Ovarian cancer management in an ESGO ovarian cancer center of excellence: a systematic case study of the interprofessional and interdisciplinary interaction.

PURPOSE: With growing knowledge about ovarian cancer over the last decades, diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of ovarian cancer patients have become highly specialized, and an individually adapted approach should be made in each woman by interdisciplinary cooperation. The present study aims to show the variety and extent of medical specialties involved at our institution according to the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) Quality indicators (QI). METHODS: A woman, diagnosed with high-grade ovarian cancer, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) class IVb was selected for a single case observational study. The observation period (total = 22d) comprised preoperative diagnostic procedures, including imaging, the in-patient stay for cytoreductive surgery, and the postoperative course and case discussion at our interdisciplinary tumor board. Data were obtained by self-reporting and by patient file review. RESULTS: Patient tracking demonstrated an interdisciplinary cooperation of 12 medical specialties [62 physicians (63% male, 37% female)], 8 different types of nursing staff [n = 59 (22% male, 78% female)], and 9 different types of perioperative/administrative staff (n = 23; male 17,4%, female n = 19, 82,6%). Contact with the patient was direct (n = 199; 76%) or without face-to-face interaction (n = 63; 24%). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the high diversity of physicians and the affiliated medical staff, as well as interdisciplinary intersections within teams of a specialized hospital. Matching the ESGO QIs, this report underlines the requirement of an adequate infrastructure for the complex management of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the specific procedures and actions to optimize the interprofessional and interdisciplinary workflows.

Patients' subjective assessment as a decisive predictor of malignancy in pelvic masses: results of a multicentric, prospective pelvic mass study.

OBJECTIVE: The prognosis for ovarian cancer patients remains poor. A key to maximizing survival rates is early detection and treatment. This requires an accurate prediction of malignancy. Our study seeks to improve the accuracy of prediction by focusing on early subjective assessment of malignancy. We therefore investigated the assessment of patients themselves in comparison to the assessment of physicians. METHODS: One thousand three hundred and thirty patients participated in a prospective and multicenter study in six hospitals in Berlin. Using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models, we measured the accuracy of the early subjective assessment in comparison to the final histological outcome. Moreover, we investigated factors related to the assessment of patients and physicians. RESULTS: The patients' assessment of malignancy is remarkably accurate. With a positive predictive value of 58%, the majority of patients correctly assessed a pelvic mass as malignant. With more information available, physicians achieved only a slightly more accurate prediction of 63%. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, our study considered subjective factors in the diagnostic process of pelvic masses. This paper demonstrates that the patients' personal assessment should be taken seriously as it can provide a significant contribution to earlier diagnosis and thus improved therapy and overall prognosis.

Prognostic Value and Therapeutic Implications of Pleural Carcinosis and Malignant Pleural Effusion in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

AIM: To demonstrate the prognostic value of pleural carcinosis/effusion in a cohort of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and the associated therapeutic implications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, data for 388 patients with EOC with confirmed malignant pleural effusion (MPE) or pleural carcinosis were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria were non-epithelial ovarian malignancies and presence of other comorbidities associated with pleural effusions. RESULTS: The prognosis after the occurrence of MPE during the EOC in relapsed cases was poor with an overall survival of 9.9 months. In the multivariate analysis, the time point of the manifestation of the pleural effusion (p<0.001), platinum sensitivity (p=0.003), performance status (p=0.045) and presence of ascites (p=0.004) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Even in this less favorable collective, well-established EOC prognostic factors were associated with a significantly better overall survival. This suggests that the overall behavioral pattern of the disease has strong similarities in patients with and without pleural effusion or carcinosis and merits an equally high therapeutic effort.

Combined surgical and hormone therapy for endometriosis is the most effective treatment: prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 therapy strategies: hormone therapy, surgery, and combined treatment. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study (Canadian Task Force classification I). SETTING: University-based teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Four hundred fifty patients with genital endometriosis, aged 18 to 44 years, before first laparoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: hormone therapy, surgery, or combined treatment. Patients were reevaluated at second-look laparoscopy, at 2 to 2 months after 3-month hormone therapy in groups 1 and 3 and at 5 to 6 months in group 2 (surgical treatment alone). Outcome data were focussed on the endometriosis stage, recurrence of symptoms, and pregnancy rate. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All treatment options, independent of the initial Endoscopic Endometriosis Classification stage, achieved an overall cure rate of ≥50%. A cure rate of 60% was achieved with the combined treatment, 55% with exclusively hormone therapy, and 50% with exclusively surgical treatment. Recurrence of symptoms was lowest in patients who received combined treatment. Significant benefit was achieved for dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. An overall pregnancy rate of 55% to 65% was achieved, with no significant difference between the therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: In the quest to find the most effective treatment of genital endometriosis, this clinical randomized study shows the lowest incidence of recurrence with combined surgical and medical treatment and improved pregnancy rate in any medically treated patients with or without surgery. The highest cure rate (Endoscopic Endometriosis Classification stage 0) for endometriosis was also achieved in the combined treatment group.

Quality of life and sexuality of patients after treatment for gynaecological malignancies: results of a prospective study in 55 patients.

AIM: To assess the sexuality and quality of life (QoL) of women with gynaecological malignancies after multimodal therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective analysis of the sexual status among women after treatment for gynaecological malignancies. Validated questionnaires-female sexual function index (FSFI-d), a semi-structured questionnaire and the quality of life score SF12, were applied. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients (median age=61, range=22-74 years) were enrolled. The cancer diagnoses were 54% ovarian, 26% breast, 13% cervical, 6% vulvar and 2% endometrial cancer. Twenty patients (55.6%) claimed experiencing changes in their sexuality after cancer treatment. The main reasons for this impairment were distorsion of their self image (45%; n=9), dry vaginal mucosa (25%; n=5), fear of physical harm (20%; n=4) and pain during sexual intercourse (20%; n=4). Forty percent of the patients gave no information about their sexuality after cancer therapy. Patients with cervical, endometrial or vulvar cancer had significantly higher changes in their sexuality compared to patients with ovarian cancer even after adjusting for age, recurrence rate and partnership status. The evaluation of SF12 revealed significantly higher psychological functional scores with increasing age. Patients who reported changes of their sexuality were also shown to have a lower overall SF12 score. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of sexuality and self image perception after cancer treatment is an unmet need and needs to be addressed in women with gynaecological malignancies. Further studies are warranted to assess the influence of the various types of cancer therapies in regard to their effect on sexuality and quality of life.