Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway.

Several studies have shown that attendance rates are lower among non-Western immigrants than among natives. As the Nordic countries have quite similar health systems and populations but also differences in the organisation of their organised mammography screening programmes, differences in attendance rates could highlight organisational factors that might increase the attendance rates. Mammography screening is offered free of charge in Denmark and Finland, but not in Iceland and Norway. Contrarily to the other countries, Iceland do not send out pre-booked appointment. The study population included natives and non-Western immigrants aged 50-69 years, who had at least one invitation to the national mammography screening programmes in Denmark (2008-2017), Finland (2001-2017), Iceland (2001-2020) or Norway (2001-2015). Relative risks (RRs) of attendance were estimated and adjusted for age group and calendar period. The study population included 116.033 non-Western immigrants and more than 2 million natives. The attendance rates were significantly lower among non-Western immigrants than among natives, with an adjusted relative risk of 0.81/0.80 in Denmark and Finland, 0.62 in Norway, and 0.40 in Iceland. The lower attendance rates among immigrants in Norway and Iceland did not seem to be due to differences in birth country, immigration age, or educational level, but might be explained by organisational factors. Offering free-of-charge mammography screening in Norway and Iceland and/or including a pre-booked appointment in the invitation letters in Iceland might increase the attendance rate among non-Western immigrants.

Overall survival and causes of death in elderly patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a Norwegian population-based case-control study.

Elderly Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients are poorly characterized and underrepresented in studies. In this national population-based study, we investigated cause-specific survival using competing-risk analysis in elderly HL patients compared to the normal population. Patients ≥ 60 years diagnosed between 2000-2015 were identified by Cancer Registry of Norway, records reviewed in detail and compared to data from Norwegian Cause of Death Registry for patients and cancer-free controls. Of 492 patients, 81 (17%) were ineligible for treatment directed specifically towards HL, mostly because of an underlying other lymphoma entity, whereas 74 (15%) and 337 (69%) were treated with palliative or curative intent, respectively. Median overall survival in patients ineligible for assessment of HLdirected therapies was 0.5 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.6), and for palliatively and curatively treated patients 0.8 (0.4-1.2) and 9.1 (7.5-10.7) years, respectively. After correction of discrepancies in registry data, with 359 deaths, 108 (30%) died of HL, the most common cause of death. In curatively treated patients, treatment-related mortality was 6.5% and the risk-difference of dying from HL compared to controls was 28% (95% CI 23-33%) after 10 years. These numbers indicate disease control in a majority of elderly patients eligible for curative treatment, compared to risk-differences for death from HL of 59% (48-71%) and 42% (31-53%) after 10 years in the palliative and ineligible groups, respectively. There was an increased risk of dying from hematological malignancies other than HL in all groups, but not from other competing causes of death, showing no excess mortality from long-term treatment complications.

Lower participation among immigrants in colorectal cancer screening in Norway.

Introduction: Organized cancer screening programs should be equally accessible for all groups in society. We assessed differences in participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among different immigrant groups. Methods: Between 2012 and 2019, 140,000 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomly invited to sigmoidoscopy or repeated faecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a CRC screening trial. In this study, we included 46,919 individuals invited to sigmoidoscopy and 70,018 invited to the first round of FIT between 2012 and 2017. We examined difference in participation between non-immigrants and immigrants, and within different immigrant groups by geographic area of origin, using logistic regression models, adjusted for several sociodemographic factors and health factors. Results: In total, we included 106,695 non-immigrants and 10,242 immigrants. The participation rate for FIT was 60% among non-immigrants, 58% among immigrants from Western countries and 37% among immigrants from non-Western countries. The participation rate for sigmoidoscopy was 53% among non-immigrants, 48% among immigrants from Western countries and 23% among immigrants from non-Western countries. Compared to non-immigrants, multivariate adjusted odds ratio for non-participation in FIT screening was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.23) and 1.82 (1.69-1.96) for immigrants from Western and non-Western countries. The corresponding numbers in sigmoidoscopy screening were 1.34 (1.21-1.48) and 2.83 (2.55-3.14). The lowest participation was observed in immigrants from Eastern Europe, Northern Africa and Western Asia, and South-Central Asia. Conclusion: Participation in CRC screening in Norway was particularly low among non-Western immigrants, which could put them at increased risk for late stage diagnosis of CRC. Participation was lower in sigmoidoscopy screening than in FIT screening, especially among immigrants from non-Western countries.

Effect of invitation letter in language of origin on screening attendance: randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen Norway.

OBJECTIVE: To explore attendance at organised mammographic screening among immigrant groups that received an invitation letter and information leaflet (invitation) in their language of origin and Norwegian compared with Norwegian only. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Population based screening programme for breast cancer in Norway (BreastScreen Norway), which invites women aged 50-69 to two-view mammographic screening biennially. PARTICIPANTS: All women invited to BreastScreen Norway in the study period April 2021 to June 2022 whose language of origin was Arabic (women born in Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, or Morocco), English (women born in the Philippines), Polish (women born in Poland), Somali (women born in Somalia), or Urdu (women born in Pakistan) (n=11 347). INTERVENTION: The study group received an invitation to screening in their language of origin and in Norwegian, whereas the control group received an invitation in Norwegian only during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Attendance at BreastScreen Norway during the study period. RESULTS: Overall attendance was 46.5% (2642/5683) in the study group and 47.4% (2682/5664) in the control group. No statistical differences in attendance were observed after stratification by language of invitation, age at invitation, or years since immigration. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in attendance was observed between immigrant women invited to BreastScreen Norway in their language of origin and in Norwegian compared with Norwegian only. Several barriers to cancer screening may exist among immigrants, and translating the invitation is probably only a part of a complex explanation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04672265. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04672265.

Early screening outcomes among non-immigrants and immigrants targeted by BreastScreen Norway, 2010-2019.

AIMS: This study aimed to analyse results on early screening outcomes, including recall and cancer rates, and histopathological tumour characteristics among non-immigrants and immigrants invited to BreastScreen Norway. METHODS: We included information about 2, 763,230 invitations and 2,087,222 screening examinations from 805,543 women aged 50-69 years who were invited to BreastScreen Norway between 2010 and 2019. Women were stratified into three groups based on their birth country: non-immigrants, immigrants born in Western countries and immigrants born in non-Western countries. Age-adjusted regression models were used to analyse early screening outcomes. A random intercept effect was included in models where women underwent several screening examinations. RESULTS: The overall attendance was 77.5% for non-immigrants, 68% for immigrants from Western countries and 51.5% for immigrants from non-Western countries. The rate of screen-detected cancers was 5.9/1000 screening examinations for non-immigrants, 6.3/1000 for immigrants from Western countries and 5.1/1000 for immigrants from non-Western countries. Adjusted for age, the rate did not differ statistically between the groups (p=0.091). The interval cancer rate was 1.7/1000 screening examinations for non-immigrants, 2.4/1000 for immigrants from Western countries and 1.6/1000 for non-Western countries (p<0.001). Histological grade was less favourable for screen-detected cancers, and subtype was less favourable for interval cancers among immigrants from non-Western countries versus non-immigrants. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in age-adjusted rate of screen-detected cancer among non-immigrants and immigrants from Western countries or non-Western countries among women attending BreastScreen Norway between 2010 and 2019. Small but clinically relevant differences in histopathological tumour characteristics were observed between the three groups.

Polish immigrants' access to colorectal cancer screening in Norway - a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme started in May 2022. Inequities in uptake of CRC screening is a concern, and we expect that immigrants are at risk of non-uptake. Immigrants from Poland are the most populous immigrant group in Norway. The purpose of this study was to identify and explore factors that may facilitate Polish immigrants' access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was based on qualitative interviews with ten Polish immigrants in Norway. The participants represented a convenience sample that varied in terms of gender, education, employment, time in Norway, place of residence, Norwegian language skills and ties to the Norwegian-Polish community. We performed thematic content analysis to understand CRC screening from the perspective of Polish immigrants, using transnationalism and Levesque's conceptualization of accessibility as theoretical frameworks. RESULTS: We grouped our findings into three themes; "understanding of CRC development and the need to access health care", "binationalism" and "improving accessibility through information". Within these themes, various factors influenced the participants' accessibility to CRC screening, namely knowledge about the screening and about causes, development and prevention of the disease, language, choice of screening country, trust in health personnel's competence, information needs, methods and sources, as well as participants' perception of the faecal immunochemical test screening user manual. These factors were further influenced by communication between the Polish community in Norway and Poland, as well as travel between the countries. CONCLUSION: We identified several factors that can be targeted with an aim to increase Polish immigrants' access to the Norwegian CRC screening programme. Effective measures could include increasing cultural competence among health care providers and providing information in Polish through Polish-speaking health care professionals, general practitioners and internet portals used by the Polish-speaking community. Focusing on accessibility in a transnational setting, our findings may be of interest for policy makers and service providers planning preventive health measures for immigrants.

Attendance in BreastScreen Norway among immigrant and Norwegian-born women. / Oppmøte i Mammografiprogrammet blant innvandrere og norskfødte kvinner.

BACKGROUND: Women residing in Oslo have had lower attendance in BreastScreen Norway than the national average. We explored attendance in BreastScreen Norway among immigrant versus Norwegian-born women in Oslo, compared to other counties in Norway. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We linked attendance data from BreastScreen Norway to sociodemographic data from Statistics Norway for 885 979 women offered mammographic screening in the period 1996-2015. We undertook descriptive analyses of attendance in the different counties for the group of invitees as a whole, and for Norwegian-born and immigrants by country of birth ('Western Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand' and 'other countries'). Furthermore, we estimated the predicted likelihood of attendance with the aid of logistic regression, using attendance (yes/no) as the outcome variable. Independent variables in the model included place of residence (Oslo/other counties), country of birth and interaction between these variables. In addition, we adjusted for age at the time of the invitation, education and marital status. RESULTS: Among women residing in Oslo, attendance was 67 % among Norwegian-born women, 61 % among women born in Western Europe, Northern America, Australia and New Zealand, and 39 % among women born in 'other countries'. Among women residing outside Oslo, the corresponding attendance was 79 %, 71 % and 50 % respectively. INTERPRETATION: Oslo as place of residence was associated with lower attendance in BreastScreen Norway, especially among immigrant women from 'other countries', and independently of adjustment for possible confounding variables.

Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review.

OBJECTIVES: "True" breast cancers, defined as not being visible on prior screening mammograms, are expected to be more aggressive than "missed" cancers, which are visible in retrospect. However, the evidence to support this hypothesis is limited. We compared the risk of death from any cause for women with true, minimal signs, and missed invasive screen-detected (SDC) and interval breast cancers (IC). METHODS: This nation-wide study included 1022 SDC and 788 IC diagnosed through BreastScreen Norway during 2005-2016. Cancers were classified as true, minimal signs, or missed by five breast radiologists in a consensus-based informed review of prior screening and diagnostic images. We used multivariable Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of death from any cause associated with true, minimal signs, and missed breast cancers, adjusting for age at diagnosis, histopathologic tumour diameter and grade, and subtype. Separate models were created for SDC and IC. RESULTS: Among SDC, 463 (44%) were classified as true and 242 (23%) as missed; among IC, 325 (39%) were classified as true and 235 (32%) missed. Missed SDC were associated with a similar risk of death as true SDC (HR = 1.20, 95% CI (0.49, 2.46)). Similar results were observed for missed versus true IC (HR = 1.31, 95% CI (0.77, 2.23)). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death for women diagnosed with true or missed SDC or IC; however, the number of cases reviewed and follow-up time limited the precision of our estimates. KEY POINTS: • An informed radiological review classified screen-detected and interval cancers as true, minimal signs, or missed based on prior screening and diagnostic mammograms. • It has been hypothesised that true cancers, not visible on the prior screening examination, may be more aggressive than missed cancers. • We did not observe a statistical difference in the risk of death from any cause for women with missed versus true screen-detected or interval breast cancers.

Waiting times and treatment following cancer diagnosis: comparison between immigrants and the Norwegian host population.

Background: There are concerns about timely access to appropriate cancer treatment for the growing immigrant population in Norway. This study aims to compare waiting times between cancer diagnosis and start of cancer treatment, as well as treatment patterns between immigrants in Norway and the host population.Material and methods: We performed a nationwide, registry-based study with individual-level data, including 213,320 Norwegians and 8324 immigrants diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung or prostate cancer in 1990-2014. Differences in time from diagnosis to treatment and in treatment patterns were described for the selected cancer sites. The Cox and logistic regressions were used to adjust for patient and tumour characteristics.Results: After adjustment for covariates, hazard ratios for time from diagnosis to treatment for non-Western immigrants compared to Norwegians were 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.95) for breast cancer and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75-0.95) for lung cancer, indicating longer waiting times. Treatment patterns in the four major cancer sites were similar among immigrants and the Norwegian host population, except for breast cancer, where women from East and South Asia received less breast-conserving surgery than the Norwegian host population (adjusted odds ratios 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.93) for East Asians and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.50-1.13) for South Asians).Conclusions: The present study reports delayed treatment for lung and breast cancer among immigrants from non-Western countries in Norway. Systematic differences in cancer treatment were not detected. However, less breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer patients from Asia compared to Norwegians was observed.

Gender, letters, relatives, and God: mediating actors in mammographic screening among Pakistani women in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Pakistani immigrant women in Norway have lower attendance rates in the national breast cancer screening program (BreastScreen Norway) compared to non-immigrants and immigrants from most other countries. PURPOSE: To identify and explore human and non-human actors that play a role for Pakistani immigrant women's attendance in the program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Qualitative interviews with 16 Norwegian-Pakistani women in 2017 and 2018. Inspired by Latour, we explored how human and non-human actors act and interact when Pakistani immigrant women consider attendance in BreastScreen Norway. RESULTS: Among the actors found to play a significant role in the relationship between Pakistani immigrant women and the screening program were trust in the healthcare system and breast cancer screening, the gender of the screening radiographer, the written information received from the screening program, family life, daughters, general practitioners, non-governmental organizations, religious beliefs, private service providers, monetary expenses, accessibility, worries, and digital tools. CONCLUSION: Many human and non-human actors work to shape and influence Pakistani immigrant women's screening attendance, or lack thereof, for instance by creating thoughts, promoting opportunities, raising doubts and generating worries, thus variously encouraging, enabling, facilitating, discouraging or preventing attendance in organized breast cancer screening.

Pathway times in the mammography programme before and after introduction of the breast cancer care pathway. / Forløpstider i Mammografi-programmet før og etter innføring av pakkeforløp for brystkreft.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of introducing the 'cancer patient pathway for breast cancer' was to ensure a coherent treatment pathway without unnecessary delays. Radiologists and pathologists who work with breast diagnostics are involved in both cancer patient pathways and BreastScreen Norway. The extent to which this policy may have affected waiting times has not been analysed previously. This study presents waiting times in BreastScreen Norway before and after introduction of cancer patient pathway. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analysed waiting times associated with 1 485 240 screening examinations undertaken as part of BreastScreen Norway in the period 01.7.2011-30.6.2018, stratified by breast diagnostic centre. Waiting times were defined as the number of calendar days from the a) screening examination to the dispatch of the negative results letter (dispatch time), b) screening examination to the date on which the follow-up examination was performed (follow-up examination time) and c) follow-up examination to diagnosis (diagnosis time). Data were retrieved from the Cancer Registry of Norway's databases. Use of these is set out in the Cancer Registry Regulations. We calculated median waiting times in addition to 90th percentiles. RESULTS: The median dispatch time was 13 days before the cancer patient pathway was introduced, and 12 days after. The median follow-up examination time increased from 23 to 27 days, while the median diagnosis time was 3 days both before and after introduction of the cancer patient pathway. INTERPRETATION: Dispatch and diagnosis times were unchanged, or slightly changed after introduction of the cancer patient pathway, while follow-up examination time increased somewhat. Introduction of the cancer patient pathway may have led to differential adjustments in priorities, workflows and access to resources between the breast diagnostic centres.

Performance measures among non-immigrants and immigrants attending BreastScreen Norway: a population-based screening programme.

OBJECTIVES: To explore performance measures among non-immigrants and immigrants attending BreastScreen Norway. METHODS: We analysed data from 2,951,375 screening examinations among non-immigrants and 153,026 among immigrants from 1996 to 2015. Immigrants were categorised into high- and low-incidence countries according to the incidence of breast cancer in their birth country. Performance measures, including attendance and recall rates, rates of screen-detected cancer (SDC) and interval breast cancer (IBC), positive predictive value (PPV) and histopathological tumour characteristics, were analysed. We used Fisher's exact model and t tests for descriptive statistics, and Poisson regression, adjusting for age and screening history, comparing results for non-immigrants versus immigrants. RESULTS: Attendance rates were 78% for non-immigrants and 56% for immigrants (p < 0.001). Rates of prevalent screens were 24% for non-immigrants and 32% for immigrants (p < 0.001). Immigrants from low-incidence countries were younger at diagnosis than non-immigrants (57 years versus 60 years, p < 0.001). Recall rates were 3.1% for non-immigrants and 3.8% for immigrants (p < 0.001), while PPVs were 17% and 14% (p < 0.001), respectively. IBCs in immigrants from low-incidence countries were more often triple negative (RRadj 1.81, 95% CI 1.11-2.94) than those in non-immigrants. Both SDC and IBC in immigrants from low-incidence countries tended more often to be histological grade 3 than those in non-immigrants. CONCLUSION: Immigrants had lower attendance rates, higher recall rates and lower PPV than non-immigrants. The optimal age range and screening interval for immigrant women from low-incidence countries need to be further investigated. KEY POINTS: • Immigrants from countries with a low incidence of breast cancer had their breast cancer diagnosed at a younger age than non-immigrants. • Interval breast cancers detected in immigrants from countries with a low incidence of breast cancers were more often triple negative than those in non-immigrants. • The optimal age range and screening interval for immigrant women from low-incidence countries and non-immigrants might differ.

Mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background Groups of immigrant and minority women are more often diagnosed with advanced stage breast cancer than other women. Mammographic screening aims to reduce mortality from breast cancer through early detection in asymptomatic women. Purpose To compare mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and minority women to that of other women. Material and Methods A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane identified 1369 papers published between January 1995 and March 2016. In the review, we included 33 studies investigating mammographic screening attendance among immigrant and/or minority women. In a meta-analysis, we included 19 of the studies that compared attendance among immigrant and/or minority women with that among other women, using a random effects model. Results The review included studies from Europe, North America, and Oceania, with 42,666,093 observations of opportunities for mammographic screening. Attendance was generally lower among immigrant and minority women compared to other women (46.2% vs. 55.0%; odds ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval = 0.56-0.73; P < 0.05, I2 = 99.9%). Non-Western immigrants had lower attendance rates than other immigrants. Conclusion Immigrant and minority women had lower mammographic screening attendance than other women, which could potentially put them at increased risk for more advanced breast cancer. This review emphasizes the importance of continued efforts to engage with the preventative health needs of diverse populations in attempts to achieve equality in access to, and use of, care.

Lower attendance rates in immigrant versus non-immigrant women in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme.

OBJECTIVE: The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme invites women aged 50-69 to biennial mammographic screening. Although 84% of invited women have attended at least once, attendance rates vary across the country. We investigated attendance rates among various immigrant groups compared with non-immigrants in the programme. METHODS: There were 4,053,691 invitations sent to 885,979 women between 1996 and 2015. Using individual level population-based data from the Cancer Registry and Statistics Norway, we examined percent attendance and calculated incidence rate ratios, comparing immigrants with non-immigrants, using Poisson regression, following women's first invitation to the programme and for ever having attended. RESULTS: Immigrant women had lower attendance rates than the rest of the population, both following the first invitation (53.1% versus 76.1%) and for ever having attended (66.9% versus 86.4%). Differences in attendance rates between non-immigrant and immigrant women were less pronounced, but still present, when adjusted for sociodemographic factors. We also identified differences in attendance between immigrant groups. Attendance increased with duration of residency in Norway. A subgroup analysis of migrants' daughters showed that 70.0% attended following the first invitation, while 82.3% had ever attended. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant women had lower breast cancer screening attendance rates. The rationale for immigrant women's non-attendance needs to be explored through further studies targeting women from various birth countries and regions.

Monthly variation in mammographic screening attendance in Norway.

Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM) increases screening attendance in the USA. However, this effect has not been investigated in Europe, where organized screening is widespread. We examined monthly attendance within the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Programme, 2005-15. Relative to October, the odds of attending screening in January, February, March, August, September or December were slightly decreased (ORadj 0.93-0.98, P ≤ 0.003 for all). BCAM may marginally increase attendance in October but seasonal factors such as weather may also explain this observed variation. Furthermore, it is possible that organized screening with predetermined appointments evens out the effect BCAM has on screening attendance.