Sex, Gender, and Women's Heart Health: How Women's Heart Programs Address the Knowledge Gap.

This article aims to bridge existing knowledge gaps that impact clinical cardiovascular care and outcomes for women in Canada. The authors discuss various aspects of women's heart health, emphasizing the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in promoting women's well-being. The article also identifies the impact of national women's heart health campaigns and the value of peer support in improving outcomes. The article addresses the particular risks that women face, such as pregnancy-related complications and hormone replacement therapy, all of which are associated with cardiovascular events, and highlights the differences in ischemic symptoms between men and women. Despite improvements in acute event outcomes, challenges persist in accessing timely ambulatory care, particularly for women. Canada has responded to these challenges by introducing Women Heart Programs, which offer tailored programs, support groups, and specialized testing. However, these programs remain few in number and are found only in urban settings. Overall, this review identifies sex and gender factors related to women's heart health, underscoring the importance of specialized programs and multidisciplinary care in improving women's cardiovascular health.

Cet article vise à répondre aux incertitudes actuelles qui se répercutent sur les soins cardiovasculaires et les issues cliniques chez les femmes au Canada. Les auteurs abordent différents aspects de la santé cardiaque des femmes, mettant l'accent sur l'efficacité des soins multidisciplinaires pour améliorer le bien-être des femmes. L'article présente également l'effet des campagnes nationales sur la santé cardiaque des femmes et l'importance de l'entraide entre collègues pour améliorer les résultats. L'article traite des risques particuliers touchant les femmes, comme les complications liées à la grossesse et l'hormonothérapie substitutive, qui sont toutes associées à des événements cardiovasculaires, et il souligne les différences entre les hommes et les femmes pour ce qui est des symptômes ischémiques. Bien que des améliorations aient été observées quant à l'issue des événements aigus, des difficultés persistent sur le plan de l'accès rapide à des soins ambulatoires, surtout pour les femmes. Le Canada a répondu à ces difficultés en créant des programmes pour la santé cardiaque des femmes, qui offrent des services adaptés, des groupes de soutien et des analyses spécialisées. Cependant, ils sont encore peu nombreux et accessibles seulement en milieu urbain. Dans l'ensemble, cette analyse définit les facteurs liés au sexe et au genre qui interviennent dans la santé cardiaque des femmes, soulignant l'importance de mettre en place des programmes spécialisés et des soins multidisciplinaires pour améliorer la santé cardiovasculaire des femmes.

One-Year Prospective Follow-up of Women With INOCA and MINOCA at a Canadian Women's Heart Centre.

BACKGROUND: Many women with cardiac chest pain and ischemia or myocardial infarction have no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA or MINOCA). Studies suggest that these patients have a decreased quality of life and are at increased risk of cardiovascular events. Our study reports 1-year quality of life, frequency of angina, and outcomes following entry into a multidisciplinary Women's Heart Centre (WHC). METHODS: Patients with INOCA and MINOCA completed questionnaires on baseline demographics and clinical presentation. At 1-year, frequency of chest pain, quality of life, depression and anxiety symptoms, and cardiovascular outcomes were reported and compared with baseline. RESULTS: A total of 154 women with nonobstructive coronary artery disease were included in this study (112 patients with INOCA and 42 with MINOCA). Median age was 59 years, and the most common referral was for chest pain (94% in INOCA and 66% in MINOCA). At baseline, 64% of patients with INOCA and 43% of patients with MINOCA did not have specific diagnoses. Following investigations in the WHC, 71.4% of patients with INOCA established a new or a changed diagnosis (most common was coronary microvascular dysfunction at 68%), whereas 60% of patients with MINOCA established new or changed diagnoses (the most common of which was coronary vasospasm at 60%). At 1-year, participants had significantly decreased chest pain, improved quality of life, and improved mental health. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary WHC significantly increases the yield of a specific diagnosis in patients with INOCA and MINOCA. Further, attending a WHC could significantly improve the clinical and psychological outcomes of women with INOCA and MINOCA.

Commentary: Respect in Nursing - Reflections.

Current research demonstrates that nurses still feel disrespected, particularly in the context of such an abundance of policy work and dialogue, emphasizing the importance of respect and the need for change. As Almost and Mildon (2022) note, specific recommendations such as baccalaureate entry to practice, leadership training and the publication of best practice guidelines have been implemented in abundance, further solidifying a feeling of futility. Adding my own experiences as a registered nurse, a nurse practitioner and now a nursing leader continually insisting on recognition of my education, worth and value further proves that our collective work to date has unfortunately not been enough.

Update on Management of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patient on Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been the cornerstone for the treatment of depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and panic disorder for a wide spectrum of age groups. Although the beneficial therapeutic properties are well recognized by the medical community, it also possesses many undesirable adverse effects with clinical manifestations. Some of the effects can be severe. This chapter highlights use of SSRIs, the mechanism of action, medication dosages, common drug to drug interactions, and recommendations on management of the oral and maxillofacial surgery patient on SSRIs.

Pooling in a Pod: A Strategy for COVID-19 Testing to Facilitate a Safe Return to School.

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted widespread closures of primary and secondary schools. Routine testing of asymptomatic students and staff members, as part of a comprehensive mitigation program, can help schools open safely. "Pooling in a pod" is a public health surveillance strategy whereby testing cohorts (pods) are based on social relationships and physical proximity. Pooled testing provides a single laboratory test result for the entire pod, rather than a separate result for each person in the pod. During the 2020-2021 school year, an independent preschool-grade 12 school in Washington, DC, used pooling in a pod for weekly on-site point-of-care testing of all staff members and students. Staff members and older students self-collected anterior nares samples, and trained staff members collected samples from younger students. Overall, 12 885 samples were tested in 1737 pools for 863 students and 264 staff members from November 30, 2020, through April 30, 2021. The average pool size was 7.4 people. The average time from sample collection to pool test result was 40 minutes. The direct testing cost per person per week was $24.24, including swabs. During the study period, 4 surveillance test pools received positive test results for COVID-19. A post-launch survey found most parents (90.3%), students (93.4%), and staff members (98.8%) were willing to participate in pooled testing with confirmatory tests for pool members who received a positive test result. The proportion of students in remote learning decreased by 62.2% for students in grades 6-12 (P < .001) and by 92.4% for students in preschool to grade 5 after program initiation (P < .001). Pooling in a pod is a feasible, cost-effective surveillance strategy that may facilitate safe, sustainable, in-person schooling during a pandemic.

The Psychological Well-Being of Medical Versus Dental GME Residents During the COVID 19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: Trainees are facing isolation and burnout, due to the fear of contracting and transmitting novel coronavirus-19 (COVID-19). There has been a reduction in clinical activities of residents. The purpose of this paper is to measure and compare the psychological well-being of dental versus medical residents during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study whereby trainees of a hospital in New York City were sent a questionnaire. Participants were from the dental and medical departments. Psychological measures of depression and post traumatic stress disorder were assessed utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) questionnaire. Other variables compared were age, gender, smoking status, living situation and comorbidities. Data analysis utilized chi-squared (X2) and t-tests. Bivariate correlation and linear regression analyses were also utilized. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 19 dental (Dental) and 171 medical (MD) residents. There were 66 participants. The response rate was 63.16 and 35.09% for the Dental and MD residents, respectively. The mean age for the Dental and MD residents, respectively, was 29.62 ± 2.09 and 34.82 ± 9.32 (P = .014). Eighty-one percent of the Dental respondents were male and 33.3% of the MD respondents were male (P < .001). The mean PHQ-9 score was 18.29 ± 2.88 vs 7.24 ± 7.41 for Dental and MD residents, respectively (P < .001). A higher score represents increased severity of depression. The Dental residents scored 61.9 ± 3.90 on the IES-R vs 30.36 ± 24.67 (P < .001). A higher score indicates a greater frequency of intrusive thoughts and avoidance. Forty-two percent of Dental and 13.3% of MD residents tested positive; 25% of Dental and 28.9% of MD residents self-reported symptoms for COVID-19. Being positive or symptomatic resulted in statistically significant higher IES-R and PHQ-9 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Dental residents and being positive or symptomatic for COVID-19 resulted in higher PHQ-9 and IES-R scores. Being aware of the impact of COVID-19 is an important step in providing intervention.

Management of Oroantral Communications.

Oroantral communication and fistula are commonly seen complications in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral surgeons must be familiar with the diagnosis and proper management including multiple soft and hard tissue approaches to this surgical dilemma.

Update on Maxillary Sinus Augmentation.

Implant stability is critical to implant success, and the amount of available bone is vital to achieving that end. Because of low-lying maxillary sinuses, adequate alveolar height on the posterior maxilla is often lacking in many patients in need of implant replacement. This chapter reviews both the traditional lateral sinus lift maxillary approach to achieve vertical augmentation as well as the transcrestal osteotome intraoral approach. A discussion of osseodensification will also be mentioned as an alternative approach.

Letter to the Editor.

Thank you for initiating an important conversation regarding NCLEX-RN implementation and experience in Canada. We are three nursing leaders in the province of British Columbia (BC) with continued interest in the governance, regulation and contribution of nursing locally, provincially and nationally. We hold or have held senior policy positions in BC, including in roles responsible for nursing regulation and practice. It is not our intent to replay the past in relation to the exam; rather, our commentary is intended to position the discourse in the broader context of practice regulation and the roles/responsibilities of regulators in our country.

Oral Manifestation of Systemic Diseases.

The US Surgeon General's report Oral Health in America highlighted ways in which oral health and systemic conditions are associated with each other. An oral examination can reveal signs and symptoms associated with systemic diseases. In this article, multiple systemic diseases including but not limited to viral and immune modulated conditions and associated oral symptoms are discussed.

Exploring women's health care experiences through an equity lens: Findings from a community clinic serving marginalised women.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore how marginalised women perceive and rate equity-oriented health care at a primary care clinic using items that evaluate patients' experiences of care. BACKGROUND: Despite an increased recognition of the importance of health care that is equity-oriented, and that understands the patient within the context of the broader social determinants of health, inequities in health remain prevalent around the world. DESIGN: Items from the "EQUIP Primary Health Care" research programme were used to explore patients' experiences of equity-oriented health care. Women were invited to complete the questionnaire with the explicit aim of gaining their input to improve quality of care at the clinic. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement was followed for the study. METHODS: Sixty-seven women who experienced significant health and social inequities, and were seeking care at a women's only nurse practitioner primary health care clinic in Canada, were invited to complete the questionnaire. For quality improvement purposes, correlational analyses were used to explore women's experiences of care. RESULTS: Women's responses showed that Promote Emotional Safety and Trust and Overall Quality of Care were the most highly correlated domains, indicating the importance of the health care team in establishing trusting relationships, particularly for women who experience stigma and negative judgement when seeking care. CONCLUSION: Seeking feedback from patients on their experiences of care using items developed to explicitly tap into equity issues is useful in understanding how patients experience equity-oriented health care. Responses from the women highlight the importance of understanding not only the what of equity-oriented care but also the how. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results of this study illustrate the importance of establishing trusting relationships, tailoring care, and using a nondiscriminatory approach when working with women who experience negative judgements when seeking care.

Silent Sinus Syndrome: Interesting Clinical and Radiologic Findings.

Silent sinus syndrome (SSS) describes enophthalmos and hypoglobus in association with disease of the maxillary sinus. This syndrome has rarely been presented in the dental literature. Many dentists are not familiar with the syndrome and its associated clinical and radiologic features. A 57-year-old female patient presented to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Outpatient Clinic at The Brooklyn Hospital Center for a routine dental examination. During this examination, she indicated that she felt her right eye had been sinking. Routine dental panoramic radiography showed opacification on the right maxillary sinus. Maxillofacial computed tomography showed a small maxillary sinus with retraction of the sinus walls. The floor of the orbit was thinned, causing hypoglobus. Obstruction of the right ostiomeatal complex was noted, with complete opacification of the right maxillary sinus. A diagnosis of SSS was made. SSS usually occurs in individuals in the third to fifth decade of life. It presents with enopthalmos and hypoglobus. On imaging, a small and opacified maxillary sinus is visualized with retraction of the orbital floor and a blocked ostiomeatal complex. Management includes functional endoscopic sinus surgery. The orbital floor can be reconstructed during the same operation, at a later date, or not at all. Knowledge about SSS can lead to prompt diagnosis and treatment recommendations while avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Embracing Our "Otherness".

Theories on the importance of holistic and spiritual healing within nonconventional models of care are vast, yet there is little written about the practical, clinical-level interventions required to deliver such practices in collaborative cross-cultural settings. This article describes the learning experiences and transformative journeys of non-Indigenous nurse practitioners working with a Cultural Lead from an Indigenous community in British Columbia, Canada. The goal of the Seven Sisters Healthy Heart Project was to improve heart health promotion in an Indigenous community through a model of knowledge translation. The article describes the development of a bridge between two cultures in an attempt to deliver culturally responsive programming. Our journeys are represented in a phenomenological approach regarding relationships, pedagogy, and expertise. We were able to find ways to balance two worlds-the medical health services model and Indigenous holistic models of healing. The key to building the bridge was our willingness to be vulnerable, to trust in each other's way of teaching and learning, and allowing diverse viewpoints and knowledge sources to be present. Our work has vast implications for health promotion in Indigenous communities, as it closes the gap between theory and practice by demonstrating how Indigenous models can be integrated into mainstream health promotion practices.

Women-Centered and Culturally Responsive Heart Health Promotion Among Indigenous Women in Canada.

Most women in Canada confront a combination of bio-psychosocial factors that put them at risk for cardiovascular disease. The challenge for health planners is to address these factors while contextualizing interventions that meet the specific needs of particular social and cultural groupings. The article will discuss a women-centered, group-based heart health pilot initiative designed to engage with indigenous approaches to healing. The nurse practitioners co-led the group with a representative from the indigenous community to balance women-centered practices with more traditional and culturally appropriate ones. In particular, indigenous processes, such as a Talking Circle, combined with indigenous knowledge/content were integrated into the pilot program. The project was evaluated to investigate its outcomes (how the intervention impacted the participants) and processes (how participants perceived the intervention). Evaluation involved analysis of the Talking Circle's content, a focus group, field observations, and self-completed surveys. Most women made changes regarding their diet, some began physical activities, and others focused on better managing their emotional health. Women viewed the group as successful because it embraced both women-centered and culturally appropriate health promotion practices. The intervention created a culturally safe space for learning and transformation. The findings confirm the need for employing culturally relevant, gender-specific approaches to heart health promotion that are situated in and responsive to community needs.

Nurse practitioners in postoperative cardiac surgery: are they effective?

BACKGROUND: High demand for acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) in Canadian postoperative cardiac surgery settings has outpaced methodologically rigorous research to support the role. PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of ACNP-led care to hospitalist-led care in a postoperative cardiac surgery unit in a Canadian, university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Patients scheduled for urgent or elective coronary artery bypass and/or valvular surgery were randomly assigned to either ACNP-led (n=22) or hospitalist-led (n=81) postoperative care. Both ACNPs and hospitalists worked in collaboration with a cardiac surgeon. Outcome variables included length of hospital stay, hospital readmission rate, postoperative complications, adherence to follow-up appointments, attendance at cardiac rehabilitation and both patient and health care team satisfaction. RESULTS: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups except more patients in the ACNP-led group had had surgery on an urgent basis (p < or = 0.01), and had undergone more complicated surgical procedures (p < or =0.01). After discharge, more patients in the hospitalist-led group had visited their family doctor within a week (p < or =0.02) and measures of satisfaction relating to teaching, answering questions, listening and pain management were higher in the ACNP-led group. CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS: Although challenges in recruitment yielded a lower than anticipated sample size, this study contributes to our knowledge of the ACNP role in postoperative cardiac surgery. Our findings provide support for the ACNP role in this setting as patients who received care from an ACNP had similar outcomes to hospitalist-led care and reported greater satisfaction in some measures of care.