access type. Many articles had approached the criteria leading to a mature fistula. The aims of this work are to evaluate variables that may affect the maturation of distal fistulas and to determine if wrist fistulas have less risk of maturation failure than the snuff-box fistulas. METHODS: We recorded all distal radiocephalic fistulas that had been created from January 2018 to February 2021. Epidemiological and clinical profile of patients, characteristics of performed fistulas and per and post-operative data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2018 to February 2021, 165 upper limb vascular accesses for hemodialysis had been created including 47 (28.5%) distal radiocephalic fistulas. Among the latter, 39 (83%) fistulas were performed at the wrist and 8 (17%) at snuff-box area. There were 34 men (72.3%). Mean age was 67 years (37-87). Both types of fistulas had approximately an identic frequency of primary maturation failure (50% for radiocephalic versus 47.2% for snuff-box fistulas). Secondary maturation had been achieved in 9 fistulas. Patients with medical history of dyslipidemia, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), central catheter placement, and bad quality of vessels tend to develop an immature fistula. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in maturation tend between snuff-box and wrist fistulas had been demonstrated. Thus, it seems reasonable to privilege the creation of the most distal fistulas allowing preservation of wrist fistulas as a second option in case of snuff-box fistulas maturation failure. However, selection of the most suitable cases for snuff-box fistulas creation, based on clinical and duplex ultrasound data, remains primordial.

Risk Factors of Long-Term Incisional Hernia after Open Surgery for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Bicentric Study.

BACKGROUND: Conventional open surgery is still important beside endovascular surgery in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with less reinterventions in the long-term follow-up. Incisional hernias are the major complication open surgery in the mid- and long term. The occurrence of this late complication could be due to the choice of the incision, median or transverse. The objectives of our retrospective and bicentric study were to characterize the long-term risk factors for incisional hernias after open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms, in particular by comparing the 2 types of laparotomy, and to determine the prevalence of the operated and not operated incisional hernias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2011, all the patients having elective open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) by midline laparotomy at the University hospital of Besancon or by transversal laparotomy at the University Hospital of Strasbourg were included retrospectively. The demographic data, the time of diagnosis of the incisional hernia and the parietal reinterventions were collected during a 5-year postoperative follow-up. A univariate and multivariate Cox model was used for the statistical analysis to determine the long-term risk factors for the appearance of an incisional hernia. RESULTS: During the study period, 223 patients presenting with AAA were included, 112 of them were operated by a midline laparotomy and 111 by a transverse laparotomy. The mean age of the patients was 69 ± 8,4years and 208 (93.3%) were men. The 5-year prevalence of incisional hernias was 14.3% (32), and 20 of these hernias (9%) had to be operated. Eighteen hernias (16.1%) occurred after a midline laparotomy and 14 (12.6%) after a transverse incision (P = 0.30). In univariate analysis, obstructive chronic pulmonary disease was the only significant risk factor for incisional hernia (P = 0.01) and an age over 65 years appeared to protect against this risk (P = 0.049). These results were confirmed by multivariate analysis, which showed that obstructive chronic pulmonary disease was an independent risk factor for incisional hernia (HR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.16-4.75), and that an age over 65 years was a protective factor (HR = 0.49 95% IC 0.00-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The type of laparotomy did not modify the rate of incisional hernias. We showed that only 9% of the patients had to be operated to treat an incisional hernia during the first 5 years after surgery for AAA in our bicentric study. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the only independent risk factor for the occurrence of an incisional hernia.