Impact of the New Heart Allocation System on the Medium-Term Outcomes in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The introduction of the new heart allocation system in the United States in 2018 resulted in an increase in the number of heart transplants (HT) performed among patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, whether that affected medium-term post-HT outcomes in this group of patients remains unknown. We conducted an analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Transplant Database, including adults with HCM who underwent heart transplantation between 2015 and 2021. Patients were divided into two equal-duration eras: Era 1 (October 17, 2015, to October 17, 2018) and Era 2 (October 18, 2018, to October 18, 2021). In the studied period, 444 patients with HCM underwent HT: 204 in Era 1 and 240 in Era 2. In Era 2, the waitlist time was shorter, transplant rates were higher, patients were less frequently supported with inotropes but more often with an IABP, ischemic time was longer, and donor-to-recipient distance larger. Pre- and post-transplant functional status was comparable across the two eras, while the pre-HT employment rate was higher in the new system. The 3 year survival was unchanged across eras. In the new allocation system, despite more frequent mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use and increased ischemic time, the medium-term outcomes of patients with HCM remained favorable.

Long-term post-transplantation outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Single-center 35-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) is the only option for most patients with end-stage heart failure and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who fail medical therapy. Data on the long-term outcomes post-transplant in HCM individuals remain scarce. METHODS: We analyzed data of 319 adult patients who underwent HT between 1984 and 2019. Patients were followed for cardiac allograft rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), death, or re-transplantation. RESULTS: Outcomes of 24 patients with HCM, 160 with ischemic, and 135 with dilated cardiomyopathy were compared. During a mean follow-up of 11.6 ± 7.2 (max 27.8), 16.7 ± 8.2 (max 32.7), and 16.1 ± 9.7 (max 34.6) years after HT in hypertrophic, ischemic, and dilated cardiomyopathy groups, respectively: 10-year survival rate was 67%, 62%, 69%, respectively (p = .04). Post-transplantation, HCM individuals more often than the other two studied groups required prolonged inotropic support (37%, 12%, 17%, respectively, p = .02), temporary mechanical circulatory support (45%, 13%, 14%, respectively, p < .01), and renal replacement therapy immediately post-HT (55%, 19%, 24%, respectively, p < .01). No significant inter-group differences were noted in the 10-year freedom from acute allograft rejection (38%, 46%, 43%, respectively, p = .38) or 10-year freedom from CAV (88%, 78%, 81%, respectively, p = .57). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term post-transplant prognosis of adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is favorable despite more challenging immediate post-HT course.

Olanzapine-Induced Diabetic Ketoacidosis: A Reversible Etiology Overlooked in Psychiatric Patients.

Background/Objective: Olanzapine is a second-generation antipsychotic medication with increased side effects of weight gain, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance. Here we describe a case of diabetic ketoacidosis in a patient who started taking olanzapine 12 weeks before she presented. Case Report: A 73-year-old African-American female presented with a 1-week history of confusion, polyuria, and polydipsia. Her past medical history included type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and severe depression with psychotic features. Her medications were olanzapine 5 mg, duloxetine 90 mg, and rosuvastatin 5 mg daily. Three weeks prior, she was diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated for a urinary tract infection. Her physical exam upon admission included severely dry mucous membranes and labored respirations. The circulating glucose was 748 mg/dL (70-110), anion gap 39 mmol/L (7-16), and hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) 11.8% (105 mmol/mol). Three months prior, her HgbA1c was 6.7% (50 mmol/mol). She was treated with intravenous fluids and continuous insulin infusion followed by subcutaneous basal-bolus glargine and lispro after an anion gap of 13 mmol/L (7-16) was obtained. Two weeks into her hospitalization, olanzapine was discontinued. She was discharged on 10 units of glargine and metformin 500 mg twice daily. Five months after discharge, she indicated not taking any of the prescribed insulin or metformin. At this follow-up, her HgbA1c was 6.7%. Discussion: Olanzapine may impair insulin secretion by causing pancreatic beta-cell apoptosis. Conclusion: Increased awareness of the generalized metabolic effects and risk of diabetic ketoacidosis associated with antipsychotic medications is needed to develop a safe treatment plan for patients.

Enhanced Left Ventricular Recovery in Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

A 73-year-old male patient presented with shortness of breath at rest resulting from new-onset severe primary mitral regurgitation with a flail posterior leaflet, left ventricular dysfunction, and cardiogenic shock. After initial stabilization in the intensive care unit, multiple treatment options were considered for this patient, all associated with significant mortality. Ultimately, operative mitral valve repair with Impella 5.5 placement was performed for postoperative hemodynamic support. Surgical repair provided elimination of mitral regurgitation. Impella support was maintained for 7 days to provide unloading of the left ventricle. After device removal, the patient had sustained left ventricular recovery with significantly improved ejection fraction. Full left ventricular support and unloading may decrease operative risk and promote left ventricular recovery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. This case emphasizes the value of ventricular unloading to facilitate the recovery of left ventricular function as a treatment option for patients with challenging cases of severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction.

Amiodarone Use and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Background Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are commonly encountered in patients with advanced heart failure, with amiodarone being the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drug in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of amiodarone use on long-term all-cause mortality in ptients with a CF-LVAD. Methods and Results A retrospective multicenter study of CF-LVAD was conducted at 5 centers including all CF-LVAD implants from 2007 to 2015. Patients were stratified based on pre-CF-LVAD implant amiodarone use. Additional use of amiodarone after CF-LVAD implantation was also evaluated. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality during long-term follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify predictors of outcomes. Propensity matching was done to address baseline differences. A total of 480 patients with a CF-LVAD (aged 58±13 years, 81% men) were included. Of these, 170 (35.4%) were on chronic amiodarone therapy at the time of CF-LVAD implant, and 310 (64.6%) were not on amiodarone. Rate of all-cause mortality over the follow-up period was 32.9% in the amiodarone group compared with 29.6% in those not on amiodarone (P=0.008). Similar results were noted in the propensity-matched group (log-rank, P=0.04). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, amiodarone use at baseline was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.1-2.5]; P=0.01). Conclusions Amiodarone use was associated with significantly increased rates of all-cause mortality in CF-LVAD recipients. Earlier interventions for arrhythmias to avoid long-term amiodarone exposure may improve long-term outcomes in CF-LVAD recipients and needs further study.

Heart Transplant Donor Selection Guidelines: Review and Recommendations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The rate of heart transplants, while steadily increasing, is insufficient to meet the growing list of transplant candidates. Marginal donors expand the donor pool. However, criteria used to identify donors greatly vary by institution. RECENT FINDINGS: The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) heart transplant report of 2020 reinforced the importance of donor selection criteria on heart transplant outcomes. Existing literature challenges and reinforces the report's findings. Newer methods, such as donation after circulatory death (DCD), also recontextualize existing donor selection criteria. Transplant prediction models from international databases are poor predictors of individual centers' outcome. Further study is needed to understand associations among donor risk factors, and update the methods used for donor heart selection. In this review, we examine the current literature on extended donor criteria and recommend a model for donor selection.

Immunomodulation of T- and NK-cell Responses by a Bispecific Antibody Targeting CD28 Homolog and PD-L1.

Checkpoint blockade therapies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are clinically successful but also evoke adverse events due to systemic T-cell activation. We engineered a bispecific, mAb targeting CD28 homolog (CD28H), a newly identified B7 family receptor that is constitutively expressed on T and natural killer (NK) cells, with a PD-L1 antibody to potentiate tumor-specific immune responses. The bispecific antibody led to T-cell costimulation, induced NK-cell cytotoxicity of PD-L1-expressing tumor cells, and activated tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells. Mechanistically, the CD28H agonistic arm of the bispecific antibody reduced PD-L1/PD-1-induced SHP2 phosphorylation while simultaneously augmenting T-cell receptor signaling by activating the MAPK and AKT pathways. This bispecific approach could be used to target multiple immune cells, including CD8+ T cells, tissue-resident memory T cells, and NK cells, in a tumor-specific manner that may lead to induction of durable, therapeutic antitumor responses.

Vasoplegia from Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The contribution of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (c-LVAD) to vasoplegic syndrome and postoperative outcomes after orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is contested in the literature. A standardized definition of vasoplegic syndrome (VS) is needed to better recognize and manage vasoplegic shock. RECENT FINDINGS: Vasoplegic syndrome occurs after orthotopic heart transplant more frequently than after other surgeries requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. c-LVADs lead to small vessel endothelial dysfunction and desensitized adrenal receptors; however, their contribution to the development of vasoplegia is debated in clinical studies. Pulsatility may mitigate vascular dysfunction resulting from long-term continuous flow, and should be further explored in the clinical setting when considering risk factors for vasoplegic syndrome. The incidence of vasoplegic syndrome after orthotopic heart transplant is rising with the increasing use of c-LVAD bridge to therapy. Robust clinical studies are needed to advance our understanding and approach to mitigating VS after OHT.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related procedures and associated complications in continuous flow left ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding complication rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-D) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). OBJECTIVE: We describe the incidence and characteristics of ICD- and CRT-D-related procedures and complications in a multicenter LVAD cohort. METHODS: A total of 537 LVAD patients with a pre-existing ICD or CRT-D from 5 centers were included. Details on device type, device therapies, procedural complications, and long-term survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 537 patients, 280 had a CRT-D and 257 had ICD only. During a median follow-up of 538 days, 126 patients underwent generator replacement with significantly higher rate in the CRT group (79 [28.2%] vs 47 [18.3%], P = .0006). Device-related complications occurred in 36 (13%) CRT-D and 20 (8%) ICD patients (P = .06). Incidence of pocket hematoma (3.2% vs 2.7%), infection (4.3% vs 1.6%), and lead malfunction (3.1% vs 2.8%) was similar in both groups, with no effect of device complication on long-term survival (log-rank P = .7). There was a higher incidence of post-LVAD antitachycardia pacing for ventricular arrhythmias in the CRT-D group compared to the ICD group (35% vs 26%, P = .03). CONCLUSION: Cardiac implantable electronic device-related procedures are common in LVAD patients. Compared to ICD only, continued CRT-D therapy post-LVAD results in a significantly higher number of generator changes and a trend towards higher device- or lead-related complications. Device-related complications were not associated with reduced survival.

Frailty in heart transplantation: Report from the heart workgroup of a consensus conference on frailty.

A consensus conference on frailty in solid organ transplantation took place on February 11, 2018, to discuss the latest developments in frailty, adopt a standardized approach to assessment, and generate ideas for future research. The findings and consensus of the Frailty Heart Workgroup (American Society of Transplantation's Thoracic and Critical Care Community of Practice) are presented here. Frailty is defined as a clinically recognizable state of increased vulnerability resulting from aging-associated decline in reserve and function across multiple physiologic systems such that the ability to cope with every day or acute stressors is compromised. Frailty is increasingly recognized as a distinct biologic entity that can adversely affect outcomes before and after heart transplantation. A greater proportion of patients referred for heart transplantation are older and have more complex comorbidities. However, outcomes data in the pretransplant setting, particularly for younger patients, are limited. Therefore, there is a need to develop objective frailty assessment tools for risk stratification in patients with advanced heart disease. These tools will help to determine appropriate recipient selection for advanced heart disease therapies including heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support, improve overall outcomes, and help distinguish frailty phenotypes amenable to intervention.

Continued versus Suspended Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in heart failure patients with wide QRS complex. However, CRT management following continuous flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implant vary: some centers continue CRT while others turn off the left ventricular (LV) lead at LVAD implant. We sought to study the effect of continued CRT versus turning off CRT pacing following continuous flow LVAD implantation. A comprehensive retrospective multicenter cohort of 295 patients with LVAD and pre-existing CRT was studied. CRT was programmed off after LVAD implant in 44 patients. We compared their outcomes to the rest of the cohort using univariate and multivariate models. Mean age was 60 ± 12 years, 83% were males, 52% had ischemic cardiomyopathy and 54% were destination therapy. Mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 2.0 years, and mean LVAD support time was 1.7 ± 1.4 years. Patients with CRT OFF had a higher Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) mean profile (3.9 vs 3.3, p = 0.01), more secondary prevention indication for a defibrillator (64.9% vs 44.5%, p = 0.023), and more pre-LVAD ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (77% vs 60%, p = 0.048). There were no differences between the CRT OFF and CRT ON groups in overall mortality (Log rank p = 0.32, adjusted HR = 1.14 [0.54-2.22], p = 0.71), heart transplantation, cardiac and noncardiac mortality, all cause hospitalizations, hospitalizations for ICD shocks, and number and frequency of ICD shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing therapy. There were no differences in post LVAD atrial arrhythmias (AA) (Adjusted OR = 0.45 [0.18-1.06], p = 0.31) and ventricular arrhythmias (OR = 0.65 [0.41-1.78], p = 0.41). There was no difference in change in LVEF, LV end diastolic and end systolic diameters between the 2 groups. Our study suggests that turning off CRT pacing after LVAD implantation in patients with previous CRT pacing did not affect mortality, heart transplantation, device therapies or arrhythmia burden. A prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.

Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007-2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival.

Impact of QRS Duration and Ventricular Pacing on Clinical and Arrhythmic Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: Wide QRS duration and ventricular pacing are common in recipients of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) but their impact on outcomes remains unclear. We assessed the clinical and arrhythmic outcomes of CF-LVAD patients with wide QRS or right ventricular (RV) pacing at baseline, compared with those with narrow QRS and those with continued cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 520 patients (57 ± 13 years) with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (n = 240) or CRT-defibrillator (n = 280) who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at 5 centers in 2007-2015 were studied. Patients were divided into 3 groups: ICD-N (QRS ≤120 ms; n = 134), ICD-W (QRS >120 ms; n = 106), and CRT (n = 280). Mortality, hospitalization, and ventricular arrhythmia (VA) incidence were compared among the groups. Baseline QRS duration was different among the groups (100 ± 13 [ICD-N] vs 155 ± 26 [ICD-W] vs 159 ± 29 ms [CRT]; P < .0001). In the ICD-W group, 37 (35%) had >80% RV pacing at baseline. Median biventricular pacing in the CRT group was 96%. Over 523 days of CF-LVAD support, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in survival among groups (log rank P = .9). According to multivariate Cox regression, wide QRS duration and RV pacing were not associated with survival. QRS narrowed during CF-LVAD support in the ICD-W and CRT groups but was not associated with improved survival (P = .9). No differences were noted among the groups in hospitalizations (P = .9), VA (P = .2), or ICD shocks (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: In this large CF-LVAD cohort, a wide QRS duration, high percentage of RV pacing at baseline, and changes in QRS duration after LVAD implantation were not associated with survival. Continued CRT after CF-LVAD implantation also was not associated with improved survival or HF hospitalizations.

Improved Nutrition Status in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Implanted With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for advanced heart failure is known to improve survival, functional capacity, and quality of life. Most patients implanted with LVADs suffer from moderate to severe malnutrition and deconditioning due to their advanced disease. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and the short form of the survey (MNA-SF) are 2 well-validated clinical tools, previously used to assess patient nutrition status in numerous conditions. Earlier work has demonstrated that low nutrition scores can independently predict mortality in the LVAD population. This study explored changes in MNA scores and other clinical markers following LVAD. METHODS: This retrospective study included 74 patients implanted with LVADs between 2012 and 2017. MNA or MNA-SF along with other clinical data and nutrition indices were assessed during the preoperative workup and reassessed on average 423.9 days post LVAD. Paired-samples t-tests were used to evaluate any changes. RESULTS: Despite an average body mass index of 30.8, 28.3% of patients were classified by MNA as malnourished, and 58.5% were considered at risk prior to LVAD implantation. Post LVAD implantation, MNA scores improved from an average of 19.2-23.0 (P < 0.001), with now only 3.8% classified as malnourished and 45.3% classified as at risk. MNA-SF and prognostic nutritional index also improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that LVAD implantation is associated with a long-term improvement in nutrition status when compared with the preoperative heart failure state.

Postoperative B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as Predictor for Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Implanted With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a cardiac neurohormone known to correlate with left ventricular (LV) dilation, decreased contractility, and increased stiffness. Consequently, BNP has been used as a prognostic tool to assess the degree of LV unloading for patients supported by continuous-flow LV assist devices (LVADs). We assessed the prognostic value of changes in BNP in the 2 weeks after LVAD implantation. This retrospective study analyzed laboratory findings and outcomes of 189 LVAD patients. Patients were separated into two groups based on whether serum BNP levels had improved from preoperative levels by postoperative day 14. Group 1 had improvement in BNP levels, whereas group 2 had no improvement or worsening in BNP. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender, race, body mass index, or comorbidities. Group 1 had preoperative BNP 1,125 ± 1,078.3 pg/dl and postoperative BNP 440.2 ± 267.7 pg/dl (preoperative minus postoperative [ΔBNP] = -693.09 ± 942.4 pg/dl), whereas group 2 had preoperative BNP 346.0 ± 309.1 pg/dl and postoperative BNP 631.57 ± 483.4 pg/dl (ΔBNP = 289.32 ± 329.7 pg/dl). Postoperative survival in group 2 was significantly worse than in group 1. Rates of right ventricular failure (RVF) were significantly higher in group 2 (group 1: 39%, group 2: 52.7%; p = 0.01). In most patients implanted with a LVAD, BNP improves significantly in the postoperative period as the LV is unloaded. Our results indicate that lack of improvement in postoperative BNP is associated with longer length of stay, increased rates of RVF, and is an independent risk factor for reduced postoperative survival.

Report from the American Society of Transplantation on frailty in solid organ transplantation.

A consensus conference on frailty in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation sponsored by the American Society of Transplantation (AST) and endorsed by the American Society of Nephrology (ASN), the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS), and the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) took place on February 11, 2018 in Phoenix, Arizona. Input from the transplant community through scheduled conference calls enabled wide discussion of current concepts in frailty, exploration of best practices for frailty risk assessment of transplant candidates and for management after transplant, and development of ideas for future research. A current understanding of frailty was compiled by each of the solid organ groups and is presented in this paper. Frailty is a common entity in patients with end-stage organ disease who are awaiting organ transplantation, and affects mortality on the waitlist and in the posttransplant period. The optimal methods by which frailty should be measured in each organ group are yet to be determined, but studies are underway. Interventions to reverse frailty vary among organ groups and appear promising. This conference achieved its intent to highlight the importance of frailty in organ transplantation and to plant the seeds for further discussion and research in this field.

HVAD: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of blood pressure management on stroke rates in patients receiving the HeartWare HVAD System. BACKGROUND: The ENDURANCE trial demonstrated noninferiority of the HeartWare HVAD System versus control (HeartMate II) in patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for heart transplantation. However, stroke was more common in HVAD subjects. Post hoc analyses demonstrated increased mean arterial blood pressure as a significant independent risk factor for stroke. METHODS: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial was a prospective, multicenter evaluation of 465 patients with advanced heart failure ineligible for transplantation, randomized 2:1 to HVAD (n = 308) or control (n = 157). The primary endpoint was the 12-month incidence of transient ischemic attack or stroke with residual deficit 24 weeks post-event. Secondary endpoints included the composite of freedom from death, disabling stroke, and need for device replacement or urgent transplantation, as well as comparisons of stroke or transient ischemic attack rates in HVAD cohorts in ENDURANCE Supplemental and ENDURANCE. RESULTS: The enhanced blood pressure protocol significantly reduced mean arterial blood pressure. The primary endpoint was not achieved (14.7% with HVAD vs. 12.1% with control, noninferiority [margin 6%] p = 0.14). However, the secondary composite endpoint demonstrated superiority of HVAD (76.1%) versus control (66.9%) (p = 0.04). The incidence of stroke in HVAD subjects was reduced 24.2% in ENDURANCE Supplemental compared with ENDURANCE (p = 0.10), and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident was reduced by 50.5% (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial failed to demonstrate noninferiority of HVAD versus control regarding the pre-specified primary endpoint. However, the trial confirmed that BP management is associated with reduced stroke rates in HVAD subjects. HVAD subjects, relative to control subjects, more commonly achieved the composite endpoint (freedom from death, disabling stroke, and device replacement or urgent transplantation). (A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the HeartWare™ Ventricular Assist System [ENDURANCE SUPPLEMENTAL TRIAL] [DT2]; NCT01966458).

Risk stratification with longitudinal neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio assessment after left ventricular assist device implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory processes are well-characterized risk factors in cardiovascular disease including advanced heart failure. Previous studies have utilized individual white cell subtypes in risk analysis, and a recent study has focused on the efficacy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in evaluating negative outcomes following left ventricular assist device implantation. To investigate the interaction between the left ventricular assist device and white cell counts, we assessed longitudinal changes in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio following left ventricular assist device implantation. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation between 2012 and 2013. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was calculated prior to left ventricular assist device implantation, daily for the first 30 postoperative days, and at the first two postoperative outpatient visits. Preoperative demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. RESULTS: The mean neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio immediately before left ventricular assist device implantation was 5.2 ± 4.9. After surgery, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decreased asymptotically, from a peak of 29.2 on postoperative day 1 to 4.1 at the second outpatient visit ( p < 0.001). Lack of improvement in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at postoperative day 10 was associated with increased length of stay, right heart failure, and a trend toward worsened survival. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a significant inflammatory response to implantation of the left ventricular assist device, a known effect. The magnitude of this response may be effectively and easily monitored over time using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. In general, approximately 30 days is required for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to return to preoperative levels. After several months, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio improves to below preoperative levels. It is possible that this reduction reflects the reversal of various heart failure-mediated inflammatory processes following left ventricular assist device implantation.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with heart failure continue cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implant. We report the first multicenter study to assess the impact of CRT on clinical outcomes in CF-LVAD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analysis was performed on 488 patients (58±13 years, 81% male) with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (n=223) or CRT-D (n=265) who underwent CF-LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007 to 2015. Effects of CRT on mortality, hospitalizations, and ventricular arrhythmia incidence were compared against CF-LVAD patients with an ICD alone. Baseline differences were noted between the 2 groups in age (60±12 versus 55±14, P<0.001) and QRS duration (159±29 versus 126±34, P=0.001). Median biventricular pacing in the CRT group was 96%. During a median follow-up of 478 days, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in survival between groups (log rank P=0.28). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated no survival benefit with type of device (ICD versus CRT-D; P=0.16), whereas use of amiodarone was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8, P=0.01). No differences were noted between CRT and ICD groups in all-cause (P=0.06) and heart failure (P=0.9) hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmia incidence (43% versus 39%, P=0.3), or ICD shocks (35% versus 29%, P=0.2). During follow-up, 69 (26%) patients underwent pulse generator replacement in the CRT-D group compared with 36 (15.5%) in the ICD group (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multicenter CF-LVAD cohort, continued CRT was not associated with improved survival, hospitalizations, incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and ICD therapies, and was related to a significantly higher number of pulse generator changes.

Effect of Vitamin D Level on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D is an important hormone that regulates cardiac myocyte function. Low levels contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease and have been implicated in immune function and the inflammatory cascade. Patients who undergo left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are at risk for driveline infection, stroke, and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. We investigated whether serum 25-hydroxy (25-OH) vitamin D levels affect clinical outcomes after LVAD. METHODS: 212 patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2015 were included. We measured preoperative 25-OH vitamin D level and postoperative adverse events during the first year. Vitamin D level was classified into 3 categories: normal (>30 ng/mL), insufficient (20-30 ng/mL), and deficient (<20 ng/mL). Clinical outcomes in both insufficient and deficient categories were compared with the normal category. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) of being admitted ≥2 times was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.067-5.769) for deficiency and 2.5 (95% CI: 0.970-6.443) for insufficiency. The OR of driveline infection was 6.185 (95% CI: 0.80-49.2; P = .07) for insufficiency and 11.467 (95% CI: 1.204-109.26; P = .03) for deficiency. Vitamin D levels were not associated with GI bleeding, length of stay, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LVAD, both deficiency and insufficiency of 25-OH vitamin D levels are independently associated with increased postoperative driveline infection risk and higher rate of readmission. Further trials are needed to confirm whether a repletion regimen could be a promising means of decreasing the risk for these postoperative adverse events.