Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 142(1): 101-7, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24129976

RESUMO

Perceptions among women with breast cancer about the relative importance of different potential chemotherapy side effects is not well understood. A survey was performed by women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Grade I/II (mild to moderate) and III/IV (moderate to severe) descriptions of nine common chemotherapy side effects were assigned preference weights using the standard gamble technique. For each hypothetical side effect, patients could choose to stay in the respective side effect state or take a gamble between full health (probability p) or being dead (1 - p). For each side effect, p was varied until the patient was indifferent between these options. The survey also included questions about the importance of survival, slowing cancer growth, and quality of life. This analysis included 69 patients; mean age 54 years (range 35-84), representing all cancer stages. Standard gamble preferences were lowest (i.e., least preferred) for grade III/IV nausea/vomiting (0.621), indicating that patients would, on average, risk a 38 % chance of being dead to avoid having grade III/IV nausea/vomiting for the rest of their lives. The next least preferred side effects were grade III/IV diarrhea (0.677) and grade III/IV sensory neuropathy (0.694). Survival appeared more important than slowing cancer growth and maintaining quality of life across cancer stages. Nevertheless, patients with advanced disease placed less importance on survival (p = 0.09) and higher importance on quality of life (p = 0.05). These standard gamble utilities provide unique insights into chemotherapy toxicities from the patient perspective. Differences in the relative importance of overall survival and quality of life with treatment existed between patients with different stages of disease. These studies should be expanded as the data may also be used to calculate quality-adjusted life expectancy in cost-effectiveness evaluations of breast cancer chemotherapies.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Lupus ; 22(10): 1038-45, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23963432

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a conceptual model illustrating the relationships between the physician-patient relationship and patient outcomes, including health status and regimen satisfaction, in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of a geographically diverse sample of adults with SLE in the United States. Patients completed a Web-based survey that focused on physician interactions, clinical management, and patient outcomes, including patient perception of treatment regimen and health status. All survey variables related to physician interactions and patient perceptions of their health and satisfaction were evaluated for incorporation into a patient-centered model using cluster analysis. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to assess the inter-relationships observed among the variables to inform the development of a conceptual model of SLE patient-centered care. RESULTS: A total of 302 SLE patients completed the survey. The majority of patients were female (94.3%) with a mean age of 46 years. The cluster analysis resulted in six main factors: 1) physician interactions, 2) current health and hope, 3) satisfaction with treatment, 4) bedside manner, 5) discussion of lupus impacts during physician visits, and 6) steroid treatment. The significant relationships among the factors showed that positive physician interactions, such as including the patient in treatment decisions, were associated with higher satisfaction with treatment regimen and patients feeling that SLE was well controlled, a more favorable perception of current health, and being more hopeful about future health. Among the components of physician interactions, setting goals with patients is particularly important, as this was significantly associated with the patient being more hopeful about future health. Being steroid free was significantly related to higher treatment satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The study findings informed a conceptual model of SLE patient-centered care that may be used to create more targeted education programs in the management of SLE, with the goal to improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/terapia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Assistência Centrada no Paciente
3.
Br J Cancer ; 101(3): 387-9, 2009 Aug 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19603025

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No studies measure preference-based utilities in advanced melanoma that capture both intended clinical response and unintended toxicities associated with treatment. METHODS: Using standard gamble, utilities were elicited from 140 respondents in the United Kingdom and Australia for 13 health states. RESULTS: Preferences decreased with reduced treatment responsiveness and with increasing toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: These general population utilities can be incorporated into treatment-specific cost-effectiveness evaluations.


Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Austrália , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reino Unido
4.
AIDS Care ; 20(2): 244-52, 2008 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18293136

RESUMO

Research on HIV medication adherence has relied mainly on quantitative methods. The objective of this study was to explore factors associated with adherence from the HIV-infected patient's perspective. Six focus groups were convened with treatment-experienced HIV-positive individuals. The discussions focused on issues that make it easy or difficult to adhere to HIV regimens. Thirty-five patients participated in the focus groups, which were conducted in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles. The mean age was 48; 66% were male; 63% were black; and 40% contracted HIV through heterosexual contact. Six major themes emerged from the data that influenced adherence to medication: regimen complexity/medication features (including number of pills), lifestyle fit, emotional impacts (including worry, anger, stress and anxiety), side effects, medication effectiveness, and communication (including information from friends, physicians, and published sources). The data informed a conceptual framework, illustrating the possible interactions among these themes that can potentially be used by clinicians when discussing HIV treatment options with patients. This is potentially one of the first focus group studies concentrating on HIV medication adherence. The findings highlight specific factors that should be considered when trying to improve adherence and may be helpful in clinical decision-making.


Assuntos
Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/psicologia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/efeitos adversos , District of Columbia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Los Angeles , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente
5.
AIDS Care ; 19(8): 982-8, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17851994

RESUMO

The objective is to assess patient preferences for attributes associated with third agent HIV medications, including fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPVr), fosamprenavir (FPV), lopinavir/ritonavir (LPVr), atazanavir (ATZ), and efavirenz (EFV). Subjects with HIV were recruited in the US and Germany to complete a computerized adaptive conjoint survey that assessed 13 attributes, including moderate to severe side effects, regimen convenience, drug resistance and efficacy. Literature on the target third-agent HIV drugs was used to identify percentage risk and severity level descriptions for each attribute. The derived preference (utility) weights for each attribute level informed the calculation of relative importance estimates for each attribute and the desirability of combinations of attributes matching the respective target third agents. The analysis included 288 HIV-positive participants (US: 132; Germany: 156), 205 of whom were treatment-experienced and 83 of whom were treatment-naïve. Of the 13 medication attributes evaluated, developing drug resistance, the risk of lipodystrophy, the risk of gastronitestinal side effects (diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting) and regimen convenience had the greatest impact on preferences. The profile based on FPVr was most preferred. Differences in the risk of developing drug resistance, risk of lipodystrophy, risk of gastrointestinal side effects and regimen convenience would likely be most influential in the perceived relative value of a third-agent medication. Physicians may wish to consider these features, especially when discussing HIV treatment options with their patients.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Viral , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pirimidinonas/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Antirretrovirais/farmacologia , Esquema de Medicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/farmacologia , Humanos , Lopinavir , Masculino , Pirimidinonas/farmacologia , Ritonavir/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 13 Suppl 4: S21-9, 2003 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12948050

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate persistency (time on initial therapy) and the clinical impact of latanoprost versus beta-blocker monotherapy in treating glaucoma. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, retrospective medical chart review study conducted in four European countries included patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who began their first glaucoma treatment with latanoprost or a beta-blocker between November 1996 and November 1998. Persistency and glaucoma-related clinical outcomes data were abstracted for the 2 years following treatment initiation. RESULTS: In all, 260 patient charts were analyzed (94 latanoprost, 166 beta-blocker). Patients in the latanoprost group stayed on therapy twice as long as those who received a beta-blocker (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients receiving a beta-blocker as initial therapy were 3.8 times more likely to change therapy than those initially treated with latanoprost (p < 0.0001). Patients in the latanoprost group also experienced greater mean decreases in intraocular pressure (IOP) than those receiving a beta-blocker (7.4 mmHg versus 4.6 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.0001), and fewer had worsened optic nerve head excavation (1.7% versus 14.2%, respectively; p < 0.05) by the time of their first therapy change or last study visit, whichever came first. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 2-year period, latanoprost was associated with significantly greater persistency and better clinical IOP outcomes compared with beta-blocker therapy.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Glaucoma de Ângulo Aberto/tratamento farmacológico , Prostaglandinas F Sintéticas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular/efeitos dos fármacos , Latanoprosta , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Ocular/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Acuidade Visual
7.
Support Care Cancer ; 9(3): 169-76, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11401101

RESUMO

Our goal was to evaluate the impact of pamidronate therapy on medical resource utilization for treatment of bone metastases among patients with breast cancer. In this 12-center retrospective study, inpatient and outpatient resource utilization was abstracted from the medical charts of 295 patients with breast cancer who were diagnosed with bone metastases between July 1996 and April 1999. Data were abstracted from the time of bone metastasis diagnosis (baseline) to the present. The analysis compared non-pamidronate patients against pamidronate patients, who were stratified on the basis of whether their pamidronate therapy had been initiated within 3 months (early pamidronate group) or more than 3 months (late pamidronate group) after diagnosis. Resource utilization was compared among groups using multivariate regression analyses. A total of 101 early pamidronate, 72 late pamidronate, and 122 non-pamidronate patients were included in the analysis. The results showed that the early pamidronate group was roughly one-half as likely to have unplanned office visits attributable to bone metastases as the late pamidronate and non-pamidronate groups. The groups had a similar likelihood of ever being hospitalized for bone-related conditions; however, among those hospitalized, there were roughly one-half as many bone-related hospitalizations in the late pamidronate group as in the non-pamidronate group. Also, the mean length of stay was approximately 50% shorter in both pamidronate groups than in the non-pamidronate group. We conclude that pamidronate therapy may be associated with less medical resource utilization, particularly among patients hospitalized for bone-related conditions.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Difosfonatos/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pamidronato , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 44(1 Suppl): S65-72, 2001 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11145797

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis can have detrimental effects on health-related quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the QOL impact of tacrolimus ointment in patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Children's DLQI (CDLQI), and Toddler QOL Survey were used to assess QOL in adults (16 years or older), children (5-15 years), and toddlers (2-4 years) enrolled in 12-week, randomized, double-blind studies comparing two concentrations of tacrolimus ointment (0.03% and 0.1%) versus vehicle ointment for treatment of atopic dermatitis. QOL was assessed at baseline, week 3, and week 12/early discontinuation. RESULTS: Of the 985 patients enrolled, 91.5% had evaluable QOL data. Among adults, both tacrolimus ointment groups experienced improved QOL relative to the vehicle control group for all QOL scales (P<.001). Among children and toddlers, both tacrolimus ointment groups demonstrated significant QOL improvements relative to the vehicle control group (P<.05) for all but the Personal Relationships scale in the 0.03% tacrolimus ointment group among children. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus ointment is associated with significant QOL benefits in adults, children, and toddlers with atopic dermatitis.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Pomadas , Tacrolimo/administração & dosagem
9.
Urology ; 56(6): 972-80, 2000 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11113743

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To present the method used to evaluate the cost effectiveness, from the societal perspective, of transurethral microwave thermotherapy relative to medical therapy (alpha-blocking agents) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms. METHODS: We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model with 25 health states describing the 3 treatments, 5 short-term clinical events, and 17 possible long-term outcomes. Each health state had an associated cost and utility. Utility weights, reflecting an individual's preference for a specific health outcome, range from 0, indicating death, to 100, indicating perfect health. Utility estimates were obtained by interviewing 13 men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms using the standard gamble preference measurement technique. On the basis of their risk attitudes, the patients were classified as risk averse or non-risk averse. The rates of remission, temporary and permanent adverse events, retreatment, and mortality were obtained from the Targis System (Urologix) randomized clinical trial, published reports, and a consensus panel. The costs during the 5 years after treatment initiation were estimated using national Medicare reimbursement schedules. The costs are reported in 1999 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: Eliciting utility values from patients with BPH was feasible and generated internally consistent and externally valid measures. In the non-risk-averse group, the utility value for significant remission, moderate remission, no remission, and worsening BPH symptoms without an adverse event was 99.1, 97.1, 94.4, and 87.3, respectively. As expected, the risk-averse individuals (n = 6) exhibited higher utility values than those in the non-risk-averse group (n = 7). In the non-risk-averse group, thermotherapy was the preferred treatment, and in the risk-averse group, medical therapy was preferred. In both groups, TURP was the least preferred therapy. The initial thermotherapy procedure costs without complications were estimated at $2629, and the initial TURP procedure costs without complications were estimated at $4597. Time-dependent probabilities were developed to reflect treatment durability. CONCLUSIONS: The resulting model parameters appear to be suitable for evaluating the cost effectiveness of thermotherapy relative to medical therapy and TURP in 65-year-old men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Temperatura Alta/uso terapêutico , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/economia , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/economia
10.
Urology ; 56(6): 981-7, 2000 Dec 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11113744

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy relative to medical therapy (alpha-blocking agents) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for patients with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the societal perspective for a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old men with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness of thermotherapy relative to medical therapy and TURP during 5 years after treatment initiation. Event probabilities were obtained from published reports, a consensus panel, and the Targis System (Urologix) randomized clinical trial. Costs were estimated using the national Medicare reimbursement schedules. Costs are reported in 1999 U.S. dollars. Total thermotherapy procedure costs were estimated at $2629. Quality-of-life and utility estimates were obtained by interviewing 13 patients with moderate-to-severe BPH symptoms. On the basis of their risk attitudes, patients were classified into risk-averse or non-risk-averse groups. The costs and health effects were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: In a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 non-risk-averse patients who were candidates for all three modalities, the 5-year costs were highest for patients undergoing TURP and lowest for those receiving medical therapy ($7334 and $6294, respectively). The thermotherapy group exhibited the highest 5-year utility value (53.52 quality-adjusted life-months). Compared with medical therapy, thermotherapy resulted in an additional 0.23 quality-adjusted life-months, with an incremental cost of $741. This yielded an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained of $38,664 for thermotherapy compared with medical therapy. Thermotherapy had a higher utility (difference of 1.71 quality-adjusted life-months) and lower cost (difference of $299) compared with TURP and thus was dominant over TURP. The results were similar for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 risk-averse patients. CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, thermotherapy appears to be a reasonable and cost-effective alternative to both medical and surgical treatment. However, the actual treatment decision should be based on multiple factors, only one of which is cost effectiveness.


Assuntos
Temperatura Alta/uso terapêutico , Micro-Ondas/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/economia , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/economia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Custos de Medicamentos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Qualidade de Vida , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Circulation ; 101(3): 280-8, 2000 Jan 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10645924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation therapy versus amiodarone for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease. The analysis used a societal perspective for a hypothetical cohort of VT patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, who were experiencing frequent shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness of ablation relative to amiodarone over 5 years after treatment initiation. Event probabilities were from the Chilli randomized clinical trial (Chilli Cooled Ablation System, Cardiac Pathways Corporation, Sunnyvale, Calif), the literature, and a consensus panel. Costs were from 1998 national Medicare reimbursement schedules. Quality-of-life weights (utilities) were estimated using an established preference measurement technique. In a hypothetical cohort of 10 000 patients, 5-year costs were higher for patients undergoing ablation compared with amiodarone therapy ($21 795 versus $19 075). Ablation also produced a greater increase in quality of life (2.78 versus 2.65 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). This yielded a cost-effectiveness ratio of $20 923 per QALY gained for ablation compared with amiodarone. Results were relatively insensitive to assumptions about ablation success and durability. In less severe patients with good ejection fractions who suffer their first VT episode, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $6028 per QALY gained. These cost-effectiveness ratios are within the range generally thought to warrant technology adoption. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, from a societal perspective, catheter ablation appears to be a cost-effective alternative to amiodarone for treating VT patients.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/economia , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos
12.
Sleep ; 22(6): 757-65, 1999 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10505821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the burden of illness of narcolepsy and assess the health-related quality-of-life (HQL) effects of oral modafinil, a wake-promoting therapy for excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. METHODS: Subjects with narcolepsy enrolled in a nine-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study and were randomized to placebo, modafinil 200 mg, or modafinil 400 mg. After the study, consenting subjects received modafinil in a 40-week open-label extension. A self-administered HQL questionnaire consisting of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and supplemental narcolepsy-specific scales was given to subjects at baseline, study endpoint, and several open-label timepoints. RESULTS: 481 subjects completed a baseline and double-blind endpoint HQL assessment. Compared to population norms, baseline HQL scores reflected substantial burden in vitality, social functioning, and performing usual activities. At study endpoint, subjects in the 400 mg modafinil group had significantly higher scores than placebo for 10 of the 17 HQL scales. The 400 mg modafinil group had more energy, fewer difficulties performing usual activities, fewer interferences with social activities, improved psychological well-being and higher productivity, attention and self-esteem compared to placebo subjects (p<.05). The positive treatment effects were sustained over the open-label extension. CONCLUSION: Modafinil significantly improves health-related quality of life in narcolepsy.


Assuntos
Compostos Benzidrílicos/uso terapêutico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Nível de Saúde , Narcolepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modafinila , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Autoimagem , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 15(2): 179-95, 1999 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10351191

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, degenerative neuromuscular disease characterised by a progressive loss of voluntary motor activity. Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) has been shown to be useful in treating ALS. The purpose of this study was to examine the cost effectiveness of rhIGF-I therapy in patients who have ALS. DESIGN: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the societal perspective on 177 patients who received treatment with rhIGF-I or placebo in a North American randomised clinical trial. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of rhIGF-I using resource utilisation and functional status measurements from the clinical trial. Costs were estimated from 1996 US Medicare reimbursement schedules. Utility weights were elicited from ALS healthcare providers using the standard gamble technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: The overall cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for rhIGF-I therapy compared with placebo was $US67,440. For the subgroups of patients who were progressing rapidly or were in earlier stages of disease at enrolment, rhIGF-I cost $US52,823 and $US43,197 per QALY gained, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rhIGF-I is most cost effective in ALS patients who are either in earlier stages of the disease or progressing rapidly. The cost effectiveness of rhIGF-I therapy compares favourably with treatments for other chronic progressive diseases.


Assuntos
Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Lateral Amiotrófica/economia , Fator de Crescimento Insulin-Like I/economia , Fator de Crescimento Insulin-Like I/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/economia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
14.
Vasc Med ; 4(1): 1-7, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10355863

RESUMO

Venous stasis ulcers (VSU) account for approximately 80-90% of lower extremity ulcerations. Given their prevalence and chronic nature, VSU are thought to impose a significant economic burden on Medicare (the USA's largest health insurance program) and other third party payers. However, comprehensive studies on the costs of VSU treatment are lacking. The objective of this study therefore was to examine comprehensively the direct medical costs of treating patients with a VSU in routine clinical practice. A cohort of 78 patients who presented with a VSU to the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (CCF), a large primary and tertiary referral center, was studied retrospectively. All inpatient and outpatient costs related to VSU treatment that were incurred during the year following VSU presentation or until the ulcer healed, whichever occurred first, were quantified. A total of 71 (91%) patients healed during the study. The average duration of follow-up was 119 days (median: 84 days). The average number of visits per patient was seven (range: 2 to 57). A total of 14 (18%) patients underwent 18 hospitalizations for VSU care. The average total medical cost per patient was $9685 (median: $3036). Home health care, hospitalizations and home dressing changes accounted for 48%, 25% and 21% of total costs, respectively. Total costs were related to duration of active therapy, ulcer size and the presence of at least one comorbidity (p<0.05). VSU are costly to manage, especially when time to healing is prolonged. The present findings reflect an underestimate of VSU costs since indirect costs were not examined. Time absent from work, forced early retirement, loss of functional independence and unquantifiable suffering may be additional factors that contribute to the overall burden of VSU.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Úlcera Varicosa/terapia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
16.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 7(5): 763-73, 1996 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8738812

RESUMO

As a component of the open-label, multicenter National Cooperative Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (Epo) Study, the health-related quality-of-life effects of Epo therapy were assessed in 484 dialysis patients who had not previously been treated with Epo therapy (New-to-Epo) and 520 dialysis patients who were already receiving Epo therapy at the time of study enrollment (Old-to-Epo). Using scales from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), health-related quality of life was assessed on study enrollment (baseline) and at an average of 99 days follow-up. At baseline, SF-36 scores for Old- and New-to-Epo patients were well below those observed in the general population, reflecting substantial impairments in functional status and well-being among patients with chronic renal failure. Significant improvements from baseline to follow-up were observed among New-to-Epo patients in vitality, physical functioning, social functioning, mental health, looking after the home, social life, hobbies, and satisfaction with sexual activity (P < 0.05 for each). The mean improvements in hematocrit values among New-to-Epo and Old-to Epo patients were 4.6 and 0.3, respectively. At the time of follow-up, SF-36 scores for New-to-Epo patients were comparable with those observed among Old-to-Epo patients, whose scores did not change significantly from baseline to follow-up. Analysis of the relationship between Epo therapy, hematocrit values, and health-related quality of life suggest that some of the beneficial quality-of-life effects of Epo are mediated through a change in hematocrit level.


Assuntos
Anemia/prevenção & controle , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/etiologia , Anemia/psicologia , Anemia/reabilitação , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Hematócrito , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Grupos Raciais , Proteínas Recombinantes , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Autoavaliação (Psicologia)
17.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 9(1): 13-21, 1996 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8679058

RESUMO

Longitudinal data from a clinical trial were analyzed to evaluate the usefulness of the SF-36 Health Survey in estimating the impact of depression and changes in severity over time on the functional health and well-being of 532 patients, 60 to 86 years of age, who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Clinician's Global Impression of Severity and Improvement, and the Geriatric Depression Scale were used to define clinical severity and changes in severity over a 6-week period. Answers to SF-36 questions tended to be complete and to satisfy assumptions underlying methods of scale construction and scoring. As hypothesized, the SF-36 Mental Health Scale and Mental Component Summary measure, shown in previous studies to be most valid in measuring differences in mental health, exhibited the strongest associations with severity of depression in cross-sectional analyses and were most responsive to changes in severity in longitudinal comparisons. We conclude that the SF-36 Health Survey is useful for estimating the burden of depression and in monitoring changes in functional health and well-being over time among the depressed elderly.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas/classificação , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inventário de Personalidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fluoxetina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 7 Suppl: 125-37, 1995.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8580388

RESUMO

In a randomized 6-week trial comparing fluoxetine with placebo, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36) scales were used to measure the effects of treatment on functional health and well-being among elderly (age > or = 60 years) outpatients with major depression. In the fluoxetine and placebo groups, 261 and 271 patients, respectively, completed the SF-36 before treatment and at Weeks 3 and 6. Compared with national norms for individuals over age 60, study patients before treatment exhibited baseline decrements on the following SF-36 scales: mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, social functioning, vitality, role limitations due to physical problems, and bodily pain. Analyses of SF-36 changed scores from baseline to Week 6 revealed that the fluoxetine group improved more than the placebo group across all scales. Differences in changes of scores between groups were significant (p < .05), favoring the fluoxetine group for the scales of mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, physical functioning, and bodily pain. Improvements observed in the fluoxetine group were both clinically and socially significant.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas/psicologia , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/uso terapêutico , Avaliação Geriátrica , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Fluoxetina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inventário de Personalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol ; 21(1): 62-4, 1991 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1898118

RESUMO

Mercury vapors are released from paint containing mercury compounds used to prolong the shelf-life of interior latex paint. To determine whether homes recently painted with paint containing mercury had elevated indoor-air mercury concentrations, we studied 37 Ohio homes. Twenty-one homes painted with mercury-containing paint a median of 86 days earlier were compared with 16 homes not recently painted with mercury-containing paint. Paint samples from the exposed homes contained a median of 210 mg Hg/L (range 120-610 mg/L). The median air mercury concentration was higher in the exposed homes (0.3 microgram/m3; range nondetectable--1.5 microgram/m3) than in the unexposed homes (nondetectable; range nondetectable--0.3 microgram/m3, P less than 0.0001). Among the exposed homes there were seven in which paint containing less than 200 mg/L had been applied. In these homes, the median air mercury concentration was 0.2 microgram/m3 (range nondetectable--1 microgram/m3). Six (33%) exposed homes had air mercury concentrations greater than 0.5 microgram/m3, the acceptable indoor concentration recommended by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Elemental mercury was the form of mercury released into the air. These data demonstrate that potentially hazardous mercury exposure may occur in homes recently painted with paint that contains mercury concentrations less than 200 mg/L.


Assuntos
Poluição do Ar/análise , Habitação , Mercúrio/análise , Pintura , Humanos , Espectrofotometria Atômica
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...