Respiratory Epithelial Adenomatoid Hamartoma is Frequent in Olfactory Cleft After Nasalization.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the site and histopathology of polyps at the first revision surgery for recurrent nasal polyposis (NP) after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalization). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 62 patients having undergone revision surgery for recurrent NP after nasalization were included. The site and histology of the recurrence of polyps were analyzed according to operative and pathological reports. RESULTS: Histology showed classical inflammatory nasal polyps (CINP) in 91% of nasal cavities at primary surgery versus respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma (REAH) or REAH associated to CINP in 54.8% at revision surgery (P < .0001). Polyps were principally observed in the ethmoidal complex in 70% of nasal cavities during primary surgery and in the olfactory clefts in 88.7% during revision surgery (P < .0001). The mean interval between nasalization and first revision surgery was 8.8 ± 4.4 years (0.4-21.7 years). This interval was significantly shorter for grade 3 polyps, polyps removed from both ethmoidal complex and olfactory cleft at primary surgery, association of CINP and REAH at primary surgery, and when primary surgery had preserved the middle turbinates. CONCLUSION: Polyp recurrences after nasalization were mainly observed in the olfactory clefts and can be different histological features: inflammatory polyps, respiratory epithelial adenomatoid hamartoma, or a combination of both. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2098-2104, 2020.

Auditory fatigue among call dispatchers working with headsets.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether call center dispatchers wearing headsets are subject to auditory fatigue at the end of a work shift. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was gathered at times when call centers were busiest. All call operators wore a headset for up to 12 h. Acoustic environment and noise exposure under the headset were continuously recorded during the entire work shift. Variations in auditory parameters were assessed using pure-tone air-conduction audiometry and an objective test based on distortion product otoacoustic emissions - contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes (EchoScan test). Thirty-nine operators and 16 controls, all volunteers, were selected from 3 call centers (sales, assistance, and emergency) where all cognitive tasks were accomplished by phone and on computers. RESULTS: No acoustic shock was detected during the investigation. The highest normalized noise exposure (daily noise exposure level - LEX,8 h) measured was 75.5 dBA. No significant variation in auditory performances was detected with either pure-tone air-conduction audiometry or the EchoScan test. Nevertheless, dispatchers expressed a feeling of tiredness. CONCLUSIONS: For an equivalent diffuse field noise exposure, the use of a headset does not seem to worsen auditory fatigue for call center operators. The dispatcher's fatigue was probably due to the duration of the work shift or to the tasks they performed rather than to the noise exposure under a headset. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(2):217-226.

Bronchial or Laryngeal Obstruction Induced by Exercise?

A child suspected of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction and asthma is examined by laryngoscopy and respiratory resistance (Rrs) after exercise challenge. Immediately at exercise cessation, the visualized adduction of the larynx in inspiration is reflected in a paroxystic increase in Rrs. While normal breathing has apparently resumed later on during recovery from exercise, the pattern of Rrs in inspiration is observed to reoccur following a deep breath or swallowing. The procedure may thus help diagnosing the site of exercise-induced obstruction when laryngoscopy is not available and identify re-inducers of laryngeal dysfunction.

Relationship between 18FDG-PET and different types of sinonasal malignancies.

CONCLUSION: The sensitivity and specificity of a 18FDG-PET scan may be different according to the histology. The SUVmax and SUV ratio may reflect the tumor's aggressive behavior. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of PET/CT scans, including the maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax), at initial diagnosis according to six main types of sinonasal malignancies: sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), sinonasal malignant melanoma (SMM), olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC). METHODS: A chart review of 50 patients who were diagnosed and treated for six sinonasal malignancy types over a period of 6 years was conducted. Any 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for each patient were searched using the hospital's intranet. The SUVmax of the primary sinonasal site was recorded. The liver SUVs were utilized as reference SUVs. The SUV ratio was defined as the ratio of the SUVmax of the primary tumor and the SUVliver. RESULTS: The most common malignancy was SNAC (32%), followed by SNUC (24%), ONB (14%), ACC (10%), SMM (10%), and SNEC (10%). The SUVmax and SUV ratio values were significantly different between tumor types (p = 0.002 and 0.012, respectively). SNUC had the highest mean SUVmax (14.2), followed by SNAC (9.9). A similar mean SUVmax was observed for SMM, ONB, and ACC (∼ 7.0). SNEC up-takes the least 18FDG among these six tumor types (mean SUVmax = 4.7).

Can surgeons predict the olfactory outcomes after endoscopic surgery for nasal polyposis?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to identify predictors for olfactory outcomes in patients with nasal polyposis (NP) after surgery on the ethmoidal labyrinths, either with or without resection of the polyps of the olfactory cleft (OC). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Ninety-six patients endoscopically operated on for NP were enrolled in this study. Olfactory measurements were performed 1 day prior to surgery and 6 weeks after surgery, using odor thresholds and identification tests of the Sniffin' Sticks kit and a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale. The multivariate logistic regression model was also used to assess independent predictors for olfactory outcomes after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with preoperative normosmia demonstrated normal olfactory function 6 weeks after surgery. Out of 69 patients with preoperative hypo-anosmia, 33 patients (47.83%) improved their olfactory function after surgery on the basis of the Sniffin' Sticks results. History of previous sinus surgery was reported by 77.78% of patients without olfactory improvement and by 51.52% with olfactory improvement (P = .022). By multivariate analysis, history of previous sinus surgery for NP remained a strong predictor of poor olfactory outcomes after surgery (adjusted odds ratio = 4.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-13.32, P = .017). Histopathological types of lesions inside the OC as well as the resection of moderate/big lesions in the OC were not predictors of olfactory outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The more previous sinus surgeries, the smaller the chance for patients to recover their olfactory function after each surgical revision.