Hemoglobin A1c as a Predictor of Surgical Site Infection in Patients With Orthopaedic Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research involving diabetes mellitus (DM), glycemic control, and complications in orthopaedic patients has primarily focused on elective procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate hemoglobin A1c (A1c) as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with orthopaedic trauma. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older treated surgically for an acute fracture by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon at a single academic tertiary referral center with a laboratory value for A1c available within 3 months of their surgery were identified retrospectively. Postoperative SSI was defined according to 'Fracture related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group,' by Metsemakers et al. RESULTS: A total of 925 patients met criteria for analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated using A1c as a predictor for signs suggestive and confirmatory of SSI and demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.535 and 0.539, respectively. No significant difference was found in the rate of signs suggestive or confirmatory of SSI in patients with normal A1c levels (<6.5) compared with patients with A1c levels consistent with a diagnosis of DM (>6.5), P-value = 0.199 and P-value = 0.297, respectively. No significant difference was found in the rate of signs suggestive or confirmatory of SSI in patients with completely uncontrolled DM (A1c > 10) compared with patients with A1c levels <10, P-value 0.528 and P-value = 0.552, respectively. CONCLUSION: Existing literature has demonstrated an association with postoperative infection in orthopaedic patients who have elevated A1c values. In this cohort of patients with orthopaedic trauma, hemoglobin A1c was not a valuable tool to predict postoperative SSI. Given these findings, routine A1c monitoring is not a reliable predictor of SSI criteria in patients with orthopaedic trauma based on the current consensus definition of SSI in fracture surgery.

The Influence of Training Pathway, Institution Type, Gender, and a Global Pandemic on Post Graduation Career Plans in Plastic Surgery.

Background: Anecdotal statements are often made about what percentage of residents go into fellowship versus private practice versus academia after graduation. However, few objective studies have been completed on this topic. This project is designed to shed light on the career choices of plastic surgery residents immediately after graduation from 2018 to 2022. A secondary objective was to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic had any measurable impact on postgraduation plans. Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, publicly available data were obtained from institution websites or via program queries. Comparison between pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 (2018-2019 versus 2020-2022), integrated versus independent, and private versus public cohorts were analyzed using Fisher exact test. A two-sided P value less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Results: Data were collected for 690 graduates across 64 plastic surgery training programs. Responses were obtained from 60 of 88 (68%) integrated and 30 of 47 (64%) independent programs. Most graduates pursued fellowship training (61%), followed by private practice (28%), academic practice (5%), or military post (1%). Independent residents were more likely to pursue private practice (40% versus 26%, P = 0.001), whereas integrated residents were more likely to pursue fellowship (49% versus 70%, P < 0.0001). Public institution graduates were more likely to go into private practice (37% versus 23%, P = 0.0002), whereas private institution residents were more likely to pursue fellowship (55% versus 72%, P < 0.0001). Public institutions were more likely to graduate women (45% versus 35%, P = 0.009). The COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.31) had no impact on postgraduation plans. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that training pathway and institution type have a significant impact on postgraduation plans, whereas a global pandemic does not. This information can be used by educators, residents, and medical students as they plan for the future.