RESUMO
PURPOSE: The hypothesis is that 2-dimensional kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers (kV-FM) and soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) are equally reproducible for daily positional alignments for image guided (IG) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer with IG-IMRT were imaged daily with kV-FM and ST-CBCT. For each acquired kV and CBCT image, offline alignments to the digitally reconstructed radiograph or planning CT, respectively, were made twice by the same physician to assess intraobserver test-retest reproducibility. The 256 kV and 142 CBCT images were analyzed, and the test-retest analysis was performed again on a subset of images by another physician to verify the results. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that kV-FM had better intraobserver test-retest reproducibility in the anterior-posterior (AP; 95% confidence interval [CI] Pearson correlation coefficient [r], 0.987-0.991), left-right (LR; 95% CI r, 0.955-0.969), and superior-inferior (SI; 95% CI r, 0.971-0.980) directions for daily IG alignments compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 95% CI r, 0.804-0.877; LR: 95% CI r, 0.877-0.924; SI: 95% CI r, 0.791-0.869). Errors associated with intraobserver test-retest reproducibility were submillimeter with kV-FM (AP: 0.4 ± 0.7 mm; RL: 0.4 ± 1.0 mm; SI: 0.5 ± 0.7 mm) compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 2.1 ± 2.2 mm; LR: 1.3 ± 1.4 mm; SI: 1.2 ± 1.8 mm). The mean shift differences between kV-FM and ST-CBCT were 0.3 ± 3.8 mm for AP, -1.1 ± 8.5 mm for LR, and -2.0 ± 3.7 mm for SI. Dose-volume histograms were generated and showed that test-retest variability associated with ST-CBCT IG-alignments resulted in significantly increased dose to normal structures and a reduced planning target volume dose in many patients. CONCLUSIONS: The kV-FM-based daily IG alignment for IMRT of prostate cancer is more precise than ST-CBCT, as assessed by a physician's ability to reproducibly align images. Given the magnitude of the error introduced by inconsistency in making ST-CBCT alignments, these data support a role for daily kV imaging of FM to enhance the precision of external beam dose delivery to the prostate.
RESUMO
PURPOSES: 1. To determine the optimal pelvic nodal clinical target volume for post-operative treatment of endometrial cancer. 2. To compare the DVH of different treatment planning techniques applied to this new CTV and the surrounding tissues. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Based on the literature, we selected a methodology to delineate nodal target volume to define a NEW-CTV and NEW-PTV. Conventional 2D fields, 3D fields based on anatomic guidelines per RTOG 0418, 3D fields based on our guidelines, and IMRT based on our guidelines were assessed for coverage of NEW-CTV, NEW-PTV, and surrounding structures. CT scans of 10 patients with gynecologic malignancies after TAH/BSO were used. DVHs were compared. RESULTS: For NEW-PTV, mean V45Gy were 50% and 69% for 2D and RTOG 0418-3DCRT vs. 98% and 97% for NEW-3DCRT and NEW-IMRT (p < 0.0009). Mean V45Gy small bowel were 24% and 20% for 2D and RTOG 0418-3DCRT, increased to 32% with NEW-3DCRT, and decreased to 14% with IMRT (p = 0.005, 0.138, 0.002). Mean V45Gy rectum were 26%, 35%, and 52% for 2D, RTOG 0418-3DCRT, and NEW-3DCRT, and decreased to 26% with NEW-IMRT (p < 0.05). Mean V45Gy bladder were 83%, 51%, and 73% for 2D, RTOG 0418-3DCRT, and NEW-3DCRT, and decreased to 30% with NEW-IMRT (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional 2D and RTOG 0418-based 3DCRT plans cover only a fraction of our comprehensive PTV. A 3DCRT plan covers this PTV with high doses to normal tissues, whereas IMRT covers the PTV while delivering lower normal tissue doses. Re-consideration of what specifically the pelvic target encompasses is warranted.