RESUMO
To study the incidence of the smell and taste disturbance in the COVID-19 patients and a follow up at 4 months to observe for the duration of resolution of these symptoms. This is a multicentric prospective study carried out in 3 different countries, from April, 2020 to January, 2021. The COVID-19 positive patients, aged between 15 and 60 years, were inquired about the presence of any smell or taste related symptoms. The same patients were followed up with the telephonic interview after 2 months and then after 4 months, respectively. The duration of resolution of the smell and taste disturbance symptoms was noted. Total of 188 COVID-19 positive patients, average age 33.1 ± 1.7 years, 54.2% males and 45.8% female were included in the study. The smell disturbance was present in 60.6% (hyposmia 36.1%, anosmia 20.2%, and parosmia 4.2%) and taste disturbance in 28.7% of patients (hypogeusia 20.2%, ageusia 6.9%, and parageusia 1.6%). There was improvement of anosmia by 97.4, hyposmia by 95.6%, parosmia by 100%, ageusia by 100%, hypogeusia 94.8%, and parageusia by 66.7%, at 4 months follow up. The present study concludes that the smell and taste disturbances are one of the main early presenting features of the COVID-19 infection. The temporary effect of the COVID-19 infection on the olfactory and gustatory pathway was also highlighted with more than 95% patients improving at 4 months of follow up.
RESUMO
To evaluate the hearing status of COVID-19 patients and compare with control group. Prospective study carried out in 9 institutes. The pure tone audiogram and impedance audiometry of COVID-19 patients performed initially and at 3 months follow up. The control group consisted COVID-19 negative individuals with no history of ear related diseases. The average of air and bone conduction threshold (AC and BC) were compared between the COVID-19 patients and control group using independent t-test with a p value of less than 0.05 considered significant. Total of 331 patients, age 32 ± 4.3 years, 66.7% males and 33.3% females were included in the study. There were 80 individuals in the control group. Aural symptoms were, tinnitus in 1.8%, aural fullness in 1.4%, hearing loss in 3. 9%, and ear ache in 1.8% were present initially, resolved at 3 months follow up. The impedance audiometry demonstrated type B and type C curve in 5.1% and 1.15% ears, and out of these 64.7% and 40% improved at 3 months follow up respectively. No significant difference observed between the average AC and BC of the COVID-19 patients and control group. The COVID-19 infection may present with aural symptoms; however, it was concluded that there was no significant difference in the hearing status of the COVID-19 positive patients in comparison to the control group. The presence of some changes in the normal functioning of the eustachian tube and middle ear in the COVID-19 infection was also highlighted.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a common ailment with rising trend and worldwide prevalence of some 400 million. METHODS: This prospective randomized crosssectional study was done at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tribhuvan University, Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal from June 2016 to August 2017. They were randomly assigned to two groups by lottery method. Group A received mometasone furoate intranasal spray and Group B received oral montelukast for a total duration of one month. Prior to starting medication and one month after medications, total nasal symptom score was documented. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 18. RESULTS: Total of 126 patients between 16 to 52 years were enrolled in the study. The mean duration of symptoms was 3.93 years. The mean value of serum total IgE was 833.49 IU/ml. The mean pre and post medication score for mometasone furoate intranasal spray group was 16.32 and 5.44 respectively, which was significant. Similarly, the mean pre and post medication score for oral montelukast group was 15.24 and 7.87 respectively which was also found to be significant. Comparing the means of scores for both the groups, mometasone furoate was found to be more effective than oral montelukast. CONCLUSIONS: Both mometasone furoate intranasal spray and oral montelukast were effective in the treatment of patient with allergic rhinitis. Oral montelukast can therefore be used as a first line treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis.
