Challenges and Opportunities of Using a National Database to Evaluate Racial/Ethnic Disparities and Breastfeeding Effects on Sudden Unexpected Infant Death.

Background: Sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) rates remain higher in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) infants than other demographic groups. Racial disparities are also evident in breastfeeding, which is associated with reduced risk of SUID. Objective: To assess the relationship between racial/ethnic disparities in SUID and breastfeeding beyond the newborn period using U.S. nationally reported public databases. Methods: Data were extracted from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) and the National Immunization Surveys (NISs) 2009-2017. WONDER data were restricted to full-term infants and sorted by death year, race/ethnicity, and other characteristics. NIS breastfeeding data included ever breastfed, breastfed at 6 months, and exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months. Breastfeeding rates and mortality data were aggregated based on race/ethnicity, and mortality rates were analyzed by weighted (number of births) multivariable linear regression. Results: SUID rates were highest among NHB and AI/AN infants who also had the lowest breastfeeding rates. When breastfeeding and race/ethnicity were included in the analyses, race/ethnicity confounded the relationship between breastfeeding and SUID. When race was excluded, ever breastfeeding and any breastfeeding at 6 months were associated with significantly decreased SUID rates. Conclusion: Race/ethnicity confounded the relationship between breastfeeding and SUID. Analysis was limited because individual SUID rates were available for maternal/birth characteristics but not for breastfeeding. Our study showed a need for adding additional data points to other national databases to better understand the role that breastfeeding plays in the racial/ethnic disparities in SUID.

Maternal and Infant Outcomes Associated with Maternity Practices Related to COVID-19: The COVID Mothers Study.

Background: Maternity care practices such as skin-to-skin care, rooming-in, and direct breastfeeding are recommended, but it is unclear if these practices increase the risk of clinically significant COVID-19 in newborns, and if disruption of these practices adversely affects breastfeeding. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 357 mothers and their infants <12 months who had confirmed or suspected COVID-19. Subjects came from an anonymous worldwide online survey between May 4 and September 30, 2020, who were recruited through social media, support groups, and health care providers. Using multivariable logistic regression, Fisher's exact test, and summary statistics, we assessed the association of skin-to-skin care, feeding, and rooming-in with SARS-CoV-2 outcomes, breastfeeding outcomes, and maternal distress. Results: Responses came from 31 countries. Among SARS-CoV-2+ mothers whose infection was ≤3 days of birth, 7.4% of their infants tested positive. We found a nonsignificant decrease in risk of hospitalization among neonates who roomed-in, directly breastfed, or experienced uninterrupted skin-to-skin care (p > 0.2 for each). Infants who did not directly breastfeed, experience skin-to-skin care, or who did not room-in within arms' reach, were significantly less likely to be exclusively breastfed in the first 3 months, adjusting for maternal symptoms (p ≤ 0.02 for each). Nearly 60% of mothers who experienced separation reported feeling "very distressed," and 29% who tried to breastfeed were unable. Presence of maternal symptoms predicted infant transmission or symptoms (adjusted odds ratio = 4.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.52-13.26, p = 0.006). Conclusion: Disruption of evidence-based quality standards of maternity care is associated with harm and may be unnecessary.