[First French-speaking days of users of decision support system in clinical pharmacy: Feedback and perspectives]. / Premières journées francophones des utilisateurs de système d'aide à la décision en pharmacie clinique : retour d'expériences et perspectives.

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are tools that have been used for several years by clinical pharmacy teams to support pharmaceutical analysis, with a perspective of contributing to the quality of care in collaboration with the other health care team members. These tools require both technical, logistical and human resources. The growing use of these systems in different establishments in France and in Europe gave birth to the idea of meeting to share our experiences. The days organized in Lille in September 2021 aimed at proposing a time of exchange and reflection on the use of these CDSS in clinical pharmacy. A first session was devoted to feedback from each establishment. These tools are essentially used to optimize pharmaceutical analysis and to secure patient medication management. This session outlined the clear advantages and common limitations of these CDSS. Two research projects were also presented to put the use of these tools into perspective. The second session of these days, in the form of workshops, addressed 4 themes that surround the implementation of CDSS: their usability, the legal aspect, the creation of rules and their possible valorization. Common problems were raised, the resolution of which requires close collaboration. This is a first step proposing a beginning of harmonization and sharing that should be deepened in order not to lose the dynamics created between the different centers. This event ended with the proposal to set up two working groups around these systems: the creation and structuring of rules for the detection of risk situations and the common valorization of the work.

The Care Coordinator's Tasks During the Implementation of an Integrated Care Pathway for Older Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the French National "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" Pilot Program.

Background: Although integrated care and care coordination are known to be beneficial for older adults' population, the specific tasks of a Care Coordinator (CC) for integrated care pathways for this population have not been studied in detail. Setting & Subjects: The French national pilot program PAERPA provided an integrated care pathway for older adults. In North France, a CC was recruited to support patients and professionals. Objectives: (i) To analyse the CC's tasks in an integrated care pathway for older patients, and (ii) to record perceptions on the CC's tasks among the participating general practitioners (GP) and community pharmacists. Design & Methods: Qualitative, two-phase study: (i) Task analysis of the CC's tasks, to compare the planned and actual tasks; (ii) semi-structured interviews among GPs and community pharmacists involved in the pathway. Results: (i) The task analysis showed that the CC's actual tasks differed from planned tasks. The CC was only meant to be involved in the early stages of the process; actually, the CC undertook more or even unforeseen tasks in coordination, communication, and administrative support throughout the care pathways. (ii) The 28 interviewed healthcare professionals considered the CC's tasks to be essential to the success of pathways. They appreciated the CC's administrative support. However, CC's tasks related to interprofessional communication, and patient and family information, were controversially perceived among GPs and pharmacists. Conclusions: The CC's tasks in an integrated care pathway for older adults showed that the CC's overall workload was greater than expected and appreciated by healthcare professionals.

Explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics in hospitalized older patients.

CONTEXT: The use of explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics (antibiotic PIPs) might constitute an innovative means to fight against antimicrobial resistance. Explicit definitions of PIPs can reduce the rate of inappropriate prescriptions, but explicit definitions of antibiotic PIPs in geriatric medicine are currently lacking. The objective of the study was to develop explicit definitions of antibiotic PIPs for hospitalized older patients. METHOD: We performed a qualitative study of focus groups involving geriatricians and infectious disease specialists. The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Transcripts of audio recordings were analyzed in a two-step independent reviewing process. The exact wording of the definitions was validated by a steering committee, an independent expert group, and the focus group participants. RESULTS: The four focus groups comprised 28 stakeholders. Our analysis identified 65 explicit definitions of antibiotic PIPs: 47 (73%) concerned misuse, 15 (23%) concerned overuse and three (5%) concerned underuse. Most definitions were related to critically important antibiotics: 11 (17%) for fluoroquinolones, eight (12%) for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, eight (12%) for cephalosporins, seven (11%) for aminoglycosides, and five (8%) for carbapenems. CONCLUSION: To address the public health challenge of antimicrobial resistance, our study generated explicit definitions for antibiotic PIPs in older patients. We intend to refine and to validate these definitions through a national Delphi survey; the resulting consensus might provide key messages for prescribers and open up perspectives for reducing the incidence of antibiotic PIPs.

Terms used by physicians when deciding to withhold treatment for older patients not having received palliative care in an acute geriatric care unit.

PURPOSE: There are no guidelines or consensus statements on the terms to be used when discussing withholding of treatment for patients in acute geriatric care units and who have not received palliative care. The objective of the present study was to analyze the terms used in medical records to refer to the withholding of treatment for patients who died in an acute geriatric care unit and did not receive palliative care. METHODS: We conducted an ambispective multicentre cohort study based on the DAMAGE study. Data on 53 patients who died in the acute geriatric care unit and who had not received palliative care were extracted from medical records. The verbatims referring to the withholding of treatment were analyzed in terms of keywords and then key concepts, as defined by several reviewers in a consensus-based approach. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 86.4 years, 34.1% were male. Terms referring to the withholding of treatment were found for 25 of the 53 patients (47.2%). Most of the decisions on the withholding of treatment were recorded in the week following admission to the acute geriatric care unit. Our analysis of the terms identified 11 key concepts: treatment limitation, no resuscitation, withholding diagnostic procedures, justification of care, ethical considerations, disease progression, uncertainty, the patient's wishes, the family's wishes, patient's comfort, and collegiality. The terms used to describe key concepts varied markedly from one physician to another. CONCLUSION: Decisions about the withholding of treatment are frequently noted in the medical records of patients who die in the acute geriatric care unit without having received palliative care. The broad variety of key concepts and differences in the choice of words highlight the need for standardized terms.

The clinical pharmacist's role in enhancing the relevance of a clinical decision support system.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can improve the quality of patient care by helping physicians to review their prescriptions and thus to optimize drug treatments. Nevertheless, the "alert fatigue" brought on by a large number of irrelevant alerts can decrease a CDSS's effectiveness and thus clinical value. Involving a clinical pharmacist in the development and management of a CDSS can reduce the number of irrelevant alerts presented to physicians. Clinical pharmacists screen alerts and suggest PIs for physicians, corresponding to any proposed therapeutic change about health products, only for relevant alerts could improve the relevance and the acceptance of the information given to physicians about the risks faced by their patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of involving clinical pharmacists in the development and maintenance of decision support rules for generating alerts and pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) and to describe the level of acceptance of these PIs by the physicians. METHOD: In a retrospective, single-centre study, we evaluated the number of PIs accepted from alerts generated by the CDSS when a clinical pharmacist had developed and managed this tool. During the first 7 months of development of the CDSS, a clinical pharmacist analyzed alerts triggered by the CDSS according to its technical validity and pharmaceutical relevance. Lastly, for alerts that led to a PI, the level of acceptance by physicians was documented. RESULTS: During the study, 1430 alerts were analysed: 186 (13%) were considered to be technically invalid - mainly due to the characteristics of the interface. Of the 1244 (87.0%) technically valid alerts, 353 (24.6%) were pharmaceutically relevant and led to a PI. The three main causes of pharmaceutical irrelevance were a lack of specificity in the CDSS (70.8%), lack of relevance with regard to the ward's habits (15.6%), and the pharmacist's decision to recommend monitoring for the patient rather than sending a PI immediately (10.8%). 64.6% of the submitted PIs were accepted by the physicians. CONCLUSION: The standardized analysis of alerts by a clinical pharmacist appears to be a good way of improving the development of CDSS by limiting the generation of irrelevant alerts and the latter's transmission to physicians. The involvement of a clinical pharmacist in the development and implementation of a CDSS appears to be novel and may help to optimize drug treatment.

Hip fractures and characteristics of living area: a fine-scale spatial analysis in France.

We investigated the association between hip fracture incidence and living area characteristics in France. The spatial distribution of hip fracture incidence was heterogeneous and there was a significant relationship between social deprivation, urbanization, health access, and hip fracture risk. INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown great disparities in spatial repartition of hip fractures (HF). The aim of the study was to analyze the association between HF incidence and characteristics of the living area. METHODS: All patients aged 50 or older, living in France, who were hospitalized for HF between 2012 and 2014 were included, using the French national hospital discharge database. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated for each spatial unit and adjusted on age and sex. An ecological regression was performed to analyze the association between HF standardized incidence and ecological variables. We adjusted the model for neighborhood spatial structure. We used three variables to characterize the living areas: a deprivation index (French-EDI); healthcare access (French standardized index); land use (percentage of artificialized surfaces). RESULTS: A total of 236,328 HF were recorded in the French hospital national database, leading to an annual HF incidence of 333/100,000. The spatial analysis revealed geographical variations of HF incidence with SIR varying from 0.67 (0.52; 0.85) to 1.45 (1.23; 1.70). There was a significant association between HF incidence rates and (1) French-EDI (trend p = 0.0023); (2) general practitioner and nurse accessibility (trend p = 0.0232 and p = 0.0129, respectively); (3) percentage of artificialized surfaces (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the living area are associated with significant differences in the risk of hip fracture of older people.

A generic method for improving the spatial interoperability of medical and ecological databases.

BACKGROUND: The availability of big data in healthcare and the intensive development of data reuse and georeferencing have opened up perspectives for health spatial analysis. However, fine-scale spatial studies of ecological and medical databases are limited by the change of support problem and thus a lack of spatial unit interoperability. The use of spatial disaggregation methods to solve this problem introduces errors into the spatial estimations. Here, we present a generic, two-step method for merging medical and ecological databases that avoids the use of spatial disaggregation methods, while maximizing the spatial resolution. METHODS: Firstly, a mapping table is created after one or more transition matrices have been defined. The latter link the spatial units of the original databases to the spatial units of the final database. Secondly, the mapping table is validated by (1) comparing the covariates contained in the two original databases, and (2) checking the spatial validity with a spatial continuity criterion and a spatial resolution index. RESULTS: We used our novel method to merge a medical database (the French national diagnosis-related group database, containing 5644 spatial units) with an ecological database (produced by the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, and containing with 36,594 spatial units). The mapping table yielded 5632 final spatial units. The mapping table's validity was evaluated by comparing the number of births in the medical database and the ecological databases in each final spatial unit. The median [interquartile range] relative difference was 2.3% [0; 5.7]. The spatial continuity criterion was low (2.4%), and the spatial resolution index was greater than for most French administrative areas. CONCLUSIONS: Our innovative approach improves interoperability between medical and ecological databases and facilitates fine-scale spatial analyses. We have shown that disaggregation models and large aggregation techniques are not necessarily the best ways to tackle the change of support problem.

Systematic skin examination in an acute geriatric unit: skin cancer prevalence.

BACKGROUND: Ageing is a determining factor in skin cancer, but the incidence and prevalence of skin cancer in elderly patients are not known. AIM: To determine the prevalence of skin cancers in elderly patients and to assess their associated geriatric syndromes. METHODS: Between January and April 2013, all consecutive incident patients hospitalized in the Acute Geriatric Unit of Lille University Hospital underwent a geriatric assessment and a systematic dermatological examination. A biopsy was taken whenever there was any lesion with suspicion of malignancy. RESULTS: In total, 204 patients (mean age 85.4 years) were included, and 16 cutaneous biopsies were taken from 15 patients. Histological examination confirmed skin cancer in 11 biopsies from 10 patients: 9 basal cell carcinomas, 1 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 1 malignant lentigo. The prevalence of skin cancer was 4.9%. The geriatric assessment revealed severe geriatric syndromes in the 10 patients with skin cancer: severe dependence (8/10), possible cognitive impairment (10/10), and moderate or severe malnutrition (5/10). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of skin cancer is high in frail elderly patients. The association of severe geriatric syndromes suggests that close collaboration between geriatricians and dermatologists is essential to optimize the treatment of skin carcinoma in elderly patients.

Anti-sRAGE autoimmunity in obesity: downturn after bariatric surgery is independent of previous diabetic status.

AIM: Morbid obesity increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) is implicated in proinflammatory processes that underlie CVD. Its soluble form (sRAGE) has been proposed as a vascular biomarker. Recently, anti-sRAGE autoantibodies were described and found to be increased in diseases where RAGE is overexpressed. This study aimed to investigate serum levels of anti-sRAGE autoantibodies in morbidly obese patients. METHODS: After exclusion based on specific criteria, 150 subjects (50 normoglycemics, 50 glucose-intolerants and 50 diabetics) were randomly recruited from a cohort of 750 obese patients (ABOS). Serum sRAGE and anti-sRAGE autoantibodies were measured before bariatric surgery. Sixty-nine patients were followed for up to 1year after gastric bypass, and their levels of sRAGE and anti-sRAGE autoantibodies measured. The control group consisted of healthy blood donors. RESULTS: Compared with controls, baseline levels of sRAGE and anti-sRAGE autoantibodies were significantly higher in all obese patients independently of glucose regulation (P<0.001). At 1year after gastric bypass, sRAGE and anti-sRAGE were decreased (P<0.001). The decrease in anti-sRAGE autoantibodies was correlated with an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Independently of previous diabetic status, morbid obesity increases sRAGE and anti-sRAGE levels. Weight loss after gastric bypass is followed by a decrease in both titres. The decrease in anti-sRAGE correlates with an increase in HDL.