The Promise of Cilnidipine in Hypertension with Comorbidities: National Consensus Statement: National Consensus Group Comprises Cardiologists, Nephrologists, and Diabetologists from India in a National Meet at New Delhi held on 22nd May 2022.

The rapidly increasing burden of hypertension is responsible for premature deaths from cardiovascular disease (CVD), renal disease, and stroke, with a tremendous public health and financial burden. Hypertension detection, treatment, and control vary worldwide; it is still low, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). High blood pressure (BP) and CVD risk have a strong, linear, and independent association. They contribute to alarming numbers of all-cause and CVD deaths. A major culprit for increased hypertension is sympathetic activity, and further complications of hypertension are heart failure, ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke, and renal failure. Now, antihypertensive interventions have emerged as a global public health priority to reduce BP-related morbidity and mortality. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are highly effective vasodilators. and the most common drugs used for managing hypertension and CVD. Cilnidipine, with both L- and N-type calcium channel blocking activity, is a promising 4th generation CCB. It causes vasodilation via L-type calcium channel blockade and inhibits the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) via N-type calcium channel blockade. Cilnidipine, which acts as a dual L/N-type CCB, is linked to a reduced occurrence of pedal edema compared to amlodipine, which solely blocks L-type calcium channels. The antihypertensive properties of cilnidipine are very substantial, with low BP variability and long-acting properties. It is beneficial for hypertensive patients to deal with morning hypertension and for patients with abnormal nocturnal BP due to exaggerated sympathetic nerve activation. Besides its BP-lowering effect, it also exhibits organ protection via sympathetic nerve inhibition and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition; it controls heart rate and proteinuria. Reno-protective, neuroprotective, and cardioprotective effects of cilnidipine have been well-documented and demonstrated.

Result of the left bundle branch area pacing data collection registry, an international multicenter study of conduction system pacing with a Tendril STS 2088 stylet-driven lead.

INTRODUCTION: Left bundle branch area (LBBA) pacing (LBBAP) has been proposed as an alternative therapy option in patients indicated for cardiac pacing to treat bradycardia or heart failure. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of LBBAP in patients implanted with a Tendril 2088 stylet-driven lead. METHODS: The international retrospective data collection registry included 11 sites from 5 countries globally. Patients with attempted implants of the Tendril lead in the LBBA were followed for at least 6 months post the implant attempt. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious adverse events and the composite of LBBA capture threshold of ≤2.0 V and R-wave amplitudes ≥5 mV (or ≥value at implant), respectively. RESULTS: Of 221 patients with attempted implants of the Tendril 2088 lead in the LBBA, 91.4% (202/221) had successful implants for LBBAP. Regardless of the LBBAP implant success, all patients were followed for at least 6 months (8.7 ± 7.3 months). Baseline characteristics: 44% female, 84% ≥65 years old, 34% coronary artery disease, and 86% of primary indications for pacemaker implant. Both primary safety and effectiveness endpoints were met (freedom from LBBAP lead-related serious adverse device effects of 99.5% and electrical performance composite success rate of 93%). The capture thresholds in LBBAP at implant and 6 months were 0.8 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ± 0.1 ms and 0.8 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ± 0.1 ms. The rate of patients with capture threshold rise ≥1 V was 1.5% through 6 months. The R-wave amplitudes in LBBAP at implant and 6 months were 9.3 ± 3.2 mV and 10.6 ± 3.0 mV. CONCLUSIONS: This large multicenter study demonstrates that the stylet-driven Tendril™ STS 2088 lead is safe and effective for LBBAP with high success and low complication rates.

Expert Opinion on the Use of Novel Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation for the Primary Care Setting in India: A Literature Review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, is linked with substantial morbidity and mortality due to accompanying risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Patients with AF are at a five-fold higher risk of suffering from a stroke. Anticoagulation therapy, with either vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), is a standard approach to reduce the risk. Consultant physicians (CPs) in India are the primary point of contact for the majority of patients before they approach a specialist. The CPs may face challenges in screening and diagnosing AF patients. The apprehensions associated with managing AF patients with anticoagulants, further add to the challenges of a CP. This review aimed to identify the key decision points for the CPs to diagnose AF and initiate anticoagulation in patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) and bring to the table a simplified recommendation supported by expert opinion and guidelines for stroke prevention in NVAF patients.

Transition from narrow to wide QRS complex during sinus rhythm: What is the mechanism?

A Holter tracing showing transition from narrow QRS to wide QRS after a premature ventricular complex (PVC) during sinus rhythm is presented with explanation of the likely underlying mechanism.

Wilms tumor with Mulibrey Nanism: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Mulibrey-Nanism (Muscle-liver-brain-eye Nanism = dwarfism; MUL) is a rare genetic syndrome. The underlying TRIM37 mutation predisposes these children to develop tumors frequently. In the largest published series of MUL, 8% patients were reported to develop Wilms tumor (WT). The published literature lacks data regarding the best treatment protocol and outcome of this cohort of children with WT and MUL. We report here a 2-year-old boy with WT and MUL and present a review of literature on WT in MUL. CASE: Our patient had associated cardiac problems of atrial septal defect, atrial flutter and an episode of sudden cardiac arrest. We managed him successfully with chemotherapy, surgery and multi-speciality care. He is alive and in remission at follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSION: A total of 14 cases (including present case) of WT have been reported in MUL and treatment details were available for six cases. They were managed primarily with surgery, chemotherapy with/without radiotherapy, and all achieved remission. The outcome data is available only for two cases, one has been followed up till 15 years post treatment for WT and other is our patient.

His-bundle pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Effect on ECG parameters of repolarization.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by biventricular pacing (BiV) may worsen indices of ventricular repolarization. The impact of His bundle pacing (HBP) on repolarization is not well studied in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to compare the repolarization parameters in ECG between these two pacing modalities. METHODS: Baseline and post implant parameters of 20 patients who had undergone HBP were compared with 18 patients who underwent CRT (BiV) implantation. Repolarization parameters were monitored before implantation, within 24  hours and after 6 weeks of implantation. Patients were followed up till 6 months with clinical and echocardiographic parameters. RESULT: Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were similar in both groups. Significant differences were noted in QTc, Tp-e and Tp-e/QTc between HBP and CRT groups both on immediate post implant and after 6 weeks of implantation. Compared to pre-implantation,significant shortening of Tp-e and Tp-e/QTc was observed immediately (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 69.62 ± 12.92, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, p < 0.05) and after 6 weeks (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 66.08 ± 14.95, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.02, p < 0.05) in HBP implant (group A). However, these changes were not present in CRT cohort (group B). During a follow up of 6 months, NYHA class and LV function between two groups remain comparable. CONCLUSION: HBP is associated with significant reduction of Tp-e and Tp-e/QTc compared to CRT. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether this improvement in indices of repolarization is associated with reduction in clinical arrhythmic events or not.

Sudden unexpected improvement in the atrioventricular conduction. What is the mechanism?

The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) of a 79-year-old male patient with recurrent pre-syncope showed irregular sinus rhythm with constant PR interval and left bundle branch block (LBBB) with intermittently blocked P waves. The beat following the blocked P wave had a narrower QRS with a shorter PR interval. The phenomenon of bilateral bundle branch block explains the sudden improvement in the atrioventricular conduction.

Regularly irregular, regular and irregularly irregular - All at the same time!

An interesting case of dual tachycardia with coexisting atrial fibrillation and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia is presented wherein transient ventricular bigeminal rhythm was observed.

Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Poorly Responsive to Cardiac Resynchronization Device Therapy.

BACKGROUND: "Nonresponse" to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recognized, but definition(s) applied in practice, treatment(s), and their consequences are little known. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess nonresponse in the prospective, international, ADVANCE CRT registry (Advance Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry). METHODS: Each subject's response was assessed at 6 months post-implantation using site-specific definitions and compared with the independently derived clinical composite score (CCS). Treatment(s) and hospitalization(s) were tracked during the following 6 months. RESULTS: Of 1,524 subjects enrolled in 69 centers (68 ± 12 years of age, 32% female, ischemic disease 39%), 74.3% received CRT-defibrillator devices, using mainly quadripolar LV leads (75%) deployed laterally (78%). Indications for CRT were wider than past trials. Among 1,327 evaluable subjects, site-defined nonresponse was 20.0% (greater age, comorbidities, ischemic cardiomyopathy, non-left bundle branch block, and lower %CRT pacing vs. responders). Site definitions used mainly clinical criteria (echocardiography infrequently), and underestimated nonresponders by 35% compared with CCS (58% sensitivity vs. CCS). Overall, more site-defined nonresponders received treatment (55.9% vs. 38.3% of responders; p < 0.001) using medication changes and heart failure education, but device programming less frequently. Intensification of in-clinic/remote evaluations and involvement of heart failure specialists remained minimal. Remarkably, 44% of site-defined nonresponders received no additional treatment. Frequency and duration of hospitalizations, and death, among site-defined nonresponders was significantly higher than responders. CONCLUSIONS: A high incidence of CRT nonresponders persists despite good patient selection and LV lead position, but site identification methods have modest sensitivity. Following diagnosis, nonresponders are often passively managed, without specialty care, with poor outcome. ADVANCE CRT exposes a vulnerable group of heart failure patients. (Advance Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry [ADVANCE CRT]; NCT01805154).

Prevention of sudden cardiac death in athletes, sportspersons and marathoners in India.

The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in athletes is significantly lower than the general population. However, when SCD occurs in an athlete during sporting event or training, it sends shockwaves in the society and raises questions about cardiovascular effects of sports and exercise. This document reviews the causes and mechanism of SCD in sports and exercise in young and older athletes. In the Indian context, we suggest a 'pre-participation screening' of young and older athletes and consider a 'supervised, graded exercise regime' for the uninitiated, older sports participant. Finally, the document proposes medical infrastructure required to successfully revive a victim of sudden cardiac arrest during a sporting event.

Clinical safety and performance of a MRI conditional pacing system in patients undergoing cardiac MRI.

BACKGROUND: Utilization of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) as an imaging modality in clinical practice is rapidly increasing. More evidence from randomized studies establishing clinical safety and performance of pacing systems in patients undergoing a cMRI scan is needed. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective, multicenter, randomized study was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing systems (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) in patients undergoing cMRI scan. METHODS: Patients (n  =  283) indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implant were randomized to either the MRI Group (MG) (n  =  140) or the Control Group (CG) (n  =  143) after successful device implantation of the Accent MRI™ system. Clinical evaluation and device interrogation were performed at pre- and post-MRI scan, and 1 month post-MRI for all patients. At 9-12 weeks postimplant, patients in MG underwent a nondiagnostic cMRI scan at 1.5 Tesla (T), while patients in CG underwent device interrogation and clinical evaluation twice with a 45-minute waiting period in between. The safety endpoint was freedom from MRI scan-related complications and that for efficacy was significant changes in right atrial/ventricular capture threshold and sensing amplitude between right before MRI, immediately after MRI, and 1 month post-MRI. RESULTS: Results showed 100% freedom from MRI scan-related complications. There were no significant changes in device performance between pre-MRI scan and 1 month post-MRI scan time points in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: cMRI scanning with 1.5 T scanners is safe in patients implanted with the Accent MRI™ conditional pacing system and has no significant effect on the electrical parameters of the device and leads.