A prospective study on single-port versus multiport patient-reported surgical outcomes.

Introduction: We sought to determine potential patient reported advantages of the da Vinci single-port (SP) robotic system for urological procedures compared with the previous model, the da Vinci multiport (MP) system. The SP model utilizes a single 30 to 40 mm incision rather than multiple 5 to 22 mm incisions. This project aims to prospectively investigate the impact of the novel SP system on patient reported cosmetic and psychometric surgical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent uro-oncologic surgery by three urologists at the University of Illinois Chicago from April to November 2021. Study participants completed a Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire 20 and 90 days post-procedure. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire is a reliable measure of surgical scars that includes five subscales: Appearance, Symptoms, Consciousness, Satisfaction with Appearance, and Satisfaction with Symptoms. Higher scores represented worse reported outcomes. Results: On Postoperative Day 20, there were 77 responses (53 SP and 24 MP). Patients receiving SP procedures reported more favourable outcomes in terms of appearance, symptoms, consciousness, and pain medication. On Day 90, there were 37 responses (24 SP and 13 MP). Patients receiving SP procedures reported more favourable outcomes in terms of appearance. No significant differences were seen on Day 90 in terms of pain, medication, symptoms, consciousness, or satisfaction. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the superiority of the SP in patient reported cosmetic and pain outcomes on short- and long-term follow-up after uro-oncological surgical procedures. Symptomatic and cosmetic advantages are present at the 20 day follow-up, with better scar appearance being significant 90 days after surgery.

Patient Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory Eye Disease.

TITLE: Patient Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy for Chronic Inflammatory Eye Disease. PURPOSE: To investigate adherence rates to immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) for treatment of noninfectious inflammatory eye disease (IED), adherence and disease control, and factors associated with nonadherence. METHOD: Retrospective review of medical charts from 2015 to 2020 was conducted on patients with IED at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after initiation of IMT. RESULTS: Of 183 patients, adherence rates at 6 months and 1 year were 70% and 58% by 2 years. Eighty-two percent, 78%, and 65% of patients with disease quiescence were adherent at 6 months, 1 and 2 years, respectively. Adherent patients have 1.86 (95% CI 1.09, 3.20) times greater likelihood for disease control compared to nonadherent. Primary reason for nonadherence was patient self-discontinuation. No specific factors were associated with nonadherence. CONCLUSION: Patients on IMT for IED had steady adherence rates up to 1 year, with decreased adherence at 2 years. Adherence to IMT significantly correlates with disease quiescence.

Single-port Versus Multi-port Robotic-assisted Procedures From the Patient's Perspective: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The da Vinci SP® single-port system, differently from prior platforms, utilizes a single 2.5 cm incision to accommodate 1 flexible camera and 3 articulated robotic arms. Potential advantages include shorter hospitalization, improved cosmesis, and reduced postoperative pain. This project investigates the impact of the novel single-port system on cosmetic and psychometric patient assessment. METHODS: The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (a validated patient-reported outcomes measure for surgical scar) has been administered retrospectively to patients who underwent either an SP or Xi® urological procedure at a single center. Four domains were assessed: Appearance, Consciousness, Satisfaction With Appearance, and Satisfaction With Symptoms. Higher scores represent worse reported outcomes. RESULTS: Compared to 78 Xi procedure recipients (mean 15.28), 104 SP procedure recipients (mean 13.84) reported significantly better cosmetic scar appearance U(NSP=104, NMP=78) = 3,739 (P = .007) where U is the difference between the 2 rank totals, and NSP and NMP represent the number of single-port and multi-port procedure recipient respondents, respectively. Similarly, the SP cohort (mean 8.80) compared to the Xi group (mean 9.87) demonstrated significantly better consciousness of their surgical scar, U(NSP=104, NMP=78) = 3,329 (P = .045), and higher satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of their surgical scar, U(NSP=103, NMP=78) = 3,232 (P = .022), with the SP group (mean 11.35) attaining better scores than the Xi group (mean 12.54). No significant difference was found for "Satisfaction With Symptoms," U(NSP=103, NMP=78) = 3,969 (P = .88), despite the SP group (mean 6.58) attaining lower scores than the Xi group (mean 6.74). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates patients' favorable perception of SP versus XI surgery in terms of aesthetic outcomes. An ongoing study is investigating the relationship between cosmetic satisfaction and length of stay, postoperative pain, and narcotic use.