Alleviating Morbidity From Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Using a Practical and Short Radiation Therapy Regimen: Results of the HYPORT Palliative Studies.

PURPOSE: Locally advanced breast cancers lead to debilitating local symptoms. Treatment of these women encountered commonly in less resourced countries is not backed by strong evidence. We formulated the  HYPORT and HYPORT B phase 1/2 studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated palliative breast radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two studies (35 Gy/10 fractions; HYPORT ) and (26 Gy to breast/32 Gy tumor boost in 5 fractions; HYPORT B) were designed with increasing hypofractionation to save overall treatment time from 10 to 5 days. We report the acute toxicity, symptomatic, metabolic response, and quality of life (QOL) changes after radiation therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients, the majority of whom were pretreated with systemic therapy, completed the treatment. No grade 3 toxicity was reported. Response assessment at 3 months showed improvement in ulceration (58% vs 22%, P = .013) and bleeding (22% vs 0%, P = .074) within the HYPORT study. Similarly, in the HYPORT B study, ulceration (64% and 39%, P = .2), fungating (26% and 0%, P = .041), bleeding (26% and 4.3%, P = .074), and discharge (57% and 8.7%, P = .003) was reduced. Metabolic response was noted in 90% and 83% of patients, respectively, in the 2 studies. Improvement in the QOL scores were evident in both studies. Only 10% of the patients relapsed locally within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy to the breast is well tolerated, is effective, and results in a durable response with improved QOL. This could be considered a standard for locoregional symptom control.

Xerostomia quality of life and resource requirements following parotid sparing adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancers: Results of a prospective cohort study (Study ID CTRI/2017/11/010683).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Parotid sparing adaptive radiotherapy (PSART) is resource intensive to implement. Selection criteria for using ART and its impact on quality of life (QoL) is poorly reported. This has been addressed in our study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients planned for curative radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancers were recruited following informed consent in a prospective cohort study. PSART was planned if the mean dose to index parotid(s) increased by 2% from the baseline approved plan. To assess the resource requirements of PSART manpower and time required for treatment planning both for initial as well as PSART was documented. Patient reported QoL using QualiXeQLS and EORTC QLQ C30 and HN35 were obtained pre radiotherapy, and at 3 and 9 months post radiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the ninety patients accrued, 87 were evaluable. 45 (51%) received PSART based on the prespecified criteria. The average time spent in contouring (276 min versus 133 min) and treatment planning (293 min versus 108 min) were almost doubled when PSART was implemented. XeQoL scores at 3 months were significantly worse in those receiving PSART (mean 2.3 vs 1.2, p 0.002). Despite this, xerostomia related QoL recovered to near baseline scores by 9 months after receiving PSART. CONCLUSION: Implementation of PSART is resource intensive. The proposed cutoff for implementing PSART identifies a higher risk population that have worse xerostomia related quality of life. This study lays the foundation for a randomized trial to determine the efficacy of PSART on xerostomia related QoL.

Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes in Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Carcinoma Nasopharynx: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcome of carcinoma nasopharynx patients treated with the IMRT technique. METHODS: Eighty-one nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who were treated with IMRT with or without chemotherapy between the period January 2011 and December 2014 at a comprehensive tertiary cancer center, Kerala, India, were included in the study. The mean age was 43 years (range 13-77 years), and majority of the patients were males (67.9%). The stagewise distribution of disease at presentation was 2 (2.5%) in stage I, 19 in stage II (23.5%), 31 (38.3%) in stage III, and 29 (35.8%) in stage IV. All patients were treated using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) schedule using IMRT with 6 MV photon to a dose of 66 Gy in 30 fractions, 2.2 Gy per fraction prescribed to high-risk PTV; 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction to intermediate risk PTV; and 54 Gy in 30 fractions, 1.8 Gy per fraction to low-risk PTV. Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin was offered to patients with stage II and above disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5FU was given to patients with initially advanced disease (T3, T4, N2, and N3). Survival estimates were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The univariate analysis was performed using log-rank tests. RESULTS: The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5%, 87%, 61.6%, and 62.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 100% for stage I (n = 2), 67% for stage II (n = 19), 70.4% for stage III (n = 31), and 68.1% for stage IV (n = 29). The DFS at 5 years was 100% for stage I, 61.1% for stage II, 56.2% for stage III, and 84.8% for stage IV disease. The univariate analysis showed that age, nodal stage, and use of induction chemotherapy showed an improved trend towards OS, though the results were not statistically significant. The predominant pattern of failure in the present study was distant metastasis. Most patients who developed distant metastasis in our study had either an advanced T stage or N3 disease at presentation. CONCLUSION: The present study shows our initial experience with IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The compliance to RT was good in this study. The 5-year LRC and OS rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with IMRT were 87.5% and 62.5%. Distant metastasis was the main pattern of failure.

Toxicity and clinical outcomes with definitive three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE(S): This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients of locally advanced cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and ten newly diagnosed patients of locally advanced cervical cancer of FIGO 2009 Stage II-III treated with 3DCRT (46 Gy/23 fractions/4½ weeks) and weekly concurrent Cisplatin (40 mg/m2), from January 2013 to 2015 were analyzed. A planning computed tomography was performed and contouring was done according to published guidelines. External radiotherapy was followed by Intracavitary brachytherapy delivered to a dose of 9 Gy HDR in 2-fractions, given one week apart. The endpoints were treatment related toxicities and clinical outcomes. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated and toxicities were documented using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (v3.0) (CTCAE). RESULTS: The median follow up time was 37 (range, 19-54) months. The 3 year OS, DFS and LC were 84.2%, 80.6% and 81% respectively. Grade ≥3 acute skin, upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was observed in 3 (1.4%), 11 (5.2%), 12 (5.7%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. Grade ≤2 hematological toxicity was observed in 154 (73.3%) patients. Grade ≥3 late GI and GU toxicity was seen in 9 (4.2%) patients and 2 (0.9%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: 3DCRT with concurrent chemotherapy results in good loco-regional control with acceptable normal tissue toxicity. In the background of indeterminate evidence regarding routine practice of intensity modulated radiotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix, 3DCRT may be considered as the treatment of choice.

Setup uncertainties and PTV margins at different anatomical levels in intensity modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer.

AIM: To determine the systematic error (∑), random error (σ) and derive PTV margin at different levels of the target volumes in Nasopharyngeal Cancer (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective offline review was done for patients who underwent IMRT for NPC from June 2015 to May 2016 at our institution. Alternate day kV images were matched with digitally reconstructed radiographs to know the setup errors. All radiographs were matched at three levels - the clivus, third cervical (C3) and sixth cervical (C6) vertebra. The shifts in positions along the vertical, longitudinal and lateral axes were noted and the ∑ and σ at three levels were calculated. PTV margins were derived using van Herk's formula. RESULTS: Twenty patients and 300 pairs of orthogonal portal films were reviewed. The ∑ for the clivus, C3 and C6 along vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were 1.6 vs. 1.8 vs. 2 mm; 1.2 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.4 mm and 0.9 vs. 1.6 and 2.3 mm, respectively. Similarly, the random errors were 1.1 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.8 mm; 1.1 vs. 1.2 vs. 1.2 mm and 1.2 vs. 1.3 vs. 1.6 mm. The PTV margin at the clivus was 4.4 mm along the vertical, 4 mm along the longitudinal direction and 3.2 m in the lateral direction. At the C3 level, it was 5.5 mm in the vertical, 5 mm in the lateral direction and 4.4 mm in the longitudinal direction. At the C6 level, it was 6.4 mm in the vertical, 6.9 mm in the lateral direction and 4.4 mm in the longitudinal direction. CONCLUSION: A differential margin along different levels of target may be necessary to adequately cover the target.

Is neurocysticercosis a risk factor for glioblastoma multiforme or a mere coincidence: A case report with review of literature.

Simultaneous occurrence of Neurocysticercosis (NC) along with Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is a very rare presentation. We herein describe a case report of treated case of NC 2 years back who presented with secondary GBM. The brief report highlights that there may be some associated factors which may lead to development of secondary GBM in preexisting helminthic infection.

Locally ablative non-surgical management of colo-rectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Liver is one of the commonest sites of metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Solitary liver metastasis or oligometastasis are traditionally treated by surgical resection or chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: There may be a subgroup of these patients who are not suitable for surgery or chemotherapy due to various co-morbid factors. These patients can be treated by novel minimally invasive or noninvasive ablative techniques like interstitial brachytherapy, extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation.